Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azambuja Amaral, Maria Eduarda
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Bruni, Aline Thais
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/819
Resumo: Forensic science contributes to criminal science by using scientific methods, which allow for greater controllability in producing evidence, seeking to reduce the subjectivism inherent in other types of proof. In this scenario, we aim to answer the question: how can the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors contribute to ensuring the rights of the adversarial principle, the entire defense, and legal evidence? The working hypothesis is that knowledge about forensic errors is indispensable for the high quality of expert evidence, resulting in a more coherent, evidential assessment that is more focused on the facts to reduce arbitrariness and judicial errors. To this end, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, with the technique of bibliographic review and reference to jurisprudence. In conclusion, it was possible to show that the scientific community should reflect, discuss and value more rigor in forensic science, prioritizing a clear communication of results to harmonize science, justice, and society.
id IBRASPP-1_04efd07402fb9c5b7234545f71bf0183
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/819
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidenceProva Pericial no Processo Penal: a compreensão e a mitigação dos erros forenses como mecanismo de respeito ao contraditório, à ampla defesa e ao direito à prova lícitaciência forense ciências criminaiserros forensesdireitos humanosForensic sciencecriminal sciencesforensicshuman rightsForensic science contributes to criminal science by using scientific methods, which allow for greater controllability in producing evidence, seeking to reduce the subjectivism inherent in other types of proof. In this scenario, we aim to answer the question: how can the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors contribute to ensuring the rights of the adversarial principle, the entire defense, and legal evidence? The working hypothesis is that knowledge about forensic errors is indispensable for the high quality of expert evidence, resulting in a more coherent, evidential assessment that is more focused on the facts to reduce arbitrariness and judicial errors. To this end, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, with the technique of bibliographic review and reference to jurisprudence. In conclusion, it was possible to show that the scientific community should reflect, discuss and value more rigor in forensic science, prioritizing a clear communication of results to harmonize science, justice, and society.A ciência forense auxilia a compreensão da dinâmica fática a partir do emprego de métodos, que possibilitam uma maior controlabilidade à produção da prova, buscando reduzir o subjetivismo inerente a outros meios de prova. Neste cenário, o que se busca responder é: como a compreensão e a mitigação dos erros forenses pode auxiliar na garantia dos direitos ao contraditório, à ampla defesa e à prova lícita? Como hipótese de trabalho tem-se que o conhecimento sobre os erros forenses é indispensável para a produção de uma prova pericial de maior qualidade, que leve ao julgador um conhecimento especializado de maior confiança, resultando em uma valoração probatória mais coerente e direcionada aos fatos, buscando reduzir o arbítrio e os erros judiciais. Para isso, utilizou-se o método hipotético-dedutivo, com o emprego da técnica de revisão bibliográfica e consulta à jurisprudência. Foi possível demonstrar, ao final, que a comunidade científica deve refletir, discutir e prezar por mais rigor na ciência forense, priorizando uma comunicação clara dos resultados, de modo a integrar ciência, justiça e sociedade de maneira harmônica.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/81910.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.819Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023); 877-912Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2023); 877-912Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 2 (2023); 877-912Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 2 (2023); 877-9122525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/819/497Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Eduarda Azambuja Amaral, Aline Thais Brunihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzambuja Amaral, Maria EduardaBruni, Aline ThaisBruni, Aline Thais2023-06-30T20:26:54Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/819Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-06-30T20:26:54Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
Prova Pericial no Processo Penal: a compreensão e a mitigação dos erros forenses como mecanismo de respeito ao contraditório, à ampla defesa e ao direito à prova lícita
title Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
spellingShingle Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
Azambuja Amaral, Maria Eduarda
ciência forense
ciências criminais
erros forenses
direitos humanos
Forensic science
criminal sciences
forensics
human rights
title_short Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
title_full Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
title_fullStr Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
title_full_unstemmed Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
title_sort Forensic evidence in Criminal Procedure: the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors as a mechanism to promote the adversarial principle, the full defense and the right to legal evidence
author Azambuja Amaral, Maria Eduarda
author_facet Azambuja Amaral, Maria Eduarda
Bruni, Aline Thais
author_role author
author2 Bruni, Aline Thais
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azambuja Amaral, Maria Eduarda
Bruni, Aline Thais
Bruni, Aline Thais
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ciência forense
ciências criminais
erros forenses
direitos humanos
Forensic science
criminal sciences
forensics
human rights
topic ciência forense
ciências criminais
erros forenses
direitos humanos
Forensic science
criminal sciences
forensics
human rights
description Forensic science contributes to criminal science by using scientific methods, which allow for greater controllability in producing evidence, seeking to reduce the subjectivism inherent in other types of proof. In this scenario, we aim to answer the question: how can the comprehension and mitigation of forensic errors contribute to ensuring the rights of the adversarial principle, the entire defense, and legal evidence? The working hypothesis is that knowledge about forensic errors is indispensable for the high quality of expert evidence, resulting in a more coherent, evidential assessment that is more focused on the facts to reduce arbitrariness and judicial errors. To this end, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, with the technique of bibliographic review and reference to jurisprudence. In conclusion, it was possible to show that the scientific community should reflect, discuss and value more rigor in forensic science, prioritizing a clear communication of results to harmonize science, justice, and society.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/819
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.819
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/819
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.819
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/819/497
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Eduarda Azambuja Amaral, Aline Thais Bruni
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Eduarda Azambuja Amaral, Aline Thais Bruni
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023); 877-912
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2023); 877-912
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 2 (2023); 877-912
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 2 (2023); 877-912
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329401173082112

Registros relacionados