The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma”
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100204 |
Resumo: | Abstract This article makes a comparison between the challenges faced by the US to maintain its hegemonic position at the end of the 1970s and in the 2010s. To do so we review Robert Gilpin’s writing during the first period. He suggested the US had three options: 1) a defensive protectionist reaction 2) fragmentation of the international system 3) a new wave of innovation, (“rejuvenation”). It is argued that the Reagan administration was able to establish support for the third option. We argue the US is now faced with the same dilemma again, but with a different kind of challenger: China. |
id |
IBRI-1_f55dd9b2c79489496caea54221b07cdf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-73292021000100204 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma”China’s riseForeign Direct InvestmentRobert GilpinUS HegemonyAbstract This article makes a comparison between the challenges faced by the US to maintain its hegemonic position at the end of the 1970s and in the 2010s. To do so we review Robert Gilpin’s writing during the first period. He suggested the US had three options: 1) a defensive protectionist reaction 2) fragmentation of the international system 3) a new wave of innovation, (“rejuvenation”). It is argued that the Reagan administration was able to establish support for the third option. We argue the US is now faced with the same dilemma again, but with a different kind of challenger: China.Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100204Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.64 n.1 2021reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)instacron:IBRI10.1590/0034-7329202100104info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchutte,Giorgio Romanoeng2021-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-73292021000100204Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbpihttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org1983-31210034-7329opendoar:2021-05-26T00:00Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
title |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
spellingShingle |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” Schutte,Giorgio Romano China’s rise Foreign Direct Investment Robert Gilpin US Hegemony |
title_short |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
title_full |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
title_fullStr |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
title_full_unstemmed |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
title_sort |
The challenge to US hegemony and the “Gilpin Dilemma” |
author |
Schutte,Giorgio Romano |
author_facet |
Schutte,Giorgio Romano |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schutte,Giorgio Romano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
China’s rise Foreign Direct Investment Robert Gilpin US Hegemony |
topic |
China’s rise Foreign Direct Investment Robert Gilpin US Hegemony |
description |
Abstract This article makes a comparison between the challenges faced by the US to maintain its hegemonic position at the end of the 1970s and in the 2010s. To do so we review Robert Gilpin’s writing during the first period. He suggested the US had three options: 1) a defensive protectionist reaction 2) fragmentation of the international system 3) a new wave of innovation, (“rejuvenation”). It is argued that the Reagan administration was able to establish support for the third option. We argue the US is now faced with the same dilemma again, but with a different kind of challenger: China. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100204 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292021000100204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7329202100104 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.64 n.1 2021 reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) instacron:IBRI |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
instacron_str |
IBRI |
institution |
IBRI |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org |
_version_ |
1754193627621359616 |