Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fayet, Fábio Agne
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Poll, Roberta Eggert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/143
Resumo: The theme of this article is the persecutory mood of the magistrate in disfavor of the accused. The object of analysis of the work is the verification of the breach of the duty of impartiality of the magistrate when analyzing the records, through the application of successive understandings contrary to the interests of the accused. The research hypothesis is the verification of the existence or not of a duty of impartiality of the magistrate before motivated decisions, given in the independent exercise of the jurisdictional activity and can be challenged by autonomous action or action, with clear persecutory character. The method of approach will be deductive, adopting as a bibliographical procedure. Firstly, this article proposes a reading on the impartiality and protagonism of the magistrate in order to indicate how contemporary literature has been seeing the judge's position vis-à-vis the accused, and then to analyze the issue of breach of the duty of impartiality before successive decisions that translate into a persecutory performance of the judge.
id IBRASPP-1_7e1e9879dffcdda88ade21ef64f71ccd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/143
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidenceÂnimo persecutório do magistrado: a quebra do dever de imparcialidade e sucessivas decisões contrárias ao direito à prova defensivaImpartialityJudgePersecutory moodMotivationRight to proof.ImparcialidadeJulgadorÂnimo persecutórioMotivaçãoDireito à prova.The theme of this article is the persecutory mood of the magistrate in disfavor of the accused. The object of analysis of the work is the verification of the breach of the duty of impartiality of the magistrate when analyzing the records, through the application of successive understandings contrary to the interests of the accused. The research hypothesis is the verification of the existence or not of a duty of impartiality of the magistrate before motivated decisions, given in the independent exercise of the jurisdictional activity and can be challenged by autonomous action or action, with clear persecutory character. The method of approach will be deductive, adopting as a bibliographical procedure. Firstly, this article proposes a reading on the impartiality and protagonism of the magistrate in order to indicate how contemporary literature has been seeing the judge's position vis-à-vis the accused, and then to analyze the issue of breach of the duty of impartiality before successive decisions that translate into a persecutory performance of the judge.O tema do presente artigo é o ânimo persecutório do magistrado em desfavor do acusado. O objeto de análise do trabalho é a verificação da quebra do dever de imparcialidade do magistrado quando da análise dos autos, mediante a aplicação de sucessivos entendimentos contrários aos interesses do acusado. O objetivo de pesquisa é a verificação da existência ou não de um dever de imparcialidade do magistrado diante de decisões motivadas, proferidas no exercício independente da atividade jurisdicional e impugnáveis por recurso ou ação autônoma, com nítido caráter persecutório. O método de abordagem será o dedutivo, adotando-se como procedimento o bibliográfico. Destarte, em primeiro, propõe, o presente artigo, uma leitura sobre a imparcialidade e o protagonismo do magistrado de modo a indicar como a literatura contemporânea vem enxergando a postura do juiz frente ao acusado, para, depois, analisar-se a questão da quebra do dever de imparcialidade diante de sucessivas decisões que se traduzem em uma atuação persecutória do juiz.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/14310.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.143Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 645-667Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 645-667Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 645-667Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 645-6672525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/143/123Copyright (c) 2018 Roberta Eggert Poll, Fábio Agne Fayetinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFayet, Fábio AgnePoll, Roberta Eggert2018-06-17T21:16:42Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/143Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-06-17T21:16:42Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
Ânimo persecutório do magistrado: a quebra do dever de imparcialidade e sucessivas decisões contrárias ao direito à prova defensiva
title Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
spellingShingle Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
Fayet, Fábio Agne
Impartiality
Judge
Persecutory mood
Motivation
Right to proof.
Imparcialidade
Julgador
Ânimo persecutório
Motivação
Direito à prova.
title_short Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
title_full Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
title_fullStr Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
title_full_unstemmed Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
title_sort Persecutory of the judge: breach of the duty of impartiality and successive decisions contrary to the right to defensive evidence
author Fayet, Fábio Agne
author_facet Fayet, Fábio Agne
Poll, Roberta Eggert
author_role author
author2 Poll, Roberta Eggert
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fayet, Fábio Agne
Poll, Roberta Eggert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Impartiality
Judge
Persecutory mood
Motivation
Right to proof.
Imparcialidade
Julgador
Ânimo persecutório
Motivação
Direito à prova.
topic Impartiality
Judge
Persecutory mood
Motivation
Right to proof.
Imparcialidade
Julgador
Ânimo persecutório
Motivação
Direito à prova.
description The theme of this article is the persecutory mood of the magistrate in disfavor of the accused. The object of analysis of the work is the verification of the breach of the duty of impartiality of the magistrate when analyzing the records, through the application of successive understandings contrary to the interests of the accused. The research hypothesis is the verification of the existence or not of a duty of impartiality of the magistrate before motivated decisions, given in the independent exercise of the jurisdictional activity and can be challenged by autonomous action or action, with clear persecutory character. The method of approach will be deductive, adopting as a bibliographical procedure. Firstly, this article proposes a reading on the impartiality and protagonism of the magistrate in order to indicate how contemporary literature has been seeing the judge's position vis-à-vis the accused, and then to analyze the issue of breach of the duty of impartiality before successive decisions that translate into a persecutory performance of the judge.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/143
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.143
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/143
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.143
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/143/123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Roberta Eggert Poll, Fábio Agne Fayet
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Roberta Eggert Poll, Fábio Agne Fayet
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 645-667
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 645-667
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 645-667
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 645-667
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939980419072