Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ponte Carvalho, Gabriela
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Piza Duarte, Evandro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/109
Resumo: This study analyzes the doctrine about the rights of the accused in the United States of America, through an examination of the Miranda v. Arizona case. It explores how the privilege against self-incrimination is applied in the phase of police investigation. Thus, it is intended to demonstrate the differences between the American and the Brazilian laws, highlighting, in the latter, the formality in the implementation of such rights. Such a formality indicates the responsibility for allowing institutional violence that lies in the decisions of the Brazilian Supreme Court, which, unlike the American Court, does not cope with the practical and constitutional aspects of the custody of suspects and the confessions obtained during a police investigation.
id IBRASPP-1_d835238ef29cf442a689b659be2ea291
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/109
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigationAs Abordagens Policiais e o Caso Miranda v. Arizona (1966): violência institucional e o papel das cortes constitucionais na garantia da assistência do defensor na fase policialFundamental rightsright to remain silentrights of the accusedcriminal procedureMiranda v. Arizonasuspect.Direitos FundamentaisDireito ao SilêncioDireitos do AcusadoProcesso PenalMiranda v. ArizonaSuspeito.This study analyzes the doctrine about the rights of the accused in the United States of America, through an examination of the Miranda v. Arizona case. It explores how the privilege against self-incrimination is applied in the phase of police investigation. Thus, it is intended to demonstrate the differences between the American and the Brazilian laws, highlighting, in the latter, the formality in the implementation of such rights. Such a formality indicates the responsibility for allowing institutional violence that lies in the decisions of the Brazilian Supreme Court, which, unlike the American Court, does not cope with the practical and constitutional aspects of the custody of suspects and the confessions obtained during a police investigation.O texto analisa a doutrina construída a respeito dos direitos do acusado nos Estados Unidos, a partir da decisão da Suprema Corte no caso Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Descreve-se o modo como o direito de não produzir prova contra si (nemo tenetur se detegere) se manifesta na fase de policiamento, identificação de suspeitos e investigação policial. Pretende-se, com isso, demonstrar as diferenças entre o direito estadunidense e o direito brasileiro, realçando, neste caso, o caráter essencialmente formal das interpretações que visam a garantir direitos aos suspeitos. Desse modo, intenta-se demonstrar a responsabilidade pela violência institucional presente em decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal, que, ao contrário da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos, não se defronta com as dimensões práticas e constitucionais da custódia de suspeitos e das confissões feitas na fase policial. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/10910.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.109Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 303-334Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 303-334Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 303-334Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 303-3342525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/109/104Copyright (c) 2018 Gabriela Ponte Carvalho, Evandro Piza Duarteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPonte Carvalho, GabrielaPiza Duarte, Evandro2018-03-07T14:29:55Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/109Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-03-07T14:29:55Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
As Abordagens Policiais e o Caso Miranda v. Arizona (1966): violência institucional e o papel das cortes constitucionais na garantia da assistência do defensor na fase policial
title Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
spellingShingle Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
Ponte Carvalho, Gabriela
Fundamental rights
right to remain silent
rights of the accused
criminal procedure
Miranda v. Arizona
suspect.
Direitos Fundamentais
Direito ao Silêncio
Direitos do Acusado
Processo Penal
Miranda v. Arizona
Suspeito.
title_short Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
title_full Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
title_fullStr Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
title_full_unstemmed Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
title_sort Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and the role of Constitutional Courts in assuring right to counsel during police investigation
author Ponte Carvalho, Gabriela
author_facet Ponte Carvalho, Gabriela
Piza Duarte, Evandro
author_role author
author2 Piza Duarte, Evandro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ponte Carvalho, Gabriela
Piza Duarte, Evandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fundamental rights
right to remain silent
rights of the accused
criminal procedure
Miranda v. Arizona
suspect.
Direitos Fundamentais
Direito ao Silêncio
Direitos do Acusado
Processo Penal
Miranda v. Arizona
Suspeito.
topic Fundamental rights
right to remain silent
rights of the accused
criminal procedure
Miranda v. Arizona
suspect.
Direitos Fundamentais
Direito ao Silêncio
Direitos do Acusado
Processo Penal
Miranda v. Arizona
Suspeito.
description This study analyzes the doctrine about the rights of the accused in the United States of America, through an examination of the Miranda v. Arizona case. It explores how the privilege against self-incrimination is applied in the phase of police investigation. Thus, it is intended to demonstrate the differences between the American and the Brazilian laws, highlighting, in the latter, the formality in the implementation of such rights. Such a formality indicates the responsibility for allowing institutional violence that lies in the decisions of the Brazilian Supreme Court, which, unlike the American Court, does not cope with the practical and constitutional aspects of the custody of suspects and the confessions obtained during a police investigation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/109
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.109
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/109
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.109
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/109/104
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Gabriela Ponte Carvalho, Evandro Piza Duarte
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Gabriela Ponte Carvalho, Evandro Piza Duarte
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 303-334
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 303-334
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 303-334
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 303-334
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939942670336

Registros relacionados