Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100206 |
Resumo: | Abstract This research consolidates debates around the impact of international norm contestation and evaluates previous findings. It conceptualises a typology for norms and norm contestation and applies this framework to R2P to test its explanatory effectiveness. The typologies draw on work by Finnemore and Sikkink, as well as the applicatory versus justificatory discourse by Deitelhoff and Zimmermann and Wiener’s modes of contestation, amongst others. It also proposes additional factors such as the location of contestation as well as the commonalities of norm challengers. The recent conceptualisation around norm robustness is found to be only useful in evaluating the strength of norms. |
id |
IBRI-1_2a34bcb72a39beee9f0b1a7d17132fa9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-73292021000100206 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to ProtectNorm contestationapplicatory discoursejustificatory discoursemode of contestationnorm robustnessresponsibility to protectAbstract This research consolidates debates around the impact of international norm contestation and evaluates previous findings. It conceptualises a typology for norms and norm contestation and applies this framework to R2P to test its explanatory effectiveness. The typologies draw on work by Finnemore and Sikkink, as well as the applicatory versus justificatory discourse by Deitelhoff and Zimmermann and Wiener’s modes of contestation, amongst others. It also proposes additional factors such as the location of contestation as well as the commonalities of norm challengers. The recent conceptualisation around norm robustness is found to be only useful in evaluating the strength of norms.Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100206Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.64 n.1 2021reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)instacron:IBRI10.1590/0034-7329202100106info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZähringer,Natalieeng2021-07-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-73292021000100206Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbpihttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org1983-31210034-7329opendoar:2021-07-08T00:00Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
title |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
spellingShingle |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect Zähringer,Natalie Norm contestation applicatory discourse justificatory discourse mode of contestation norm robustness responsibility to protect |
title_short |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
title_full |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
title_fullStr |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
title_sort |
Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: a conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the Responsibility to Protect |
author |
Zähringer,Natalie |
author_facet |
Zähringer,Natalie |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zähringer,Natalie |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Norm contestation applicatory discourse justificatory discourse mode of contestation norm robustness responsibility to protect |
topic |
Norm contestation applicatory discourse justificatory discourse mode of contestation norm robustness responsibility to protect |
description |
Abstract This research consolidates debates around the impact of international norm contestation and evaluates previous findings. It conceptualises a typology for norms and norm contestation and applies this framework to R2P to test its explanatory effectiveness. The typologies draw on work by Finnemore and Sikkink, as well as the applicatory versus justificatory discourse by Deitelhoff and Zimmermann and Wiener’s modes of contestation, amongst others. It also proposes additional factors such as the location of contestation as well as the commonalities of norm challengers. The recent conceptualisation around norm robustness is found to be only useful in evaluating the strength of norms. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100206 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100206 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7329202100106 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.64 n.1 2021 reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) instacron:IBRI |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
instacron_str |
IBRI |
institution |
IBRI |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org |
_version_ |
1754193627623456768 |