Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Paula Ramos, Vitor
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740
Resumo: The present study explores retention interval and post-event information as two potential factors of impact in eyewitness testimony; those factors have been proven scientifically long time ago, but continue to be in the shadows of criminal procedure jurisprudence. The article aims to answer two questions: (i) considering all the scientific evidence available, why do factors as retention interval and post-event information continue to be ignored by the law, and, specifically by the criminal procedure jurisprudence?; (ii) how is it possible to rearrange criminal procedures in order to consider and deal with memory retention interval and post-event information? To do so, in the first part it presents two reasons that contribute to keep those problems in the shadows (presuntivism and false dichotomy between truth and lie); in the second part, it presents the problems; and in the third part it presents three proposals to try to deal with them (immediate production, when possible, and the existence of protocols about the ways of questioning and about the need that interviews are recorded. The methodology used is the analysis of bibliography on psychology and epistemology of testimony, as well as criminal procedure jurisprudence.
id IBRASPP-1_3f9cea456ed31c886d005c3e85707d23
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/740
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to doPresuntivismo e falsa contraposição entre mentira e verdade: duas possíveis causas para seguirmos ignorando o impacto de fatores como a passagem do tempo e as informações pós-evento no processo penal. : Três propostas sobre o que fazer.Prova testemunhalPsicologia do Testemunho. Raciocínio ProbatórioEyewitness testimony Evidential reasoningPsychology of Testimony.The present study explores retention interval and post-event information as two potential factors of impact in eyewitness testimony; those factors have been proven scientifically long time ago, but continue to be in the shadows of criminal procedure jurisprudence. The article aims to answer two questions: (i) considering all the scientific evidence available, why do factors as retention interval and post-event information continue to be ignored by the law, and, specifically by the criminal procedure jurisprudence?; (ii) how is it possible to rearrange criminal procedures in order to consider and deal with memory retention interval and post-event information? To do so, in the first part it presents two reasons that contribute to keep those problems in the shadows (presuntivism and false dichotomy between truth and lie); in the second part, it presents the problems; and in the third part it presents three proposals to try to deal with them (immediate production, when possible, and the existence of protocols about the ways of questioning and about the need that interviews are recorded. The methodology used is the analysis of bibliography on psychology and epistemology of testimony, as well as criminal procedure jurisprudence.O presente estudo aborda a passagem do tempo e a informação pós-evento como dois fatores com potencial impacto na prova testemunhal que, apesar de provados cientificamente há tempos, seguem sem tratamento adequado no processo penal. O artigo pretende responder a dois questionamentos: (i) por que, diante de tantas evidências científicas, fatores como a passagem do tempo e as informações pós-evento seguem sendo ignorados pelo direito e, especificamente, pelo processo penal?; (ii) como é possível desenhar o processo penal para que esse passe a considerar e a lidar com a passagem do tempo e com as informações pós-evento? Para isso, na primeira parte, são apontadas duas razões que contribuem para manter tais problemas ocultos (presuntivismo e falsa dicotomia entre verdade e mentira); na segunda parte, são apresentados os problemas; e na terceira parte são formuladas três propostas para buscar lidar com esses (produção imediata, quando possível, e existência de protocolos quanto à forma de fazer perguntas e à necessidade de gravação. A metodologia utilizada é a revisão bibliográfica de escritos da psicologia do testemunho, da epistemologia do testemunho e da doutrina do processo penal.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2022-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/74010.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 3 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 3 (2022)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740/463Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor de Paula Ramoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paula Ramos, Vitor2022-10-29T14:04:35Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/740Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2022-10-29T14:04:35Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
Presuntivismo e falsa contraposição entre mentira e verdade: duas possíveis causas para seguirmos ignorando o impacto de fatores como a passagem do tempo e as informações pós-evento no processo penal. : Três propostas sobre o que fazer.
title Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
spellingShingle Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
de Paula Ramos, Vitor
Prova testemunhal
Psicologia do Testemunho.
Raciocínio Probatório
Eyewitness testimony
Evidential reasoning
Psychology of Testimony.
title_short Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
title_full Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
title_fullStr Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
title_full_unstemmed Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
title_sort Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
author de Paula Ramos, Vitor
author_facet de Paula Ramos, Vitor
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Paula Ramos, Vitor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prova testemunhal
Psicologia do Testemunho.
Raciocínio Probatório
Eyewitness testimony
Evidential reasoning
Psychology of Testimony.
topic Prova testemunhal
Psicologia do Testemunho.
Raciocínio Probatório
Eyewitness testimony
Evidential reasoning
Psychology of Testimony.
description The present study explores retention interval and post-event information as two potential factors of impact in eyewitness testimony; those factors have been proven scientifically long time ago, but continue to be in the shadows of criminal procedure jurisprudence. The article aims to answer two questions: (i) considering all the scientific evidence available, why do factors as retention interval and post-event information continue to be ignored by the law, and, specifically by the criminal procedure jurisprudence?; (ii) how is it possible to rearrange criminal procedures in order to consider and deal with memory retention interval and post-event information? To do so, in the first part it presents two reasons that contribute to keep those problems in the shadows (presuntivism and false dichotomy between truth and lie); in the second part, it presents the problems; and in the third part it presents three proposals to try to deal with them (immediate production, when possible, and the existence of protocols about the ways of questioning and about the need that interviews are recorded. The methodology used is the analysis of bibliography on psychology and epistemology of testimony, as well as criminal procedure jurisprudence.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740/463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor de Paula Ramos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor de Paula Ramos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 3 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 3 (2022)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402981875712

Registros relacionados