The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cierco,Teresa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Silva,Jorge Tavares da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100203
Resumo: Abstract In this article we analyze two different perceptions of border inside Europe. On the one hand, we have the perception idealized by the European Union as an international organization, which believes that states benefit more from cooperation and dilution of borders in a common space than from keeping its borders as a symbol of its sovereignty. On the other hand, we have the European member states, taken individually, with particular interests and goals that, given the threat of illegal immigration, which is currently felt in the large-scale Europe, adopt a realistic perception of the border, and look at each territory as a space that needs protection from external threats. Following this argument, we reason that the current construction of walls in several European countries reflects the rebirth of a realistic perception of the border, and this is one more challenge for Europe regarding its unity and solidarity. Is this the end of the Schengen Agreement? What is going to happen to the European project if each state unilaterally adopts a strategy to deal with illegal immigration and refugees that are coming to Europe? Can immigration lead to a retrocession of the EU idealist significance of border?
id IBRI-1_7a71ceab0c0d641a4910e8f9bcbaa24f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-73292016000100203
network_acronym_str IBRI-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of borderEuropean UnionEuropean bordersSchengen AgreementFrontexAbstract In this article we analyze two different perceptions of border inside Europe. On the one hand, we have the perception idealized by the European Union as an international organization, which believes that states benefit more from cooperation and dilution of borders in a common space than from keeping its borders as a symbol of its sovereignty. On the other hand, we have the European member states, taken individually, with particular interests and goals that, given the threat of illegal immigration, which is currently felt in the large-scale Europe, adopt a realistic perception of the border, and look at each territory as a space that needs protection from external threats. Following this argument, we reason that the current construction of walls in several European countries reflects the rebirth of a realistic perception of the border, and this is one more challenge for Europe regarding its unity and solidarity. Is this the end of the Schengen Agreement? What is going to happen to the European project if each state unilaterally adopts a strategy to deal with illegal immigration and refugees that are coming to Europe? Can immigration lead to a retrocession of the EU idealist significance of border?Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100203Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.59 n.1 2016reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)instacron:IBRI10.1590/0034-7329201600103info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCierco,TeresaSilva,Jorge Tavares daeng2020-04-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-73292016000100203Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbpihttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org1983-31210034-7329opendoar:2020-04-24T00:00Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
title The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
spellingShingle The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
Cierco,Teresa
European Union
European borders
Schengen Agreement
Frontex
title_short The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
title_full The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
title_fullStr The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
title_full_unstemmed The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
title_sort The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border
author Cierco,Teresa
author_facet Cierco,Teresa
Silva,Jorge Tavares da
author_role author
author2 Silva,Jorge Tavares da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cierco,Teresa
Silva,Jorge Tavares da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv European Union
European borders
Schengen Agreement
Frontex
topic European Union
European borders
Schengen Agreement
Frontex
description Abstract In this article we analyze two different perceptions of border inside Europe. On the one hand, we have the perception idealized by the European Union as an international organization, which believes that states benefit more from cooperation and dilution of borders in a common space than from keeping its borders as a symbol of its sovereignty. On the other hand, we have the European member states, taken individually, with particular interests and goals that, given the threat of illegal immigration, which is currently felt in the large-scale Europe, adopt a realistic perception of the border, and look at each territory as a space that needs protection from external threats. Following this argument, we reason that the current construction of walls in several European countries reflects the rebirth of a realistic perception of the border, and this is one more challenge for Europe regarding its unity and solidarity. Is this the end of the Schengen Agreement? What is going to happen to the European project if each state unilaterally adopts a strategy to deal with illegal immigration and refugees that are coming to Europe? Can immigration lead to a retrocession of the EU idealist significance of border?
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100203
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7329201600103
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.59 n.1 2016
reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)
instacron:IBRI
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)
instacron_str IBRI
institution IBRI
reponame_str Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org
_version_ 1754193627152646144