Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ayala Yancce, Rafael
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246
Resumo: Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment.
id IBRASPP-1_f911ed195d10a8099c86cb8d862a6f01
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/246
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedingsCredibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penalMemorycredibilitytestimonyeyewitnessreferential witness.Memoriacredibilidadtestimoniotestigo presencialtestigo referencial.Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment.Hoy en día la gran mayoría de los jueces para valorar la credibilidad testimonial dentro del proceso penal como primer punto analizan las características personales y los cambios fisiológicos del testigo, dejando a un lado la funcionalidad de la memoria humana. La psicología del testimonio nos precisa que para valorar la credibilidad no tiene por qué examinar las características del testigo, sino que debe analizarse la correspondencia entre lo sucedido y lo que manifiesta el testigo de lo que ha percibido, ya que esto permite diferenciar entre las experiencias vividas de aquellas historias imaginadas o inventadas. El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar la exactitud de la memoria a la hora de reproducir la información. Una vez analizada la exactitud de la memoria y las fallas en la recuperación de la información me centraré en presentar los pasos o criterios de valoración de la credibilidad testimonial de los testigos presenciales y referenciales que debe tener en cuenta el juez a la hora de motivar la sentencia.   Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/24610.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.246Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 453-480Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 453-480Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 453-480Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 453-4802525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/213https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/291Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael ayala yancce Rafaelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAyala Yancce, Rafael2020-10-27T10:32:20Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/246Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-10-27T10:32:20Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal
title Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
spellingShingle Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
Ayala Yancce, Rafael
Memory
credibility
testimony
eyewitness
referential witness.
Memoria
credibilidad
testimonio
testigo presencial
testigo referencial.
title_short Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
title_full Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
title_fullStr Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
title_full_unstemmed Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
title_sort Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
author Ayala Yancce, Rafael
author_facet Ayala Yancce, Rafael
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ayala Yancce, Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Memory
credibility
testimony
eyewitness
referential witness.
Memoria
credibilidad
testimonio
testigo presencial
testigo referencial.
topic Memory
credibility
testimony
eyewitness
referential witness.
Memoria
credibilidad
testimonio
testigo presencial
testigo referencial.
description Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.246
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.246
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/213
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/291
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael ayala yancce Rafael
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael ayala yancce Rafael
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 453-480
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 453-480
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 453-480
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 453-480
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281940434452480