The evidence admission criteria

• Autor(a) principal: Ubertis, Giulio
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: ita
• Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/517
• topic: Artificial intelligence; Evidence admission; Judicial truth; Pertinence; Relevance; Scientific evidence; Verisimilitude.; Ammissione probatoria; Intelligenza artificiale; Pertinenza; Prova scientifica; Rilevanza; Verità giudiziale; Verosimiglianza.

Judicial truth, a prerequisite for a just decision, cannot be pursued without limits. Evidentiary norms aim to protect chiefly fundamental rights and the criteria of procedural rationality, respecting the reasonable time duration of the trial. The assessment of evidence submission is successful when the evidentiary theme is possible and pertinent, and where the means and / or sources of evidence are relevant in the threefold sense of their necessity (i.e. of their non-redundancy), of their content fitness (in that they can serve to verify the statement to be proved) and of their epistemological fitness (as the activity performed complies with the historically given gnoseological parameters). Finally, it is clarified that the use of artificial intelligence must likewise guarantee meaningful human control.