Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos, Aline
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Poll, Roberta Eggert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/153
Resumo: This essay aims to analyze judicial activism as tool of domination and decision-making. The theme of this article is the magistrate's performance as a legislator through the adoption a creative and innovative approach to criminal proceedings. The object of analysis of the work is verify the (in)compatibility of judicial activism as a mechanism as a tool for control decisions in the Brazilian criminal-legal system. The hypothesis of research revolves around the question of the violation of the democratic foundation and the very development of the judicial function. how are the rights of the law compatible with the democratic process with the practice of judicial activism? The method of approach will be deductive, adopting as a bibliographical procedure. Firstly, this article proposes a reading on the concept of the judge-legislator and, afterwards, to analyze the question of the use of the phenomenon of judicial activism by the magistrates of first instance as a tool to control their decisions.
id IBRASPP-1_81c8222680953be5c49ad0dde5b54520
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/153
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practiceBreve ensaio sobre a legitimidade do ativismo judicial no processo penal: limites e consolidação como prática jurídicaJudicial activismControlSeparation of powersNeo-constitutionalism.Ativismo judicialControleDecisãoSeparação dos poderesNeoconstitucionalismo.This essay aims to analyze judicial activism as tool of domination and decision-making. The theme of this article is the magistrate's performance as a legislator through the adoption a creative and innovative approach to criminal proceedings. The object of analysis of the work is verify the (in)compatibility of judicial activism as a mechanism as a tool for control decisions in the Brazilian criminal-legal system. The hypothesis of research revolves around the question of the violation of the democratic foundation and the very development of the judicial function. how are the rights of the law compatible with the democratic process with the practice of judicial activism? The method of approach will be deductive, adopting as a bibliographical procedure. Firstly, this article proposes a reading on the concept of the judge-legislator and, afterwards, to analyze the question of the use of the phenomenon of judicial activism by the magistrates of first instance as a tool to control their decisions.O presente ensaio visa a analisar o ativismo judicial como ferramenta de controle das manifestações judiciais. O tema do artigo é a atuação do magistrado como legislador por meio da adoção de uma postura criativa e inovadora frente ao processo penal. O objeto de análise do trabalho é verificação da (in)compatibilidade do ativismo judicial como ferramenta de controle e convicção das decisões no sistema jurídico-penal brasileiro. A hipótese de pesquisa gira em torno da questão relativa à violação ao fundamento democrático e o próprio desenvolvimento da função judicante. Isto é, como os intérpretes da lei compatibilizam o processo político democrático com a prática do ativismo judicial? O método de abordagem será o dedutivo, adotando-se como procedimento o bibliográfico. Destarte, em primeiro, propõe, o presente artigo, uma leitura sobre o conceito de ativismo e os principais problemas de utilização desta ferramenta para, ao depois, analisar-se a questão da utilização do fenômeno do ativismo judicial pelos magistrados de primeira instância como ferramenta de domínio de suas decisões.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/15310.22197/rbdpp.v4i3.153Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018); 1217-1246Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2018); 1217-1246Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 3 (2018); 1217-1246Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 3 (2018); 1217-12462525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/153/132Copyright (c) 2018 Aline Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos; Roberta Eggert Pollinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPires de Souza Machado de Castilhos, AlinePoll, Roberta Eggert2018-10-31T21:13:56Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/153Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-10-31T21:13:56Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
Breve ensaio sobre a legitimidade do ativismo judicial no processo penal: limites e consolidação como prática jurídica
title Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
spellingShingle Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos, Aline
Judicial activism
Control
Separation of powers
Neo-constitutionalism.
Ativismo judicial
Controle
Decisão
Separação dos poderes
Neoconstitucionalismo.
title_short Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
title_full Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
title_fullStr Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
title_full_unstemmed Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
title_sort Brief essay about the legitimacy of judicial activism in criminal procedure: limits and consolidation as legal practice
author Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos, Aline
author_facet Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos, Aline
Poll, Roberta Eggert
author_role author
author2 Poll, Roberta Eggert
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos, Aline
Poll, Roberta Eggert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicial activism
Control
Separation of powers
Neo-constitutionalism.
Ativismo judicial
Controle
Decisão
Separação dos poderes
Neoconstitucionalismo.
topic Judicial activism
Control
Separation of powers
Neo-constitutionalism.
Ativismo judicial
Controle
Decisão
Separação dos poderes
Neoconstitucionalismo.
description This essay aims to analyze judicial activism as tool of domination and decision-making. The theme of this article is the magistrate's performance as a legislator through the adoption a creative and innovative approach to criminal proceedings. The object of analysis of the work is verify the (in)compatibility of judicial activism as a mechanism as a tool for control decisions in the Brazilian criminal-legal system. The hypothesis of research revolves around the question of the violation of the democratic foundation and the very development of the judicial function. how are the rights of the law compatible with the democratic process with the practice of judicial activism? The method of approach will be deductive, adopting as a bibliographical procedure. Firstly, this article proposes a reading on the concept of the judge-legislator and, afterwards, to analyze the question of the use of the phenomenon of judicial activism by the magistrates of first instance as a tool to control their decisions.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/153
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3.153
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/153
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3.153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/153/132
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Aline Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos; Roberta Eggert Poll
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Aline Pires de Souza Machado de Castilhos; Roberta Eggert Poll
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018); 1217-1246
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2018); 1217-1246
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 3 (2018); 1217-1246
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 3 (2018); 1217-1246
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939984613376

Registros relacionados