Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Rocha Sampaio, André
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/873
Resumo: This article aims to address the meta-legal relations between the management of the speed of the criminal process and the social constraints arising from neoliberal reason. To this end, it is based on the premise established by Foucault and deepened by Dardot and Laval that neoliberalism has become socially rooted to the point of transmuting from a simple economic model to a rationality that spreads to the most diverse social fields. The work is guided by the question: are there harmful effects beyond the loss of quality in the motivation of decisions with the adoption of efficiency logic by the criminal judge? The objective is to verify whether the management principles of this reason may be harmful to the proper functioning of the criminal process. This is an exploratory, interdisciplinary research, based exclusively on bibliographical references. The conclusion is that there are no conditions for intensifying the pace of the criminal process without a loss of quality that is not only technical, but also democratic, since acceleration without other measures ends up catalyzing authoritarian clots that have never been completely expunged from the Brazilian system of criminal procedure.
id IBRASPP-1_d31c8b7636f9d9aad2874d09cec00de2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/873
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and NeoliberalismIntersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismoeficientismorazão neoliberalautoritarismoCNJdecisão judicialefficiencyismneoliberal reasonauthoritarianismCNJjudicial decisionThis article aims to address the meta-legal relations between the management of the speed of the criminal process and the social constraints arising from neoliberal reason. To this end, it is based on the premise established by Foucault and deepened by Dardot and Laval that neoliberalism has become socially rooted to the point of transmuting from a simple economic model to a rationality that spreads to the most diverse social fields. The work is guided by the question: are there harmful effects beyond the loss of quality in the motivation of decisions with the adoption of efficiency logic by the criminal judge? The objective is to verify whether the management principles of this reason may be harmful to the proper functioning of the criminal process. This is an exploratory, interdisciplinary research, based exclusively on bibliographical references. The conclusion is that there are no conditions for intensifying the pace of the criminal process without a loss of quality that is not only technical, but also democratic, since acceleration without other measures ends up catalyzing authoritarian clots that have never been completely expunged from the Brazilian system of criminal procedure.Trata-se de artigo que visa abordar as relações metajurídicas entre a gestão da velocidade do processo penal e os constrangimentos sociais oriundos da razão neoliberal. Para tal, partiu-se da premissa instituída por Foucault e aprofundada por Dardot e Laval de que o neoliberalismo se arraigou socialmente ao ponto de se transmutar de um simples modelo econômico a uma racionalidade que se espalha para os mais diversos campos sociais. O trabalho é guiado pela pergunta: há efeitos deletérios para além da perda da qualidade da motivação das decisões com a adoção da lógica eficientista pelo juiz penal? O objetivo é verificar se os princípios de gestão dessa razão podem ser perniciosos ao bom funcionamento do processo penal. É pesquisa de cunho exploratório, de cariz interdisciplinar, calcada em referencial bibliográfico, exclusivamente. Ao cabo, conclui-se que não há condições de se intensificar o ritmo do processo penal sem haver uma perda de qualidade não só técnica, mas também democrática, visto que o aceleramento desprovido de outras medidas acaba por catalisar coágulos autoritários nunca completamente expurgados do sistema processual penal brasileiro.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/87310.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/873/517Copyright (c) 2024 Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo, André Rocha Sampaiohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira Rocha Sampaio, André2024-03-27T10:37:18Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/873Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2024-03-27T10:37:18Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo
title Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
spellingShingle Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira
eficientismo
razão neoliberal
autoritarismo
CNJ
decisão judicial
efficiencyism
neoliberal reason
authoritarianism
CNJ
judicial decision
title_short Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
title_full Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
title_fullStr Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
title_full_unstemmed Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
title_sort Intersections between Criminal Procedural Efficiency and Neoliberalism
author Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira
author_facet Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira
Rocha Sampaio, André
author_role author
author2 Rocha Sampaio, André
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira
Rocha Sampaio, André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv eficientismo
razão neoliberal
autoritarismo
CNJ
decisão judicial
efficiencyism
neoliberal reason
authoritarianism
CNJ
judicial decision
topic eficientismo
razão neoliberal
autoritarismo
CNJ
decisão judicial
efficiencyism
neoliberal reason
authoritarianism
CNJ
judicial decision
description This article aims to address the meta-legal relations between the management of the speed of the criminal process and the social constraints arising from neoliberal reason. To this end, it is based on the premise established by Foucault and deepened by Dardot and Laval that neoliberalism has become socially rooted to the point of transmuting from a simple economic model to a rationality that spreads to the most diverse social fields. The work is guided by the question: are there harmful effects beyond the loss of quality in the motivation of decisions with the adoption of efficiency logic by the criminal judge? The objective is to verify whether the management principles of this reason may be harmful to the proper functioning of the criminal process. This is an exploratory, interdisciplinary research, based exclusively on bibliographical references. The conclusion is that there are no conditions for intensifying the pace of the criminal process without a loss of quality that is not only technical, but also democratic, since acceleration without other measures ends up catalyzing authoritarian clots that have never been completely expunged from the Brazilian system of criminal procedure.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/873
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/873
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/873/517
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo, André Rocha Sampaio
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo, André Rocha Sampaio
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941781872640