Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000400209 |
Resumo: | Abstract Core sampling for testing is considered a reliable method to provide information on structural materials and is one of the most implemented techniques in the evaluation of concrete elements. However, core drilling results in a decrease in cross section that can compromise structural mechanical strength even if the extracted section is repaired. Norm NBR 7680-1 recommends dry pack as a repair method but also allows the use of other techniques as long as its effectiveness is proven. This work evaluated the resistance of repaired structural prototypes after core drilling sampling. Concrete blocks with 20 MPa resistance were produced from which cores of 100 mm, 75 mm and 50 mm in diameter were extracted. The blocks were repaired with 20 MPa concrete, grout and dry pack techniques. The reconstitution with concrete showed poorest performance, while dry pack led to strengths even higher when compared to reference values. |
id |
IBRACON-1_b5d8ef00e2d4aa9e6a2dc8fd0a68b8e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1983-41952020000400209 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRACON-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extractioncore samplingdry packgroutcompression strengthAbstract Core sampling for testing is considered a reliable method to provide information on structural materials and is one of the most implemented techniques in the evaluation of concrete elements. However, core drilling results in a decrease in cross section that can compromise structural mechanical strength even if the extracted section is repaired. Norm NBR 7680-1 recommends dry pack as a repair method but also allows the use of other techniques as long as its effectiveness is proven. This work evaluated the resistance of repaired structural prototypes after core drilling sampling. Concrete blocks with 20 MPa resistance were produced from which cores of 100 mm, 75 mm and 50 mm in diameter were extracted. The blocks were repaired with 20 MPa concrete, grout and dry pack techniques. The reconstitution with concrete showed poorest performance, while dry pack led to strengths even higher when compared to reference values.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000400209Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.13 n.4 2020reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952020000400013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBartikoski,TauanaKautzmann,Vanessa OerleOrtolan,Vinicius de KayserTutikian,Bernardo FonsecaModolo,Reginaeng2020-08-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952020000400209Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2020-08-21T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
title |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
spellingShingle |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction Bartikoski,Tauana core sampling dry pack grout compression strength |
title_short |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
title_full |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
title_fullStr |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
title_sort |
Compression resistance of repaired structural concrete elements after core extraction |
author |
Bartikoski,Tauana |
author_facet |
Bartikoski,Tauana Kautzmann,Vanessa Oerle Ortolan,Vinicius de Kayser Tutikian,Bernardo Fonseca Modolo,Regina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kautzmann,Vanessa Oerle Ortolan,Vinicius de Kayser Tutikian,Bernardo Fonseca Modolo,Regina |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bartikoski,Tauana Kautzmann,Vanessa Oerle Ortolan,Vinicius de Kayser Tutikian,Bernardo Fonseca Modolo,Regina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
core sampling dry pack grout compression strength |
topic |
core sampling dry pack grout compression strength |
description |
Abstract Core sampling for testing is considered a reliable method to provide information on structural materials and is one of the most implemented techniques in the evaluation of concrete elements. However, core drilling results in a decrease in cross section that can compromise structural mechanical strength even if the extracted section is repaired. Norm NBR 7680-1 recommends dry pack as a repair method but also allows the use of other techniques as long as its effectiveness is proven. This work evaluated the resistance of repaired structural prototypes after core drilling sampling. Concrete blocks with 20 MPa resistance were produced from which cores of 100 mm, 75 mm and 50 mm in diameter were extracted. The blocks were repaired with 20 MPa concrete, grout and dry pack techniques. The reconstitution with concrete showed poorest performance, while dry pack led to strengths even higher when compared to reference values. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000400209 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000400209 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1983-41952020000400013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.13 n.4 2020 reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) instacron:IBRACON |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) |
instacron_str |
IBRACON |
institution |
IBRACON |
reponame_str |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
collection |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br |
_version_ |
1754193606111920128 |