The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Solodov, Denis
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/785
Resumo: In the article, the author addresses the issue of the judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal proceedings. Over the years, the reliance of the criminal justice system on experts increased dramatically. Nowadays, expert evidence plays a pivotal role in court disputes, directly influencing the outcome of judicial proceedings. Experience, however, shows that erroneous expert reports and flawed testimonies may lead to erroneous judicial decisions inflicting irreparable personal and social harm. Unfortunately, the existing model of forensic expert services in Poland is not prone to manipulations and in its current shape cannot guarantee the reliability of expert evidence. Several procedural and structural solutions have been proposed to enhance the credibility of court-appointed experts over recent years. The author examines their advantages and limitations to identify the ones that are realistic and workable.
id IBRASPP-1_b00d6c99664b1bb302d90be9cc39a66c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/785
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedureA valoração judicial da prova pericial no processo penal polonêscriminal proceedingsevidence admissibilityexpert evidence assessmentexpert report and testimonymeta-expertcourt scientific advisersprocesso penaladmissibilidade da provavaloração de prova periciallaudo pericial e depoimentometa-especialistaperitos do tribunalIn the article, the author addresses the issue of the judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal proceedings. Over the years, the reliance of the criminal justice system on experts increased dramatically. Nowadays, expert evidence plays a pivotal role in court disputes, directly influencing the outcome of judicial proceedings. Experience, however, shows that erroneous expert reports and flawed testimonies may lead to erroneous judicial decisions inflicting irreparable personal and social harm. Unfortunately, the existing model of forensic expert services in Poland is not prone to manipulations and in its current shape cannot guarantee the reliability of expert evidence. Several procedural and structural solutions have been proposed to enhance the credibility of court-appointed experts over recent years. The author examines their advantages and limitations to identify the ones that are realistic and workable.Neste artigo, aborda-se a questão da valoração judicial da prova pericial no processo penal polonês. Ao longo dos anos, a confiança do sistema de justiça criminal em especialistas aumentou dramaticamente. Atualmente, a prova pericial desempenha um papel fundamental nos processos judiciais, influenciando diretamente o resultado dos casos. A experiência, no entanto, mostra que laudos periciais e depoimentos errôneos podem levar a decisões judiciais equivocadas, causando danos pessoais e sociais irreparáveis. Infelizmente, o modelo existente de serviços periciais forenses na Polônia não é isento a manipulações e, em sua forma atual, não pode garantir a confiabilidade das provas periciais. Diante disso, propõe-se várias soluções processuais e estruturais para aumentar a credibilidade dos peritos nomeados pelo tribunal. Assim, são examinadas as suas vantagens e limitações para identificar aquelas que são realistas e viáveis.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/78510.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.785Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 1 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 1 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPenghttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/785/486Copyright (c) 2023 Denis Solodovhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSolodov, Denis2023-03-31T13:37:40Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/785Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-03-31T13:37:40Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
A valoração judicial da prova pericial no processo penal polonês
title The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
spellingShingle The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
Solodov, Denis
criminal proceedings
evidence admissibility
expert evidence assessment
expert report and testimony
meta-expert
court scientific advisers
processo penal
admissibilidade da prova
valoração de prova pericial
laudo pericial e depoimento
meta-especialista
peritos do tribunal
title_short The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
title_full The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
title_fullStr The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
title_full_unstemmed The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
title_sort The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
author Solodov, Denis
author_facet Solodov, Denis
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Solodov, Denis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv criminal proceedings
evidence admissibility
expert evidence assessment
expert report and testimony
meta-expert
court scientific advisers
processo penal
admissibilidade da prova
valoração de prova pericial
laudo pericial e depoimento
meta-especialista
peritos do tribunal
topic criminal proceedings
evidence admissibility
expert evidence assessment
expert report and testimony
meta-expert
court scientific advisers
processo penal
admissibilidade da prova
valoração de prova pericial
laudo pericial e depoimento
meta-especialista
peritos do tribunal
description In the article, the author addresses the issue of the judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal proceedings. Over the years, the reliance of the criminal justice system on experts increased dramatically. Nowadays, expert evidence plays a pivotal role in court disputes, directly influencing the outcome of judicial proceedings. Experience, however, shows that erroneous expert reports and flawed testimonies may lead to erroneous judicial decisions inflicting irreparable personal and social harm. Unfortunately, the existing model of forensic expert services in Poland is not prone to manipulations and in its current shape cannot guarantee the reliability of expert evidence. Several procedural and structural solutions have been proposed to enhance the credibility of court-appointed experts over recent years. The author examines their advantages and limitations to identify the ones that are realistic and workable.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/785
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.785
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/785
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.785
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/785/486
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Denis Solodov
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Denis Solodov
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 1 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 1 (2023)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941716860928

Registros relacionados