Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300553 |
Resumo: | Many manuscripts comparing populations and/or analysing the structure of animal communities use indexes of captures as synonymous of abundance. However, the basic methods more suitable to this assumption - probabilistic estimates based on equal capture probability - have not been considered. In this study, the deviations caused by different types of capture indexes are compared with a common probabilistic population estimator (Cormack-Jolly-Seber). The analyses showed that Minimum Number Known Alive (MNKA) and the number of individuals showed greater association with the population estimator than with non-probabilistic indexes based on recaptures. Therefore, none of the indexes presented the same performance to estimate population size estimation which can lead to ecological misinterpretation. Some recommendations were also described. |
id |
IIE-1_380a45bd607c2bcbd2f951b5983404c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1519-69842014000300553 |
network_acronym_str |
IIE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern BrazilCormack-Jolly-SeberMNKAnumber of individualstotal capturescapture successMany manuscripts comparing populations and/or analysing the structure of animal communities use indexes of captures as synonymous of abundance. However, the basic methods more suitable to this assumption - probabilistic estimates based on equal capture probability - have not been considered. In this study, the deviations caused by different types of capture indexes are compared with a common probabilistic population estimator (Cormack-Jolly-Seber). The analyses showed that Minimum Number Known Alive (MNKA) and the number of individuals showed greater association with the population estimator than with non-probabilistic indexes based on recaptures. Therefore, none of the indexes presented the same performance to estimate population size estimation which can lead to ecological misinterpretation. Some recommendations were also described.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300553Brazilian Journal of Biology v.74 n.3 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/bjb.2014.0077info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGraipel,MEHernández,MIMSalvador,Ceng2015-10-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842014000300553Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2015-10-26T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
title |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil Graipel,ME Cormack-Jolly-Seber MNKA number of individuals total captures capture success |
title_short |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
title_full |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
title_sort |
Evaluation of abundance indexes in open population studies: a comparison in populations of small mammals in southern Brazil |
author |
Graipel,ME |
author_facet |
Graipel,ME Hernández,MIM Salvador,C |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hernández,MIM Salvador,C |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Graipel,ME Hernández,MIM Salvador,C |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cormack-Jolly-Seber MNKA number of individuals total captures capture success |
topic |
Cormack-Jolly-Seber MNKA number of individuals total captures capture success |
description |
Many manuscripts comparing populations and/or analysing the structure of animal communities use indexes of captures as synonymous of abundance. However, the basic methods more suitable to this assumption - probabilistic estimates based on equal capture probability - have not been considered. In this study, the deviations caused by different types of capture indexes are compared with a common probabilistic population estimator (Cormack-Jolly-Seber). The analyses showed that Minimum Number Known Alive (MNKA) and the number of individuals showed greater association with the population estimator than with non-probabilistic indexes based on recaptures. Therefore, none of the indexes presented the same performance to estimate population size estimation which can lead to ecological misinterpretation. Some recommendations were also described. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300553 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300553 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/bjb.2014.0077 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology v.74 n.3 2014 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) instacron:IIE |
instname_str |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
instacron_str |
IIE |
institution |
IIE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br |
_version_ |
1752129880402690048 |