Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza,E. A.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Zaluski,R., Veiga,N., Orsi,R. O.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842016000200396
Resumo: Abstract The effects of seasonal variations and the methods of collection of propolis produced by Africanized honey bees Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, on the composition of constituent minerals such as magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), and potassium (K) were evaluated. Propolis was harvested from 25 beehives by scraping or by means of propolis collectors (screen, “intelligent” collector propolis [ICP], lateral opening of the super [LOS], and underlay method). During the one-year study, the propolis produced was harvested each month, ground, homogenized, and stored in a freezer at -10 ºC. Seasonal analyses of the mineral composition were carried out by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and the results were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test to compare the mean values (p<0.05). The results showed that seasonal variations influence the contents of 5 minerals (Mg, Fe, Na, Ca, and Cu), and the propolis harvesting method affects the contents of 4 minerals (Mg, Zn, Fe, and Ca).
id IIE-1_3b7e93df6fbaf1f234bc25c7baf27323
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-69842016000200396
network_acronym_str IIE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehivesseasonalitymacro- and micro-mineralpropolis collectorsspectrophotometryqualityAbstract The effects of seasonal variations and the methods of collection of propolis produced by Africanized honey bees Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, on the composition of constituent minerals such as magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), and potassium (K) were evaluated. Propolis was harvested from 25 beehives by scraping or by means of propolis collectors (screen, “intelligent” collector propolis [ICP], lateral opening of the super [LOS], and underlay method). During the one-year study, the propolis produced was harvested each month, ground, homogenized, and stored in a freezer at -10 ºC. Seasonal analyses of the mineral composition were carried out by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and the results were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test to compare the mean values (p<0.05). The results showed that seasonal variations influence the contents of 5 minerals (Mg, Fe, Na, Ca, and Cu), and the propolis harvesting method affects the contents of 4 minerals (Mg, Zn, Fe, and Ca).Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842016000200396Brazilian Journal of Biology v.76 n.2 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/1519-6984.16714info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza,E. A.Zaluski,R.Veiga,N.Orsi,R. O.eng2016-06-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842016000200396Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2016-06-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
title Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
spellingShingle Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
Souza,E. A.
seasonality
macro- and micro-mineral
propolis collectors
spectrophotometry
quality
title_short Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
title_full Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
title_fullStr Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
title_full_unstemmed Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
title_sort Effects of seasonal variations and collection methods on the mineral composition of propolis from Apis mellifera Linnaeus Beehives
author Souza,E. A.
author_facet Souza,E. A.
Zaluski,R.
Veiga,N.
Orsi,R. O.
author_role author
author2 Zaluski,R.
Veiga,N.
Orsi,R. O.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza,E. A.
Zaluski,R.
Veiga,N.
Orsi,R. O.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv seasonality
macro- and micro-mineral
propolis collectors
spectrophotometry
quality
topic seasonality
macro- and micro-mineral
propolis collectors
spectrophotometry
quality
description Abstract The effects of seasonal variations and the methods of collection of propolis produced by Africanized honey bees Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, on the composition of constituent minerals such as magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), and potassium (K) were evaluated. Propolis was harvested from 25 beehives by scraping or by means of propolis collectors (screen, “intelligent” collector propolis [ICP], lateral opening of the super [LOS], and underlay method). During the one-year study, the propolis produced was harvested each month, ground, homogenized, and stored in a freezer at -10 ºC. Seasonal analyses of the mineral composition were carried out by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and the results were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test to compare the mean values (p<0.05). The results showed that seasonal variations influence the contents of 5 minerals (Mg, Fe, Na, Ca, and Cu), and the propolis harvesting method affects the contents of 4 minerals (Mg, Zn, Fe, and Ca).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842016000200396
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842016000200396
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1519-6984.16714
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology v.76 n.2 2016
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
collection Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br
_version_ 1752129882901446656