Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Parra Lara, Francisco José
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351
Resumo: Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering state appropriation as a punishment, authority, right to a faculty. Today the asset recovery, by constitutional mandate, is considered a civil and autonomous act nature through by all means the State must become the possessor of all assets whose legitimate origin cannot be proven. This by all means is a figure whose origin and constitutional proceedings becomes controversial.
id IBRASPP-1_48b573825d846af655e532364f5252de
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/351
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional StructureExtinción de Dominio en México: Revisión de su estructura constitucional y convencionalExtinción de Dominio en México: Revisión de su estructura constitucional y convencionalConstitutionforcingAsset Recovery Lawnational law.Constitucióndecomisoextinción de dominioley nacional.Constitucióndecomisoextinción de dominioley nacional.Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering state appropriation as a punishment, authority, right to a faculty. Today the asset recovery, by constitutional mandate, is considered a civil and autonomous act nature through by all means the State must become the possessor of all assets whose legitimate origin cannot be proven. This by all means is a figure whose origin and constitutional proceedings becomes controversial.Atendiendo a su historia constitucional, México ha aludido, en lo general, al bien común y al orden público, como el fundamento para que el Estado se apropie de los bienes considerados, lato sensu, como ilícitos. Lo que ha cambiado a lo largo del tiempo, radicalmente en ciertos casos, es el considerar a la apropiación estatal una pena, sanción, derecho o facultad, así como la vía en que aquella habría de hacerse valer. Hoy en día la extinción de dominio, por mandato constitucional expreso, es la acción, cuya substanciación es de índole civil y autónoma, por medio de la cual el Estado habrá de hacerse del patrimonio cuya legítima procedencia no pueda acreditarse. Figura cuya construcción, tanto constitucional como convencional y legal, deviene en polémica.Atendiendo a su historia constitucional, México ha aludido, en lo general, al bien común y al orden público, como el fundamento para que el Estado se apropie de los bienes considerados, lato sensu, como ilícitos. Lo que ha cambiado a lo largo del tiempo, radicalmente en ciertos casos, es el considerar a la apropiación estatal una pena, sanción, derecho o facultad, así como la vía en que aquella habría de hacerse valer. Hoy en día la extinción de dominio, por mandato constitucional expreso, es la acción, cuya substanciación es de índole civil y autónoma, por medio de la cual el Estado habrá de hacerse del patrimonio cuya legítima procedencia no pueda acreditarse. Figura cuya construcción, tanto constitucional como convencional y legal, deviene en polémica.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/35110.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.351Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 667-700Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 667-700Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 667-700Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 667-7002525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351/220https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351/249Copyright (c) 2020 Francisco José Parra Larainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParra Lara, Francisco José2020-09-29T10:15:13Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/351Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-09-29T10:15:13Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
Extinción de Dominio en México: Revisión de su estructura constitucional y convencional
Extinción de Dominio en México: Revisión de su estructura constitucional y convencional
title Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
spellingShingle Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
Parra Lara, Francisco José
Constitution
forcing
Asset Recovery Law
national law.
Constitución
decomiso
extinción de dominio
ley nacional.
Constitución
decomiso
extinción de dominio
ley nacional.
title_short Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
title_full Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
title_fullStr Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
title_full_unstemmed Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
title_sort Asset Recovery Law in Mexico : Revision of its Constitutional and Conventional Structure
author Parra Lara, Francisco José
author_facet Parra Lara, Francisco José
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Parra Lara, Francisco José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitution
forcing
Asset Recovery Law
national law.
Constitución
decomiso
extinción de dominio
ley nacional.
Constitución
decomiso
extinción de dominio
ley nacional.
topic Constitution
forcing
Asset Recovery Law
national law.
Constitución
decomiso
extinción de dominio
ley nacional.
Constitución
decomiso
extinción de dominio
ley nacional.
description Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering state appropriation as a punishment, authority, right to a faculty. Today the asset recovery, by constitutional mandate, is considered a civil and autonomous act nature through by all means the State must become the possessor of all assets whose legitimate origin cannot be proven. This by all means is a figure whose origin and constitutional proceedings becomes controversial.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.351
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351/220
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/351/249
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Francisco José Parra Lara
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Francisco José Parra Lara
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 667-700
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 667-700
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 667-700
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 667-700
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402350632960

Registros relacionados