The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boschetti, Luigi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Roy, David
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biodiversidade Brasileira
Texto Completo: https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1090
Resumo: Inter-annual variability of fire activity is generally studied without explicit investigation of a suitable starting month for yearly calculations. Most studies use the calendar year, i.e. starting in January, while those that use a different starting month do so without explicit justification. In various scientific fields, annual periods are often not defined to start in January. For example, in hydrology the year is often considered to start with the beginning of the major precipitation season and to end in the subsequent dry season. Aggregating annual precipitation data using this definition, allows for the generation of more consistent yearly statistics as the major rainy season precipitation is aggregated together, and so there is less “carry over” among consecutive years. The same properties are desirable for inter-annual fire analysis. A “fire year” defined with similar criteria means that the analysis of fire inter-annual variability is also the analysis of the variability between fire seasons, which in turn may be more unambiguously linked to other climatological events. We initially introduced the concept of fire year based on the analysis of 37 months of global MODIS active fire detections (Boschetti and Roy, 2008). In the present paper, we revisit the fire year definition by considering the entire record (2002-2018) of the most recent MODIS Collection 6 global burned area product (Giglio et al., 2018). We examine the sensitivity of yearly fire calculations made with respect to changing the starting month of the calendar year definition, the impact of using inappropriate starting months, and suggest optimal starting months for analyses of global and select sub-continental scale fire inter-annual variability. Optimal starting months for analyses of global and sub-continental fire inter-annual variability are described. The research indicates that a fire year starting in April provides an optimal definition for annual global fire activity
id ICMBIO-1_607be9c88f6cf827003cbfd84eb86782
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1090
network_acronym_str ICMBIO-1
network_name_str Biodiversidade Brasileira
repository_id_str
spelling The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire ActivityThe Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire ActivityThe Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire ActivityInter-annual variability of fire activity is generally studied without explicit investigation of a suitable starting month for yearly calculations. Most studies use the calendar year, i.e. starting in January, while those that use a different starting month do so without explicit justification. In various scientific fields, annual periods are often not defined to start in January. For example, in hydrology the year is often considered to start with the beginning of the major precipitation season and to end in the subsequent dry season. Aggregating annual precipitation data using this definition, allows for the generation of more consistent yearly statistics as the major rainy season precipitation is aggregated together, and so there is less “carry over” among consecutive years. The same properties are desirable for inter-annual fire analysis. A “fire year” defined with similar criteria means that the analysis of fire inter-annual variability is also the analysis of the variability between fire seasons, which in turn may be more unambiguously linked to other climatological events. We initially introduced the concept of fire year based on the analysis of 37 months of global MODIS active fire detections (Boschetti and Roy, 2008). In the present paper, we revisit the fire year definition by considering the entire record (2002-2018) of the most recent MODIS Collection 6 global burned area product (Giglio et al., 2018). We examine the sensitivity of yearly fire calculations made with respect to changing the starting month of the calendar year definition, the impact of using inappropriate starting months, and suggest optimal starting months for analyses of global and select sub-continental scale fire inter-annual variability. Optimal starting months for analyses of global and sub-continental fire inter-annual variability are described. The research indicates that a fire year starting in April provides an optimal definition for annual global fire activityInter-annual variability of fire activity is generally studied without explicit investigation of a suitable starting month for yearly calculations. Most studies use the calendar year, i.e. starting in January, while those that use a different starting month do so without explicit justification. In various scientific fields, annual periods are often not defined to start in January. For example, in hydrology the year is often considered to start with the beginning of the major precipitation season and to end in the subsequent dry season. Aggregating annual precipitation data using this definition, allows for the generation of more consistent yearly statistics as the major rainy season precipitation is aggregated together, and so there is less “carry over” among consecutive years. The same properties are desirable for inter-annual fire analysis. A “fire year” defined with similar criteria means that the analysis of fire inter-annual variability is also the analysis of the variability between fire seasons, which in turn may be more unambiguously linked to other climatological events. We initially introduced the concept of fire year based on the analysis of 37 months of global MODIS active fire detections (Boschetti and Roy, 2008). In the present paper, we revisit the fire year definition by considering the entire record (2002-2018) of the most recent MODIS Collection 6 global burned area product (Giglio et al., 2018). We examine the sensitivity of yearly fire calculations made with respect to changing the starting month of the calendar year definition, the impact of using inappropriate starting months, and suggest optimal starting months for analyses of global and select sub-continental scale fire inter-annual variability. Optimal starting months for analyses of global and sub-continental fire inter-annual variability are described. The research indicates that a fire year starting in April provides an optimal definition for annual global fire activityInter-annual variability of fire activity is generally