Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Krupahtz, Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Albretch, Gabriel, Velasco, Jefferson Lewis, Teixeira, Júlio Monteiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Poliedro
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/article/view/3352
Resumo: The use and rise of new digital tools highlighted by the emergency increase in remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, good practices can be established for better development of new tools. For this, the objective of this research is to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on digital visual tools in the context of design education. As methodological procedures, the steps used were the ones proposed by Dresch, Lacerda and Antunes Júnior (2014), which aim at research within the scope of Design Science Research, namely: (i) definition of the review question and the conceptual framework; (ii) choice of the work team; (iii) search strategy; (iv) search, eligibility and coding; (v) quality assessment; and (vi) results’ synthesis. The final stage of presenting the study consists of publishing this article. Searches were carried out in six databases, obtaining 722 articles, from journals and procedures. After analysis, coding and reading of the texts, nine articles were selected for the compilation of results, and two more were added using the snowball technique. The main themes addressed by the studies were then raised, such as the concept of Creativity Support Tools (CST), visual thinking and collaborative design. Ten artifacts developed in these studies were also identified, which were grouped into problem classes and had their construction and contingency heuristics mapped. Finally, other concepts were added to the discussion, such as evaluation and reflection on the process, interdisciplinary practice, mutual awareness and instrumental judgment. These concepts, added to the initial ones, served as a label for the mapped heuristics and thus a guideline diagram was built for the development of digital visual tools. As recommendation for future work, it is suggested to use and value the term Creativity Support Tools for tools that use the principles mentioned in this research.
id IFSUL_a9d44a5c4f681262953d8b5a18f8d45b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3352
network_acronym_str IFSUL
network_name_str Revista Poliedro
repository_id_str
spelling Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic reviewDiretrizes para ferramentas visuais digitais voltadas ao ensino em design a partir de uma revisão sistemáticaFerramentas DigitaisEnsino em DesignRevisão SistemáticaDesign Science ResearchFerramentas de Suporte a CriatividadeThe use and rise of new digital tools highlighted by the emergency increase in remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, good practices can be established for better development of new tools. For this, the objective of this research is to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on digital visual tools in the context of design education. As methodological procedures, the steps used were the ones proposed by Dresch, Lacerda and Antunes Júnior (2014), which aim at research within the scope of Design Science Research, namely: (i) definition of the review question and the conceptual framework; (ii) choice of the work team; (iii) search strategy; (iv) search, eligibility and coding; (v) quality assessment; and (vi) results’ synthesis. The final stage of presenting the study consists of publishing this article. Searches were carried out in six databases, obtaining 722 articles, from journals and procedures. After analysis, coding and reading of the texts, nine articles were selected for the compilation of results, and two more were added using the snowball technique. The main themes addressed by the studies were then raised, such as the concept of Creativity Support Tools (CST), visual thinking and collaborative design. Ten artifacts developed in these studies were also identified, which were grouped into problem classes and had their construction and contingency heuristics mapped. Finally, other concepts were added to the discussion, such as evaluation and reflection on the process, interdisciplinary practice, mutual awareness and instrumental judgment. These concepts, added to the initial ones, served as a label for the mapped heuristics and thus a guideline diagram was built for the development of digital visual tools. As recommendation for future work, it is suggested to use and value the term Creativity Support Tools for tools that use the principles mentioned in this research.O uso e o surgimento de ferramentas digitais se destacaram com o incremento emergencial do ensino remoto durante a pandemia da COVID-19. Neste contexto, boas práticas podem ser estabelecidas na intenção de facilitar o desenvolvimento de novas ferramentas. Para isto, o objetivo desta pesquisa é realizar uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura (RSL) sobre ferramentas visuais digitais no contexto do ensino em design. Como procedimentos metodológicos, foram utilizadas as etapas propostas por Dresch, Lacerda e Antunes Júnior (2014), voltadas a pesquisas dentro do escopo da Design Science Research, a saber: (i) definição da questão da revisão e do framework conceitual; (ii) escolha da equipe de trabalho; (iii) estratégia de busca; (iv) busca, elegibilidade e codificação; (v) avaliação da qualidade; e (vi) síntese dos resultados. A etapa final de apresentação do estudo consiste na publicação deste artigo. Foram realizadas buscas em seis bases de dados, obtendo-se 722 itens, entre artigos de periódicos e anais de eventos. Destes, nove artigos foram selecionados para a compilação de resultados após a realização de análise, codificação e leitura dos textos, sendo adicionados mais dois a partir da técnica de bola-de-neve. Foram então levantadas as principais temáticas abordadas pelos estudos, como o conceito de Creativity Support Tools (CST), pensamento visual e design colaborativo. Também foram identificados 10 artefatos desenvolvidos nestes estudos, os quais foram agrupados em classes de problemas e tiveram mapeadas suas heurísticas de construção e contingenciais. Por fim, outros conceitos foram adicionados à discussão, como