Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit®
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Multi-Science Journal |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1215 |
Resumo: | The body mass index (BMI) and the maximum oxygen volume (VO2Max) are indicators used to assess obesity-related physical status, and to assess fitness and intensity control, respectively, and both are directly associated with the profile evaluated health. The aim's study is to evaluate and compare the profile of BMI and VO2Max values of the Crossfit® modality practitioners (GCF) and practitioners of random non-oriented physical activities (CG). Thirty-nine participants divided between GCF ((n = 20, years 20.4 ± 6.4; height (m) 1.6 ± 0.1; body mass (kg) 69.35 ± 11.63) and CG (n = 19, years 29.4 ± 8.2; height (m) 1.71 ± 0.1; body mass (kg) 76.3 ± 16.84)) were classified according to the physical activity level using the short version of IPAQ questionnaire and assessed using BMI and VO2Max obtained through anthropometric data. The results suggest that Crossfit® practitioners have lower values of BMI and higher values of VO2Max when compared to CG (BMI, GCF 23.7 ± 1.84; GC 26.4 ± 3.76; p = 0.009) (VO2Max, GCF 44.24 ± 5.09; GC 34.26 ± 6.63; p <0.001). Crossfit® practitioners have lower BMI and higher VO2Max compared to a group of random non-oriented physical activity practitioners. |
id |
IFGO-1_3d2a31524631b76596cbefc65025466a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1215 |
network_acronym_str |
IFGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Multi-Science Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit®PhysiologyVO2IPAQCardiovascular capacityMetabolismBMI.The body mass index (BMI) and the maximum oxygen volume (VO2Max) are indicators used to assess obesity-related physical status, and to assess fitness and intensity control, respectively, and both are directly associated with the profile evaluated health. The aim's study is to evaluate and compare the profile of BMI and VO2Max values of the Crossfit® modality practitioners (GCF) and practitioners of random non-oriented physical activities (CG). Thirty-nine participants divided between GCF ((n = 20, years 20.4 ± 6.4; height (m) 1.6 ± 0.1; body mass (kg) 69.35 ± 11.63) and CG (n = 19, years 29.4 ± 8.2; height (m) 1.71 ± 0.1; body mass (kg) 76.3 ± 16.84)) were classified according to the physical activity level using the short version of IPAQ questionnaire and assessed using BMI and VO2Max obtained through anthropometric data. The results suggest that Crossfit® practitioners have lower values of BMI and higher values of VO2Max when compared to CG (BMI, GCF 23.7 ± 1.84; GC 26.4 ± 3.76; p = 0.009) (VO2Max, GCF 44.24 ± 5.09; GC 34.26 ± 6.63; p <0.001). Crossfit® practitioners have lower BMI and higher VO2Max compared to a group of random non-oriented physical activity practitioners.Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí2020-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/121510.33837/msj.v3i1.1215Multi-Science Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020); 40-43Multi-Science Journal; v. 3 n. 1 (2020); 40-432359-69022359-6902reponame:Multi-Science Journalinstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano)instacron:IFGOenghttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1215/844Copyright (c) 2020 Sacha Claelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessClael, Sachade Sousa, Felipe FerreiraBrandão, Hiury Caio PinheiroBezerra, Lidia2020-09-01T11:45:56Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1215Revistahttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/index.php/multisciencePUBhttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/index.php/multiscience/oaiguilhermeifgoiano@gmail.com || multiscience@ifgoiano.edu.br || wesley.andrade@ifgoiano.edu.br2359-69022359-6902opendoar:2020-09-01T11:45:56Multi-Science Journal - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
title |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
spellingShingle |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® Clael, Sacha Physiology VO2 IPAQ Cardiovascular capacity Metabolism BMI. |
title_short |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
title_full |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
title_fullStr |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
title_sort |
Analysis and comparison of body mass index and estimated maximum oxygen consumption between practitioners and non-practitioners of CrossFit® |
author |
Clael, Sacha |
author_facet |
Clael, Sacha de Sousa, Felipe Ferreira Brandão, Hiury Caio Pinheiro Bezerra, Lidia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Sousa, Felipe Ferreira Brandão, Hiury Caio Pinheiro Bezerra, Lidia |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Clael, Sacha de Sousa, Felipe Ferreira Brandão, Hiury Caio Pinheiro Bezerra, Lidia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Physiology VO2 IPAQ Cardiovascular capacity Metabolism BMI. |
topic |
Physiology VO2 IPAQ Cardiovascular capacity Metabolism BMI. |
description |
The body mass index (BMI) and the maximum oxygen volume (VO2Max) are indicators used to assess obesity-related physical status, and to assess fitness and intensity control, respectively, and both are directly associated with the profile evaluated health. The aim's study is to evaluate and compare the profile of BMI and VO2Max values of the Crossfit® modality practitioners (GCF) and practitioners of random non-oriented physical activities (CG). Thirty-nine participants divided between GCF ((n = 20, years 20.4 ± 6.4; height (m) 1.6 ± 0.1; body mass (kg) 69.35 ± 11.63) and CG (n = 19, years 29.4 ± 8.2; height (m) 1.71 ± 0.1; body mass (kg) 76.3 ± 16.84)) were classified according to the physical activity level using the short version of IPAQ questionnaire and assessed using BMI and VO2Max obtained through anthropometric data. The results suggest that Crossfit® practitioners have lower values of BMI and higher values of VO2Max when compared to CG (BMI, GCF 23.7 ± 1.84; GC 26.4 ± 3.76; p = 0.009) (VO2Max, GCF 44.24 ± 5.09; GC 34.26 ± 6.63; p <0.001). Crossfit® practitioners have lower BMI and higher VO2Max compared to a group of random non-oriented physical activity practitioners. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1215 10.33837/msj.v3i1.1215 |
url |
https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1215 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33837/msj.v3i1.1215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1215/844 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Sacha Clael info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Sacha Clael |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi-Science Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020); 40-43 Multi-Science Journal; v. 3 n. 1 (2020); 40-43 2359-6902 2359-6902 reponame:Multi-Science Journal instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano) instacron:IFGO |
instname_str |
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano) |
instacron_str |
IFGO |
institution |
IFGO |
reponame_str |
Multi-Science Journal |
collection |
Multi-Science Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Multi-Science Journal - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
guilhermeifgoiano@gmail.com || multiscience@ifgoiano.edu.br || wesley.andrade@ifgoiano.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798325176276877312 |