Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paixão,Rafael Christian Fonseca da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Penido,Rúben El-Katib, Cury,Alexandre Abrahão, Mendes,Júlia Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952022000500200
Resumo: Abstract The compressive strength of concrete is an essential property to ensure the safety of a concrete structure. However, estimating this value is usually a laborious and uncertain process since the mix design is based on empirical methods and its confirmation in the laboratory demands time and resources. In this context, this work aims to evaluate Machine Learning (ML) models to predict the compressive strength of concrete from its constituents. For this purpose, a dataset from the literature was used as input to four ML models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). The accuracy of the models was evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation, and quantified by R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) metrics. Subsequently, a new dataset was put together with mixtures from the literature and used to validate the previous models. In the model creation step, all algorithms obtained similar and positive results, with MAE between 1.96-2.26 MPa and R2 varying from 0.79 to 0.83. However, in the validation step, the accuracy of the models dropped sharply, with MAE growing to 3.04-4.04 MPa and R2 decreasing to 0.37-0.59. ANN and GPR showed the best results, while SVR had the worst predictions. This work showed that ML tools are promising techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete. However, care must be taken with the input data to guarantee that models are not overfitted to a given region, set of materials, or type of concrete.
id IBRACON-1_b7b7b452b311d93f0c8c962cab7f6959
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-41952022000500200
network_acronym_str IBRACON-1
network_name_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalizationmachine learningconcrete mix designgeneralization abilitycompressive strengthconcrete database Abstract The compressive strength of concrete is an essential property to ensure the safety of a concrete structure. However, estimating this value is usually a laborious and uncertain process since the mix design is based on empirical methods and its confirmation in the laboratory demands time and resources. In this context, this work aims to evaluate Machine Learning (ML) models to predict the compressive strength of concrete from its constituents. For this purpose, a dataset from the literature was used as input to four ML models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). The accuracy of the models was evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation, and quantified by R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) metrics. Subsequently, a new dataset was put together with mixtures from the literature and used to validate the previous models. In the model creation step, all algorithms obtained similar and positive results, with MAE between 1.96-2.26 MPa and R2 varying from 0.79 to 0.83. However, in the validation step, the accuracy of the models dropped sharply, with MAE growing to 3.04-4.04 MPa and R2 decreasing to 0.37-0.59. ANN and GPR showed the best results, while SVR had the worst predictions. This work showed that ML tools are promising techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete. However, care must be taken with the input data to guarantee that models are not overfitted to a given region, set of materials, or type of concrete.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952022000500200Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.15 n.5 2022reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952022000500003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaixão,Rafael Christian Fonseca daPenido,Rúben El-KatibCury,Alexandre AbrahãoMendes,Júlia Castroeng2022-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952022000500200Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2022-03-07T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
title Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
spellingShingle Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
Paixão,Rafael Christian Fonseca da
machine learning
concrete mix design
generalization ability
compressive strength
concrete database
title_short Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
title_full Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
title_fullStr Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
title_sort Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete and considerations on model generalization
author Paixão,Rafael Christian Fonseca da
author_facet Paixão,Rafael Christian Fonseca da
Penido,Rúben El-Katib
Cury,Alexandre Abrahão
Mendes,Júlia Castro
author_role author
author2 Penido,Rúben El-Katib
Cury,Alexandre Abrahão
Mendes,Júlia Castro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paixão,Rafael Christian Fonseca da
Penido,Rúben El-Katib
Cury,Alexandre Abrahão
Mendes,Júlia Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv machine learning
concrete mix design
generalization ability
compressive strength
concrete database
topic machine learning
concrete mix design
generalization ability
compressive strength
concrete database
description Abstract The compressive strength of concrete is an essential property to ensure the safety of a concrete structure. However, estimating this value is usually a laborious and uncertain process since the mix design is based on empirical methods and its confirmation in the laboratory demands time and resources. In this context, this work aims to evaluate Machine Learning (ML) models to predict the compressive strength of concrete from its constituents. For this purpose, a dataset from the literature was used as input to four ML models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). The accuracy of the models was evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation, and quantified by R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) metrics. Subsequently, a new dataset was put together with mixtures from the literature and used to validate the previous models. In the model creation step, all algorithms obtained similar and positive results, with MAE between 1.96-2.26 MPa and R2 varying from 0.79 to 0.83. However, in the validation step, the accuracy of the models dropped sharply, with MAE growing to 3.04-4.04 MPa and R2 decreasing to 0.37-0.59. ANN and GPR showed the best results, while SVR had the worst predictions. This work showed that ML tools are promising techniques to predict the compressive strength of concrete. However, care must be taken with the input data to guarantee that models are not overfitted to a given region, set of materials, or type of concrete.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952022000500200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952022000500200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1983-41952022000500003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.15 n.5 2022
reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron:IBRACON
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron_str IBRACON
institution IBRACON
reponame_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
collection Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br
_version_ 1754193606811320320