studied without explicit investigation of a suitable starting month for yearly calculations. Most studies use the calendar year, i.e. starting in January, while those that use a different starting month do so without explicit justification. In various scientific fields, annual periods are often not defined to start in January. For example, in hydrology the year is often considered to start with the beginning of the major precipitation season and to end in the subsequent dry season. Aggregating annual precipitation data using this definition, allows for the generation of more consistent yearly statistics as the major rainy season precipitation is aggregated together, and so there is less “carry over” among consecutive years. The same properties are desirable for inter-annual fire analysis. A “fire year” defined with similar criteria means that the analysis of fire inter-annual variability is also the analysis of the variability between fire seasons, which in turn may be more unambiguously linked to other climatological events. We initially introduced the concept of fire year based on the analysis of 37 months of global MODIS active fire detections (Boschetti and Roy, 2008). In the present paper, we revisit the fire year definition by considering the entire record (2002-2018) of the most recent MODIS Collection 6 global burned area product (Giglio et al., 2018). We examine the sensitivity of yearly fire calculations made with respect to changing the starting month of the calendar year definition, the impact of using inappropriate starting months, and suggest optimal starting months for analyses of global and select sub-continental scale fire inter-annual variability. Optimal starting months for analyses of global and sub-continental fire inter-annual variability are described. The research indicates that a fire year starting in April provides an optimal definition for annual global fire activityInstituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)2019-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/109010.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1090Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 175Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 175Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 1752236-288610.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileirainstname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)instacron:ICMBIOenghttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1090/823Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasilhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoschetti, LuigiRoy, David2023-05-09T12:56:02Zoai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1090Revistahttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBRPUBhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/oaifernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br2236-28862236-2886opendoar:2023-05-09T12:56:02Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
title The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
spellingShingle The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
Boschetti, Luigi
title_short The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
title_full The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
title_fullStr The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
title_full_unstemmed The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
title_sort The Fire Year: Definition of an Optimal Time Interval for the Analysis and Reporting of Global Fire Activity
author Boschetti, Luigi
author_facet Boschetti, Luigi
Roy, David
author_role author
author2 Roy, David
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boschetti, Luigi
Roy, David
description Inter-annual variability of fire activity is generally studied without explicit investigation of a suitable starting month for yearly calculations. Most studies use the calendar year, i.e. starting in January, while those that use a different starting month do so without explicit justification. In various scientific fields, annual periods are often not defined to start in January. For example, in hydrology the year is often considered to start with the beginning of the major precipitation season and to end in the subsequent dry season. Aggregating annual precipitation data using this definition, allows for the generation of more consistent yearly statistics as the major rainy season precipitation is aggregated together, and so there is less “carry over” among consecutive years. The same properties are desirable for inter-annual fire analysis. A “fire year” defined with similar criteria means that the analysis of fire inter-annual variability is also the analysis of the variability between fire seasons, which in turn may be more unambiguously linked to other climatological events. We initially introduced the concept of fire year based on the analysis of 37 months of global MODIS active fire detections (Boschetti and Roy, 2008). In the present paper, we revisit the fire year definition by considering the entire record (2002-2018) of the most recent MODIS Collection 6 global burned area product (Giglio et al., 2018). We examine the sensitivity of yearly fire calculations made with respect to changing the starting month of the calendar year definition, the impact of using inappropriate starting months, and suggest optimal starting months for analyses of global and select sub-continental scale fire inter-annual variability. Optimal starting months for analyses of global and sub-continental fire inter-annual variability are described. The research indicates that a fire year starting in April provides an optimal definition for annual global fire activity
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1090
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1090
url https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1090
identifier_str_mv 10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1090
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1090/823
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 175
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 175
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 175
2236-2886
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1
reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileira
instname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
instacron:ICMBIO
instname_str Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
instacron_str ICMBIO
institution ICMBIO
reponame_str Biodiversidade Brasileira
collection Biodiversidade Brasileira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br
_version_ 1797042391675305984