Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lourenço, Aline de Araújo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, Erick Simões da Camara e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the relationship between expert evidence and wrongful convictions. It is a topic that is still little explored in Brazil, but with a wide debate in the USA. For this reason, it is used as the basis of the American model to answer the following questions: 1) What are the main American associations and databases related to the reversals of wrongful convictions? 2) What are the reflexes of the American approach in United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil? 3) How do expert evidence relate to wrongful convictions? 4) Are there criteria applicable to expert evidence that can be implemented in Brazil in order to reduce the chance of expert errors and misinterpretation by the judges? It is expected to present the point and the counterpoint in the use of expert evidence, to address the merits of associations that seek to reverse wrongful convictions and to suggest criteria to improve the way the experts dialogue with the judges.
id IBRASPP-1_4b536c159cdd6630631ef85b9d9b7468
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/410
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errorsConsiderações sobre as condenações injustas fundamentadas em provas periciais: análise do Innocence Project, do National Registry of Exoneration e mecanismos para redução de erros periciaisProofExpertConvictionInnocence.ProvaPericialCondenaçãoInocência.This article aims to analyze the relationship between expert evidence and wrongful convictions. It is a topic that is still little explored in Brazil, but with a wide debate in the USA. For this reason, it is used as the basis of the American model to answer the following questions: 1) What are the main American associations and databases related to the reversals of wrongful convictions? 2) What are the reflexes of the American approach in United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil? 3) How do expert evidence relate to wrongful convictions? 4) Are there criteria applicable to expert evidence that can be implemented in Brazil in order to reduce the chance of expert errors and misinterpretation by the judges? It is expected to present the point and the counterpoint in the use of expert evidence, to address the merits of associations that seek to reverse wrongful convictions and to suggest criteria to improve the way the experts dialogue with the judges.Este artigo pretende analisar a relação entre as provas periciais e as condenações injustas. Trata-se de tema ainda pouco explorado no Brasil, mas com amplo debate nos EUA. Por essa razão, utiliza-se como base o modelo estadunidense para responder às seguintes questões: 1) Quais são as principais organizações e bases de dados estadunidenses relacionadas às reversões de condenações injustas? 2) Quais os reflexos da abordagem estadunidense no Reino Unido, no Canadá e no Brasil? 3) Como as provas periciais relacionam-se às condenações injustas? 4) Existem critérios aplicáveis às provas periciais que possam ser implantados no Brasil com vistas a diminuir a chance de erros periciais e interpretações equivocadas por parte dos julgadores? Espera-se apresentar o ponto e o contraponto no uso da prova pericial, abordar o mérito de organizações que buscam reverter condenações injustas e sugerir critérios para aprimorar a forma como os peritos dialogam com os julgadores.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2021-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/41010.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.410Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 567Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 567Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 567Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 5672525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410/340https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410/361Copyright (c) 2021 Aline de Araújo Lourenço, Erick Simões da Camara e Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLourenço, Aline de AraújoSilva, Erick Simões da Camara e2021-05-03T10:30:22Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/410Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-05-03T10:30:22Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
Considerações sobre as condenações injustas fundamentadas em provas periciais: análise do Innocence Project, do National Registry of Exoneration e mecanismos para redução de erros periciais
title Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
spellingShingle Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
Lourenço, Aline de Araújo
Proof
Expert
Conviction
Innocence.
Prova
Pericial
Condenação
Inocência.
title_short Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
title_full Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
title_fullStr Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
title_full_unstemmed Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
title_sort Considerations on wrongful conviction based on forensic evidence: analysis by the Innocence Project, the National Registry of Exoneration and mechanisms for reducing forensic errors
author Lourenço, Aline de Araújo
author_facet Lourenço, Aline de Araújo
Silva, Erick Simões da Camara e
author_role author
author2 Silva, Erick Simões da Camara e
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lourenço, Aline de Araújo
Silva, Erick Simões da Camara e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Proof
Expert
Conviction
Innocence.
Prova
Pericial
Condenação
Inocência.
topic Proof
Expert
Conviction
Innocence.
Prova
Pericial
Condenação
Inocência.
description This article aims to analyze the relationship between expert evidence and wrongful convictions. It is a topic that is still little explored in Brazil, but with a wide debate in the USA. For this reason, it is used as the basis of the American model to answer the following questions: 1) What are the main American associations and databases related to the reversals of wrongful convictions? 2) What are the reflexes of the American approach in United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil? 3) How do expert evidence relate to wrongful convictions? 4) Are there criteria applicable to expert evidence that can be implemented in Brazil in order to reduce the chance of expert errors and misinterpretation by the judges? It is expected to present the point and the counterpoint in the use of expert evidence, to address the merits of associations that seek to reverse wrongful convictions and to suggest criteria to improve the way the experts dialogue with the judges.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.410
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.410
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410/340
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/410/361
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Aline de Araújo Lourenço, Erick Simões da Camara e Silva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Aline de Araújo Lourenço, Erick Simões da Camara e Silva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 567
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 567
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 567
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 567
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941037383680

Registros relacionados