o de avaliação e reflexão sobre o processo, a prática interdisciplinar, a consciência mútua e o julgamento instrumental. Estes conceitos, somados aos iniciais, serviram como rótulo para as heurísticas mapeadas e assim foi construído um diagrama de diretrizes para o desenvolvimento de ferramentas visuais digitais. Como recomendação a trabalhos futuros, deixa-se a sugestão de uso e valorização do termo Creativity Support Tools para as ferramentas que utilizarem os princípios mencionados nesta pesquisa.Instituto Federal Sul-rio-grandense, Câmpus Pelotas2024-02-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/article/view/335210.15536/2594-4398.2024.v8.n10.pp.041-077.3352Poliedro Journal; Vol. 8 No. 10 (2024): Revista Poliedro; 041-077Revista Poliedro; v. 8 n. 10 (2024): Revista Poliedro; 041-0772594-439810.15536/2594-4398.2024.v8.n10reponame:Revista Poliedroinstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense (IFSUL)instacron:IFSULporhttps://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/article/view/3352/2336Copyright (c) 2024 Juliana Krupahtz, Gabriel Albretch, Jefferson Lewis Velasco, Júlio Monteiro Teixeirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKrupahtz, JulianaAlbretch, GabrielVelasco, Jefferson LewisTeixeira, Júlio Monteiro2024-02-06T13:55:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3352Revistahttp://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedroPUBhttp://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/oairevistapoliedro@gmail.com||2594-43982594-4398opendoar:2024-02-06T13:55:13Revista Poliedro - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense (IFSUL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
Diretrizes para ferramentas visuais digitais voltadas ao ensino em design a partir de uma revisão sistemática
title Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
spellingShingle Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
Krupahtz, Juliana
Ferramentas Digitais
Ensino em Design
Revisão Sistemática
Design Science Research
Ferramentas de Suporte a Criatividade
title_short Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
title_full Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
title_fullStr Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
title_sort Guidelines for visual digital tools geared towards teaching in design from a systematic review
author Krupahtz, Juliana
author_facet Krupahtz, Juliana
Albretch, Gabriel
Velasco, Jefferson Lewis
Teixeira, Júlio Monteiro
author_role author
author2 Albretch, Gabriel
Velasco, Jefferson Lewis
Teixeira, Júlio Monteiro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Krupahtz, Juliana
Albretch, Gabriel
Velasco, Jefferson Lewis
Teixeira, Júlio Monteiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ferramentas Digitais
Ensino em Design
Revisão Sistemática
Design Science Research
Ferramentas de Suporte a Criatividade
topic Ferramentas Digitais
Ensino em Design
Revisão Sistemática
Design Science Research
Ferramentas de Suporte a Criatividade
description The use and rise of new digital tools highlighted by the emergency increase in remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, good practices can be established for better development of new tools. For this, the objective of this research is to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on digital visual tools in the context of design education. As methodological procedures, the steps used were the ones proposed by Dresch, Lacerda and Antunes Júnior (2014), which aim at research within the scope of Design Science Research, namely: (i) definition of the review question and the conceptual framework; (ii) choice of the work team; (iii) search strategy; (iv) search, eligibility and coding; (v) quality assessment; and (vi) results’ synthesis. The final stage of presenting the study consists of publishing this article. Searches were carried out in six databases, obtaining 722 articles, from journals and procedures. After analysis, coding and reading of the texts, nine articles were selected for the compilation of results, and two more were added using the snowball technique. The main themes addressed by the studies were then raised, such as the concept of Creativity Support Tools (CST), visual thinking and collaborative design. Ten artifacts developed in these studies were also identified, which were grouped into problem classes and had their construction and contingency heuristics mapped. Finally, other concepts were added to the discussion, such as evaluation and reflection on the process, interdisciplinary practice, mutual awareness and instrumental judgment. These concepts, added to the initial ones, served as a label for the mapped heuristics and thus a guideline diagram was built for the development of digital visual tools. As recommendation for future work, it is suggested to use and value the term Creativity Support Tools for tools that use the principles mentioned in this research.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/article/view/3352
10.15536/2594-4398.2024.v8.n10.pp.041-077.3352
url https://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/article/view/3352
identifier_str_mv 10.15536/2594-4398.2024.v8.n10.pp.041-077.3352
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ifsul.edu.br/index.php/poliedro/article/view/3352/2336
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Federal Sul-rio-grandense, Câmpus Pelotas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Federal Sul-rio-grandense, Câmpus Pelotas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Poliedro Journal; Vol. 8 No. 10 (2024): Revista Poliedro; 041-077
Revista Poliedro; v. 8 n. 10 (2024): Revista Poliedro; 041-077
2594-4398
10.15536/2594-4398.2024.v8.n10
reponame:Revista Poliedro
instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense (IFSUL)
instacron:IFSUL
instname_str Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense (IFSUL)
instacron_str IFSUL
institution IFSUL
reponame_str Revista Poliedro
collection Revista Poliedro
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Poliedro - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense (IFSUL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistapoliedro@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797069033599664128