Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Letelier Loyola, Enrique
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/224
Resumo: The resurgence of the victim, as a topic of interest for criminological sciences and criminal law, has caused the need to question whether traditional criminal justice models are adequate to satisfy their interests, considering that it is a protagonist of the criminal conflict. Collecting some restorative experiences and with the support of the most modern victimology, the criminal justice systems stop focusing only on the punishment of the offender and open themselves to the adoption of restorative justice programs, which recognize in the victim a subject holder of the right to the repair of the damage.
id IBRASPP-1_4fe4129edc515185c4fdeb3f5f63af77
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/224
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solutionEditorial del Dossier “Medios alternativos, consensos y la participación de la víctima en el proceso penal”: Participación de la víctima en la solución del conflicto penalEditorial do dossiê “Meios alternativos, consenso e a participação da vítima no processo penal”: Participação da vítima na solução do conflito penalvictimpunishing modelrepair of criminal damagerestorative justice.víctimajusticia retributivareparación del dañojusticia restaurativa.vítimajustiça retributivareparação do danojustiça restaurativa.The resurgence of the victim, as a topic of interest for criminological sciences and criminal law, has caused the need to question whether traditional criminal justice models are adequate to satisfy their interests, considering that it is a protagonist of the criminal conflict. Collecting some restorative experiences and with the support of the most modern victimology, the criminal justice systems stop focusing only on the punishment of the offender and open themselves to the adoption of restorative justice programs, which recognize in the victim a subject holder of the right to the repair of the damage.El resurgimiento de la víctima, como sujeto de interés para las ciencias criminológicas y el derecho penal,ha provocado la necesidad de cuestionarse si los tradicionales modelos de justicia penal son adecuados para satisfacer sus intereses, considerando que se trata de un protagonista del conflicto penal. Recogiendo diversas experiencias restaurativas y con apoyo de la victimología más moderna, los sistemas de justicia penal dejan de enfocarse solo en el castigo al infractor penal y se abren a la adopción de programas de justicia restaurativa, que reconocen en la víctima un sujeto titular del derecho a la reparación del daño.El resurgimiento de la víctima, como sujeto de interés para las ciencias criminológicas y el derecho penal,ha provocado la necesidad de cuestionarse si los tradicionales modelos de justicia penal son adecuados para satisfacer sus intereses, considerando que se trata de un protagonista del conflicto penal. Recogiendo diversas experiencias restaurativas y con apoyo de la victimología más moderna, los sistemas de justicia penal dejan de enfocarse solo en el castigo al infractor penal y se abren a la adopción de programas de justicia restaurativa, que reconocen en la víctima un sujeto titular del derecho a la reparación del daño.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2019-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/22410.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.224Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 13-32Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 13-32Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 13-32Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 13-322525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/224/148Copyright (c) 2019 Enrique Letelier Loyolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLetelier Loyola, Enrique2020-07-20T07:42:33Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/224Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-07-20T07:42:33Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
Editorial del Dossier “Medios alternativos, consensos y la participación de la víctima en el proceso penal”: Participación de la víctima en la solución del conflicto penal
Editorial do dossiê “Meios alternativos, consenso e a participação da vítima no processo penal”: Participação da vítima na solução do conflito penal
title Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
spellingShingle Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
Letelier Loyola, Enrique
victim
punishing model
repair of criminal damage
restorative justice.
víctima
justicia retributiva
reparación del daño
justicia restaurativa.
vítima
justiça retributiva
reparação do dano
justiça restaurativa.
title_short Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
title_full Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
title_fullStr Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
title_full_unstemmed Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
title_sort Editorial of Dossier “Alternative methods, consensus and the role of the victim in criminal procedure law”: Victim participation in the penal conflict solution
author Letelier Loyola, Enrique
author_facet Letelier Loyola, Enrique
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Letelier Loyola, Enrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv victim
punishing model
repair of criminal damage
restorative justice.
víctima
justicia retributiva
reparación del daño
justicia restaurativa.
vítima
justiça retributiva
reparação do dano
justiça restaurativa.
topic victim
punishing model
repair of criminal damage
restorative justice.
víctima
justicia retributiva
reparación del daño
justicia restaurativa.
vítima
justiça retributiva
reparação do dano
justiça restaurativa.
description The resurgence of the victim, as a topic of interest for criminological sciences and criminal law, has caused the need to question whether traditional criminal justice models are adequate to satisfy their interests, considering that it is a protagonist of the criminal conflict. Collecting some restorative experiences and with the support of the most modern victimology, the criminal justice systems stop focusing only on the punishment of the offender and open themselves to the adoption of restorative justice programs, which recognize in the victim a subject holder of the right to the repair of the damage.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/224
10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.224
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/224
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.224
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/224/148
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Enrique Letelier Loyola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Enrique Letelier Loyola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 13-32
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 13-32
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 13-32
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 13-32
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281940394606592

Registros relacionados