Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
DOI: | 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740 |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740 |
Resumo: | The present study explores retention interval and post-event information as two potential factors of impact in eyewitness testimony; those factors have been proven scientifically long time ago, but continue to be in the shadows of criminal procedure jurisprudence. The article aims to answer two questions: (i) considering all the scientific evidence available, why do factors as retention interval and post-event information continue to be ignored by the law, and, specifically by the criminal procedure jurisprudence?; (ii) how is it possible to rearrange criminal procedures in order to consider and deal with memory retention interval and post-event information? To do so, in the first part it presents two reasons that contribute to keep those problems in the shadows (presuntivism and false dichotomy between truth and lie); in the second part, it presents the problems; and in the third part it presents three proposals to try to deal with them (immediate production, when possible, and the existence of protocols about the ways of questioning and about the need that interviews are recorded. The methodology used is the analysis of bibliography on psychology and epistemology of testimony, as well as criminal procedure jurisprudence. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_c864187d552fd98455884f986674df67 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/740 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
spelling |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to doPresuntivismo e falsa contraposição entre mentira e verdade: duas possíveis causas para seguirmos ignorando o impacto de fatores como a passagem do tempo e as informações pós-evento no processo penal. : Três propostas sobre o que fazer.Prova testemunhalPsicologia do Testemunho. Raciocínio ProbatórioEyewitness testimony Evidential reasoningPsychology of Testimony.The present study explores retention interval and post-event information as two potential factors of impact in eyewitness testimony; those factors have been proven scientifically long time ago, but continue to be in the shadows of criminal procedure jurisprudence. The article aims to answer two questions: (i) considering all the scientific evidence available, why do factors as retention interval and post-event information continue to be ignored by the law, and, specifically by the criminal procedure jurisprudence?; (ii) how is it possible to rearrange criminal procedures in order to consider and deal with memory retention interval and post-event information? To do so, in the first part it presents two reasons that contribute to keep those problems in the shadows (presuntivism and false dichotomy between truth and lie); in the second part, it presents the problems; and in the third part it presents three proposals to try to deal with them (immediate production, when possible, and the existence of protocols about the ways of questioning and about the need that interviews are recorded. The methodology used is the analysis of bibliography on psychology and epistemology of testimony, as well as criminal procedure jurisprudence.O presente estudo aborda a passagem do tempo e a informação pós-evento como dois fatores com potencial impacto na prova testemunhal que, apesar de provados cientificamente há tempos, seguem sem tratamento adequado no processo penal. O artigo pretende responder a dois questionamentos: (i) por que, diante de tantas evidências científicas, fatores como a passagem do tempo e as informações pós-evento seguem sendo ignorados pelo direito e, especificamente, pelo processo penal?; (ii) como é possível desenhar o processo penal para que esse passe a considerar e a lidar com a passagem do tempo e com as informações pós-evento? Para isso, na primeira parte, são apontadas duas razões que contribuem para manter tais problemas ocultos (presuntivismo e falsa dicotomia entre verdade e mentira); na segunda parte, são apresentados os problemas; e na terceira parte são formuladas três propostas para buscar lidar com esses (produção imediata, quando possível, e existência de protocolos quanto à forma de fazer perguntas e à necessidade de gravação. A metodologia utilizada é a revisão bibliográfica de escritos da psicologia do testemunho, da epistemologia do testemunho e da doutrina do processo penal.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2022-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/74010.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 3 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 3 (2022)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740/463Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor de Paula Ramoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paula Ramos, Vitor2022-10-29T14:04:41Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/740Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2022-10-29T14:04:41Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do Presuntivismo e falsa contraposição entre mentira e verdade: duas possíveis causas para seguirmos ignorando o impacto de fatores como a passagem do tempo e as informações pós-evento no processo penal. : Três propostas sobre o que fazer. |
title |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do |
spellingShingle |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do de Paula Ramos, Vitor Prova testemunhal Psicologia do Testemunho. Raciocínio Probatório Eyewitness testimony Evidential reasoning Psychology of Testimony. de Paula Ramos, Vitor Prova testemunhal Psicologia do Testemunho. Raciocínio Probatório Eyewitness testimony Evidential reasoning Psychology of Testimony. |
title_short |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do |
title_full |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do |
title_fullStr |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do |
title_full_unstemmed |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do |
title_sort |
Presuntivism and false dichotomy between lie and truth: two possible reasons why we continue to ignore the impact of factors such as retention interval and post-event information in criminal procedure.: Three proposals about what to do |
author |
de Paula Ramos, Vitor |
author_facet |
de Paula Ramos, Vitor de Paula Ramos, Vitor |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Paula Ramos, Vitor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Prova testemunhal Psicologia do Testemunho. Raciocínio Probatório Eyewitness testimony Evidential reasoning Psychology of Testimony. |
topic |
Prova testemunhal Psicologia do Testemunho. Raciocínio Probatório Eyewitness testimony Evidential reasoning Psychology of Testimony. |
description |
The present study explores retention interval and post-event information as two potential factors of impact in eyewitness testimony; those factors have been proven scientifically long time ago, but continue to be in the shadows of criminal procedure jurisprudence. The article aims to answer two questions: (i) considering all the scientific evidence available, why do factors as retention interval and post-event information continue to be ignored by the law, and, specifically by the criminal procedure jurisprudence?; (ii) how is it possible to rearrange criminal procedures in order to consider and deal with memory retention interval and post-event information? To do so, in the first part it presents two reasons that contribute to keep those problems in the shadows (presuntivism and false dichotomy between truth and lie); in the second part, it presents the problems; and in the third part it presents three proposals to try to deal with them (immediate production, when possible, and the existence of protocols about the ways of questioning and about the need that interviews are recorded. The methodology used is the analysis of bibliography on psychology and epistemology of testimony, as well as criminal procedure jurisprudence. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/740/463 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor de Paula Ramos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor de Paula Ramos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022) Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2022) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 3 (2022) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 3 (2022) 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1822180670563155968 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.740 |