Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Selaya, Galia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biodiversidade Brasileira
Texto Completo: https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1335
Resumo: This study aims to know how people plan land use taking into account uncertainty due to fire in the Chiquitano dry and Amazonian moist forests of Bolivia. In these regions, local people’s livelihood depends greatly on forest, but fire and concomitant effects of climate change and migration are threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services. Burning forest patches is the common way to prepare land for cropping, but usually it goes beyond control creating extensive forest fires. There is a need to create a common environmental agenda among locals and newcomers to save remnant forest and biodiversity. We used a participatory approach as a reflexive tool to answer the following questions: What are land use expectations across different groups “local” vs “newcomers” and gender “women vs men”? What are the key issues that prevents or encourage a shared conservation agenda? We applied a game approach to simulate landscape (dry and moist forest) where people decide activities, number of ha, type of management, and risk to forest cover because of using fire to clear land. Game board is a grid resembling a landscape that players use for their livelihood. In the game group of men and women play roles of a family deciding how to clear land. A dice is thrown to simulate risk of fire spread. Players win points base on forest cover retention. They lose point based on chances of fire spread. Results showed game is a useful tool to set common grounds for landscape planning. It showed how individual choices can affect overall community, especially with respect to fire spread. The agribusiness and conservation visions coexisted across groups, but agribusiness as a panacea was more evident in newcomers. Women leaned to a diverse portfolio rather than agribusiness only, though there were exceptions. The game helped to understand contradictory land tenure and land use rules that had relation with fires. Simulation of fire percolation across landscape served to discuss norms and actions to prevent fire. Overall, the game shows loopholes in forest protection in Bolivia that needs to incorporate people’s voices in land use planning policy.
id ICMBIO-1_27440694fcec8c5183a910b7a8ca1e05
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1335
network_acronym_str ICMBIO-1
network_name_str Biodiversidade Brasileira
repository_id_str
spelling Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk PreventionGaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk PreventionThis study aims to know how people plan land use taking into account uncertainty due to fire in the Chiquitano dry and Amazonian moist forests of Bolivia. In these regions, local people’s livelihood depends greatly on forest, but fire and concomitant effects of climate change and migration are threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services. Burning forest patches is the common way to prepare land for cropping, but usually it goes beyond control creating extensive forest fires. There is a need to create a common environmental agenda among locals and newcomers to save remnant forest and biodiversity. We used a participatory approach as a reflexive tool to answer the following questions: What are land use expectations across different groups “local” vs “newcomers” and gender “women vs men”? What are the key issues that prevents or encourage a shared conservation agenda? We applied a game approach to simulate landscape (dry and moist forest) where people decide activities, number of ha, type of management, and risk to forest cover because of using fire to clear land. Game board is a grid resembling a landscape that players use for their livelihood. In the game group of men and women play roles of a family deciding how to clear land. A dice is thrown to simulate risk of fire spread. Players win points base on forest cover retention. They lose point based on chances of fire spread. Results showed game is a useful tool to set common grounds for landscape planning. It showed how individual choices can affect overall community, especially with respect to fire spread. The agribusiness and conservation visions coexisted across groups, but agribusiness as a panacea was more evident in newcomers. Women leaned to a diverse portfolio rather than agribusiness only, though there were exceptions. The game helped to understand contradictory land tenure and land use rules that had relation with fires. Simulation of fire percolation across landscape served to discuss norms and actions to prevent fire. Overall, the game shows loopholes in forest protection in Bolivia that needs to incorporate people’s voices in land use planning policy.This study aims to know how people plan land use taking into account uncertainty due to fire in the Chiquitano dry and Amazonian moist forests of Bolivia. In these regions, local people’s livelihood depends greatly on forest, but fire and concomitant effects of climate change and migration are threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services. Burning forest patches is the common way to prepare land for cropping, but usually it goes beyond control creating extensive forest fires. There is a need to create a common environmental agenda among locals and newcomers to save remnant forest and biodiversity. We used a participatory approach as a reflexive tool to answer the following questions: What are land use expectations across different groups “local” vs “newcomers” and gender “women vs men”? What are the key issues that prevents or encourage a shared conservation agenda? We applied a game approach to simulate landscape (dry and moist forest) where people decide activities, number of ha, type of management, and risk to forest