Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gameiro, Mariana Bombo Perozzi
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista IDEAS (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/168
Resumo: Conceptual and operational definitions on ruralities have changed through time. With them, theoretical normative and political proposals for rural development have also changed. This article reviews the international and national literature to briefly introduce the multiple notions of the term development, as well as its ideological use. After that, it deals with rural development models, characterizing the main elements that arise in expert discourses on the subject. Discussing the contemporary debate on rural development, the article highlights the incorporation of the conceptions of sustainability and territoriality, with decentralized and participatory methodologies. These paths of multiple ideas that involve rural development are analyzed under contemporary sociological theories, mainly Anthony Giddens’ concept of expert system. It is understood, therefore, that strategically placed agents reflexively regulate global conditions of reproduction change or continuity of social systems, fomenting “space-time distanciated” relations. 
id IDEAS_3a311f2aef47043f653fb447b9c75057
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/168
network_acronym_str IDEAS
network_name_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposalsPercursos do "desenvolvimento rural": uma análise de propostas peritonormativasruralitiesrural developmentexpert systemsruralidadesdesenvolvimento ruralsistemas peritosConceptual and operational definitions on ruralities have changed through time. With them, theoretical normative and political proposals for rural development have also changed. This article reviews the international and national literature to briefly introduce the multiple notions of the term development, as well as its ideological use. After that, it deals with rural development models, characterizing the main elements that arise in expert discourses on the subject. Discussing the contemporary debate on rural development, the article highlights the incorporation of the conceptions of sustainability and territoriality, with decentralized and participatory methodologies. These paths of multiple ideas that involve rural development are analyzed under contemporary sociological theories, mainly Anthony Giddens’ concept of expert system. It is understood, therefore, that strategically placed agents reflexively regulate global conditions of reproduction change or continuity of social systems, fomenting “space-time distanciated” relations. As definições conceituais e operacionais sobre as ruralidades se transformam ao longo do tempo. Com elas, alteram-se também as propostas teórico-normativas e políticas para o desenvolvimento rural. Este artigo recorre à literatura internacional e nacional para introduzir brevemente as múltiplas noções do termo desenvolvimento, bem como sua utilização ideológica; posteriormente aborda os modelos de desenvolvimento rural, caracterizando os principais elementos que despontam nos discursos peritos sobre o tema. Ao tratar do debate contemporâneo sobre desenvolvimento rural, o artigo destaca como este foi associado à noção de sustentabilidade e como incorporou, em suas propostas, metodologias descentralizadas, participativas e territorializadas. Esse percurso das múltiplas noções que envolvem o desenvolvimento rural é analisado à luz dateoria sociológica contemporânea, com destaque às formulações de Anthony Giddens acerca dos sistemas peritos. Entende-se, assim, que atores estrategicamente posicionados regulam reflexivamente as condições globais de reprodução – manutenção ou mudança – dos sistemas sociais, fomentando relações desencaixadas espaço temporalmente.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2016-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/168Revista IDeAS; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2014): janeiro a junho de 2014; 225-263Revista IDeAS; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2014): janeiro a junho de 2014; 225-263Revista IDeAS; v. 8 n. 1 (2014): janeiro a junho de 2014; 225-2631984-98341982-257Xreponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJporhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/168/167Copyright (c) 2014 Mariana Bombo Perozzi Gameiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGameiro, Mariana Bombo Perozzi2020-05-22T20:01:09Zoai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/168Revistahttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideasPUBhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/oairevistaideas@gmail.com||1984-98341982-257Xopendoar:2020-05-22T20:01:09Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
Percursos do "desenvolvimento rural": uma análise de propostas peritonormativas
title Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
spellingShingle Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
Gameiro, Mariana Bombo Perozzi
ruralities
rural development
expert systems
ruralidades
desenvolvimento rural
sistemas peritos
title_short Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
title_full Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
title_fullStr Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
title_full_unstemmed Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
title_sort Pathways of "rural development": an analysis of peritonormative proposals
author Gameiro, Mariana Bombo Perozzi
author_facet Gameiro, Mariana Bombo Perozzi
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gameiro, Mariana Bombo Perozzi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ruralities
rural development
expert systems
ruralidades
desenvolvimento rural
sistemas peritos
topic ruralities
rural development
expert systems
ruralidades
desenvolvimento rural
sistemas peritos
description Conceptual and operational definitions on ruralities have changed through time. With them, theoretical normative and political proposals for rural development have also changed. This article reviews the international and national literature to briefly introduce the multiple notions of the term development, as well as its ideological use. After that, it deals with rural development models, characterizing the main elements that arise in expert discourses on the subject. Discussing the contemporary debate on rural development, the article highlights the incorporation of the conceptions of sustainability and territoriality, with decentralized and participatory methodologies. These paths of multiple ideas that involve rural development are analyzed under contemporary sociological theories, mainly Anthony Giddens’ concept of expert system. It is understood, therefore, that strategically placed agents reflexively regulate global conditions of reproduction change or continuity of social systems, fomenting “space-time distanciated” relations. 
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/168
url https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/168/167
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Mariana Bombo Perozzi Gameiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Mariana Bombo Perozzi Gameiro
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IDeAS; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2014): janeiro a junho de 2014; 225-263
Revista IDeAS; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2014): janeiro a junho de 2014; 225-263
Revista IDeAS; v. 8 n. 1 (2014): janeiro a junho de 2014; 225-263
1984-9834
1982-257X
reponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
collection Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaideas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797231563633590272

Registros relacionados