Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246 |
Resumo: | Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_f911ed195d10a8099c86cb8d862a6f01 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/246 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedingsCredibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penalMemorycredibilitytestimonyeyewitnessreferential witness.Memoriacredibilidadtestimoniotestigo presencialtestigo referencial.Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment.Hoy en día la gran mayoría de los jueces para valorar la credibilidad testimonial dentro del proceso penal como primer punto analizan las características personales y los cambios fisiológicos del testigo, dejando a un lado la funcionalidad de la memoria humana. La psicología del testimonio nos precisa que para valorar la credibilidad no tiene por qué examinar las características del testigo, sino que debe analizarse la correspondencia entre lo sucedido y lo que manifiesta el testigo de lo que ha percibido, ya que esto permite diferenciar entre las experiencias vividas de aquellas historias imaginadas o inventadas. El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar la exactitud de la memoria a la hora de reproducir la información. Una vez analizada la exactitud de la memoria y las fallas en la recuperación de la información me centraré en presentar los pasos o criterios de valoración de la credibilidad testimonial de los testigos presenciales y referenciales que debe tener en cuenta el juez a la hora de motivar la sentencia. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/24610.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.246Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 453-480Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 453-480Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 453-480Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 453-4802525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/213https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/291Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael ayala yancce Rafaelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAyala Yancce, Rafael2020-10-27T10:32:20Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/246Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-10-27T10:32:20Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal |
title |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings |
spellingShingle |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings Ayala Yancce, Rafael Memory credibility testimony eyewitness referential witness. Memoria credibilidad testimonio testigo presencial testigo referencial. |
title_short |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings |
title_full |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings |
title_fullStr |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings |
title_sort |
Witness testimonial credibility in criminal proceedings |
author |
Ayala Yancce, Rafael |
author_facet |
Ayala Yancce, Rafael |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ayala Yancce, Rafael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Memory credibility testimony eyewitness referential witness. Memoria credibilidad testimonio testigo presencial testigo referencial. |
topic |
Memory credibility testimony eyewitness referential witness. Memoria credibilidad testimonio testigo presencial testigo referencial. |
description |
Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.246 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.246 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/213 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/246/291 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael ayala yancce Rafael info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael ayala yancce Rafael |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 453-480 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 453-480 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 453-480 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 453-480 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281940434452480 |