cover because of using fire to clear land. Game board is a grid resembling a landscape that players use for their livelihood. In the game group of men and women play roles of a family deciding how to clear land. A dice is thrown to simulate risk of fire spread. Players win points base on forest cover retention. They lose point based on chances of fire spread. Results showed game is a useful tool to set common grounds for landscape planning. It showed how individual choices can affect overall community, especially with respect to fire spread. The agribusiness and conservation visions coexisted across groups, but agribusiness as a panacea was more evident in newcomers. Women leaned to a diverse portfolio rather than agribusiness only, though there were exceptions. The game helped to understand contradictory land tenure and land use rules that had relation with fires. Simulation of fire percolation across landscape served to discuss norms and actions to prevent fire. Overall, the game shows loopholes in forest protection in Bolivia that needs to incorporate people’s voices in land use planning policy.Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)2019-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/133510.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1335Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 56Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 56Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 562236-288610.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileirainstname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)instacron:ICMBIOenghttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1335/702Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasilhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSelaya, Galia2023-05-09T12:56:02Zoai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1335Revistahttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBRPUBhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/oaifernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br2236-28862236-2886opendoar:2023-05-09T12:56:02Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
title Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
spellingShingle Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
Selaya, Galia
title_short Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
title_full Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
title_fullStr Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
title_full_unstemmed Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
title_sort Gaming for Landscape Planning: A Participatory Tool for a Shared Conservation Agenda and Fire Risk Prevention
author Selaya, Galia
author_facet Selaya, Galia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Selaya, Galia
description This study aims to know how people plan land use taking into account uncertainty due to fire in the Chiquitano dry and Amazonian moist forests of Bolivia. In these regions, local people’s livelihood depends greatly on forest, but fire and concomitant effects of climate change and migration are threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services. Burning forest patches is the common way to prepare land for cropping, but usually it goes beyond control creating extensive forest fires. There is a need to create a common environmental agenda among locals and newcomers to save remnant forest and biodiversity. We used a participatory approach as a reflexive tool to answer the following questions: What are land use expectations across different groups “local” vs “newcomers” and gender “women vs men”? What are the key issues that prevents or encourage a shared conservation agenda? We applied a game approach to simulate landscape (dry and moist forest) where people decide activities, number of ha, type of management, and risk to forest cover because of using fire to clear land. Game board is a grid resembling a landscape that players use for their livelihood. In the game group of men and women play roles of a family deciding how to clear land. A dice is thrown to simulate risk of fire spread. Players win points base on forest cover retention. They lose point based on chances of fire spread. Results showed game is a useful tool to set common grounds for landscape planning. It showed how individual choices can affect overall community, especially with respect to fire spread. The agribusiness and conservation visions coexisted across groups, but agribusiness as a panacea was more evident in newcomers. Women leaned to a diverse portfolio rather than agribusiness only, though there were exceptions. The game helped to understand contradictory land tenure and land use rules that had relation with fires. Simulation of fire percolation across landscape served to discuss norms and actions to prevent fire. Overall, the game shows loopholes in forest protection in Bolivia that needs to incorporate people’s voices in land use planning policy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1335
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1335
url https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1335
identifier_str_mv 10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1335
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1335/702
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 56
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 56
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 56
2236-2886
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1
reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileira
instname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
instacron:ICMBIO
instname_str Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
instacron_str ICMBIO
institution ICMBIO
reponame_str Biodiversidade Brasileira
collection Biodiversidade Brasileira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br
_version_ 1797042392699764736