Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pezo Jimenez, Omar
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Bellodas Ticona, Carlos Augusto, Alca Gómez, Américo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/891
Resumo: The objective was to analyze the implications associated with the enactment of Law No. 31592, which introduces significant amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the acquitted person's conviction. For these purposes, it was analyzed whether such legislation complies with national and international standards regarding judicial conformity, as well as to examine its feasibility and effectiveness in terms of judicial proceedings aimed at challenging acquittal convictions. A mixed methodological approach was adopted over an extended period, covering the analysis of judicial decisions issued between the period 2010 - 2022. Through a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the principle of double jeopardy should be applied exclusively to the convicted person, highlighting that challenges related to acquittal convictions should be the competence of a Criminal or Mixed Chamber belonging to a specific Judicial District, instead of being attributed to the Supreme Court. Consequently, the modification introduced by this Law is highly detrimental by virtue of the possible difficulties it could cause in the operability of the appeal processes, as well as its potential to weaken the principle of double conformity, which constitutes a fundamental pillar in the judicial system.
id IBRASPP-1_e8cf6223209048b3fd7b720c573ffd5b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/891
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted Desnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absueltoDesnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absueltoCarga procesalcondena del absueltodesnaturalizacióndoble conformeoperatividad judicialProcedural burdenconviction of acquitteddenaturalizationdouble jeopardyjudicial operability.The objective was to analyze the implications associated with the enactment of Law No. 31592, which introduces significant amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the acquitted person's conviction. For these purposes, it was analyzed whether such legislation complies with national and international standards regarding judicial conformity, as well as to examine its feasibility and effectiveness in terms of judicial proceedings aimed at challenging acquittal convictions. A mixed methodological approach was adopted over an extended period, covering the analysis of judicial decisions issued between the period 2010 - 2022. Through a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the principle of double jeopardy should be applied exclusively to the convicted person, highlighting that challenges related to acquittal convictions should be the competence of a Criminal or Mixed Chamber belonging to a specific Judicial District, instead of being attributed to the Supreme Court. Consequently, the modification introduced by this Law is highly detrimental by virtue of the possible difficulties it could cause in the operability of the appeal processes, as well as its potential to weaken the principle of double conformity, which constitutes a fundamental pillar in the judicial system. El objetivo fue analizar las implicancias asociadas a la promulgación de la Ley N° 31592, promulgada el 26 de octubre de 2022, que introduce modificaciones significativas en el Código Procesal Penal respecto a la condena del absuelto. Para estos efectos, se analizó si dicha norma se ajustaba a los estándares nacionales e internacionales en lo referente a la conformidad judicial, así como examinar su viabilidad y efectividad de las impugnaciones de las condenas de absueltos. Se adoptó un enfoque metodológico mixto durante un período prolongado, abarcando el análisis de resoluciones judiciales emitidas entre el periodo 2010 - 2022. Mediante un minucioso análisis, se arribó a la conclusión de que el principio del doble conforme debe aplicarse exclusivamente al condenado, resaltando que las impugnaciones relacionadas con las condenas de absolución deben ser competencia de una Sala Penal o Mixta perteneciente a un Distrito Judicial, en lugar de ser atribución de la Corte Suprema. En consecuencia, la modificación introducida por esta Ley es altamente perjudicial en virtud de las posibles dificultades que podría ocasionar en la operatividad de los procesos de apelación, así como su potencial para debilitar el principio del doble conforme, que constituye un pilar fundamental en el sistema judicial. El objetivo fue analizar las implicancias asociadas a la promulgación de la Ley N° 31592, promulgada el 26 de octubre de 2022, que introduce modificaciones significativas en el Código Procesal Penal respecto a la condena del absuelto. Para estos efectos, se analizó si dicha norma se ajustaba a los estándares nacionales e internacionales en lo referente a la conformidad judicial, así como examinar su viabilidad y efectividad de las impugnaciones de las condenas de absueltos. Se adoptó un enfoque metodológico mixto durante un período prolongado, abarcando el análisis de resoluciones judiciales emitidas entre el periodo 2010 - 2022. Mediante un minucioso análisis, se arribó a la conclusión de que el principio del doble conforme debe aplicarse exclusivamente al condenado, resaltando que las impugnaciones relacionadas con las condenas de absolución deben ser competencia de una Sala Penal o Mixta perteneciente a un Distrito Judicial, en lugar de ser atribución de la Corte Suprema. En consecuencia, la modificación introducida por esta Ley es altamente perjudicial en virtud de las posibles dificultades que podría ocasionar en la operatividad de los procesos de apelación, así como su potencial para debilitar el principio del doble conforme, que constituye un pilar fundamental en el sistema judicial. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/89110.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.891Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/891/516Copyright (c) 2024 Omar Pezo Jimenez, Carlos Augusto Bellodas Ticona, Américo Alca Gómezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPezo Jimenez, OmarBellodas Ticona, Carlos Augusto Alca Gómez, Américo Pezo Jimenez, Omar2024-03-27T10:37:17Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/891Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2024-03-27T10:37:17Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
Desnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absuelto
Desnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absuelto
title Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
spellingShingle Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
Pezo Jimenez, Omar
Carga procesal
condena del absuelto
desnaturalización
doble conforme
operatividad judicial
Procedural burden
conviction of acquitted
denaturalization
double jeopardy
judicial operability.
title_short Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
title_full Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
title_fullStr Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
title_full_unstemmed Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
title_sort Denaturalization of double jeopardy and overloading of the procedural burden in the law of conviction of the acquitted
author Pezo Jimenez, Omar
author_facet Pezo Jimenez, Omar
Bellodas Ticona, Carlos Augusto
Alca Gómez, Américo
author_role author
author2 Bellodas Ticona, Carlos Augusto
Alca Gómez, Américo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pezo Jimenez, Omar
Bellodas Ticona, Carlos Augusto
Alca Gómez, Américo
Pezo Jimenez, Omar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carga procesal
condena del absuelto
desnaturalización
doble conforme
operatividad judicial
Procedural burden
conviction of acquitted
denaturalization
double jeopardy
judicial operability.
topic Carga procesal
condena del absuelto
desnaturalización
doble conforme
operatividad judicial
Procedural burden
conviction of acquitted
denaturalization
double jeopardy
judicial operability.
description The objective was to analyze the implications associated with the enactment of Law No. 31592, which introduces significant amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the acquitted person's conviction. For these purposes, it was analyzed whether such legislation complies with national and international standards regarding judicial conformity, as well as to examine its feasibility and effectiveness in terms of judicial proceedings aimed at challenging acquittal convictions. A mixed methodological approach was adopted over an extended period, covering the analysis of judicial decisions issued between the period 2010 - 2022. Through a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the principle of double jeopardy should be applied exclusively to the convicted person, highlighting that challenges related to acquittal convictions should be the competence of a Criminal or Mixed Chamber belonging to a specific Judicial District, instead of being attributed to the Supreme Court. Consequently, the modification introduced by this Law is highly detrimental by virtue of the possible difficulties it could cause in the operability of the appeal processes, as well as its potential to weaken the principle of double conformity, which constitutes a fundamental pillar in the judicial system.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/891
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.891
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/891
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.891
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/891/516
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Omar Pezo Jimenez, Carlos Augusto Bellodas Ticona, Américo Alca Gómez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Omar Pezo Jimenez, Carlos Augusto Bellodas Ticona, Américo Alca Gómez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941791309824

Registros relacionados