Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fricker, Miranda
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/820
Resumo: Although testimonial injustice was originally conceived as a prejudiced and unwarranted reduction of credibility, in this text the concept is expanded according to Jennifer Lackey’s proposal to include excess credibility caused by agential epistemic injustice as part of the concept. Agential epistemic injustice occurs when excessive credibility is attributed to a person’s statements precisely when the subject’s epistemic agency (the condition of acting as a subject of knowledge) has been obstructed. From a concern with institutional reform, the article both examines the context of criminal justice systems that facilitate false confessions and proposes reflections on the changes that are necessary for the implementation of more epistemic justice within those systems.
id IBRASPP-1_2d56d136ebeb278960bc18b1b7b9aff4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/820
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession MythInjustiças Testemunhais Institucionalizadas: A construção do Mito da ConfissãoInjustiça testemunhalinjustiça agencialinjustiça testemunhal institucionalizadaexcesso de credibilidadeTestimonial injusticeagencial Injusticeinstitutionalized testimonial Injusticecredibility excessAlthough testimonial injustice was originally conceived as a prejudiced and unwarranted reduction of credibility, in this text the concept is expanded according to Jennifer Lackey’s proposal to include excess credibility caused by agential epistemic injustice as part of the concept. Agential epistemic injustice occurs when excessive credibility is attributed to a person’s statements precisely when the subject’s epistemic agency (the condition of acting as a subject of knowledge) has been obstructed. From a concern with institutional reform, the article both examines the context of criminal justice systems that facilitate false confessions and proposes reflections on the changes that are necessary for the implementation of more epistemic justice within those systems.Embora as injustiças testemunhais tenham sido pensadas originalmente por Miranda Fricker apenas como redução de credibilidade, neste texto a autora assume a redefinição proposta por Jennifer Lackey para incluir, dentro das injustiças testemunhais, também a hipótese de excesso de credibilidade causada por uma injustiça agencial, isto é, quando a injustiça é cometida por se atribuir excesso de credibilidade a declarações precisamente quando a agência epistêmica do sujeito (as condições de agir como um sujeito de conhecimento) foi obstruída. A partir de sua preocupação com as instituições, Fricker tanto examina o contexto da justiça criminal que propicia as falsas confissões como propõe reflexões sobre as mudanças que são necessárias para a implementação de mais justiça epistêmica no interior dos sistemas de justiça criminal. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/82010.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.820Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 1 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 1 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/820/475Copyright (c) 2023 Miranda Frickerhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFricker, Miranda2023-03-31T13:37:38Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/820Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-03-31T13:37:38Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
Injustiças Testemunhais Institucionalizadas: A construção do Mito da Confissão
title Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
spellingShingle Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
Fricker, Miranda
Injustiça testemunhal
injustiça agencial
injustiça testemunhal institucionalizada
excesso de credibilidade
Testimonial injustice
agencial Injustice
institutionalized testimonial Injustice
credibility excess
title_short Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
title_full Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
title_fullStr Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
title_full_unstemmed Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
title_sort Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth
author Fricker, Miranda
author_facet Fricker, Miranda
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fricker, Miranda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Injustiça testemunhal
injustiça agencial
injustiça testemunhal institucionalizada
excesso de credibilidade
Testimonial injustice
agencial Injustice
institutionalized testimonial Injustice
credibility excess
topic Injustiça testemunhal
injustiça agencial
injustiça testemunhal institucionalizada
excesso de credibilidade
Testimonial injustice
agencial Injustice
institutionalized testimonial Injustice
credibility excess
description Although testimonial injustice was originally conceived as a prejudiced and unwarranted reduction of credibility, in this text the concept is expanded according to Jennifer Lackey’s proposal to include excess credibility caused by agential epistemic injustice as part of the concept. Agential epistemic injustice occurs when excessive credibility is attributed to a person’s statements precisely when the subject’s epistemic agency (the condition of acting as a subject of knowledge) has been obstructed. From a concern with institutional reform, the article both examines the context of criminal justice systems that facilitate false confessions and proposes reflections on the changes that are necessary for the implementation of more epistemic justice within those systems.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/820
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.820
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/820
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.820
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/820/475
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Miranda Fricker
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Miranda Fricker
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 1 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 1 (2023)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329401176227840