Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vecchi,MB
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Alves,MAS
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842015000400742
Resumo: AbstractMist nets may be opened at different heights in the forest, but they are seldom used over 3 m above the ground. We used two different methods to compare species richness, composition, and relative abundance and trophic structure of the bird assemblage at Ilha Grande (with a 290 birds standardization): conventional ground-level nets (0-2.4 m height range) and elevated nets (0-17 m) with an adjustable-height system (modified from Humphrey et al., 1968) that we call vertically-mobile nets. There were significant differences in capture frequencies between methods for about 20% of the species (Chi-squared test, P<0.05), and the two methods caught different assemblages. Ground-level nets recorded less species, and they comparatively overestimated mainly Suboscine insectivores and underestimated frugivores and nectarivores. Different sampling methods used at the same location may result in very different diagnoses of the avifauna present, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We encourage studies involving mist net sampling to include the upper strata to more accurately represent the avifauna in Atlantic Forest.
id IIE-1_427c79efbf8cff3cea2738c4233ca2c1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-69842015000400742
network_acronym_str IIE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository_id_str
spelling Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level netscanopyhigh netsmist net samplingtrophic structurevertical stratificationAbstractMist nets may be opened at different heights in the forest, but they are seldom used over 3 m above the ground. We used two different methods to compare species richness, composition, and relative abundance and trophic structure of the bird assemblage at Ilha Grande (with a 290 birds standardization): conventional ground-level nets (0-2.4 m height range) and elevated nets (0-17 m) with an adjustable-height system (modified from Humphrey et al., 1968) that we call vertically-mobile nets. There were significant differences in capture frequencies between methods for about 20% of the species (Chi-squared test, P<0.05), and the two methods caught different assemblages. Ground-level nets recorded less species, and they comparatively overestimated mainly Suboscine insectivores and underestimated frugivores and nectarivores. Different sampling methods used at the same location may result in very different diagnoses of the avifauna present, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We encourage studies involving mist net sampling to include the upper strata to more accurately represent the avifauna in Atlantic Forest.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842015000400742Brazilian Journal of Biology v.75 n.3 2015reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/1519-6984.00914info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVecchi,MBAlves,MASeng2015-10-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842015000400742Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2015-10-01T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
title Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
spellingShingle Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
Vecchi,MB
canopy
high nets
mist net sampling
trophic structure
vertical stratification
title_short Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
title_full Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
title_fullStr Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
title_full_unstemmed Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
title_sort Bird assemblage mist-netted in an Atlantic Forest area: a comparison between vertically-mobile and ground-level nets
author Vecchi,MB
author_facet Vecchi,MB
Alves,MAS
author_role author
author2 Alves,MAS
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vecchi,MB
Alves,MAS
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv canopy
high nets
mist net sampling
trophic structure
vertical stratification
topic canopy
high nets
mist net sampling
trophic structure
vertical stratification
description AbstractMist nets may be opened at different heights in the forest, but they are seldom used over 3 m above the ground. We used two different methods to compare species richness, composition, and relative abundance and trophic structure of the bird assemblage at Ilha Grande (with a 290 birds standardization): conventional ground-level nets (0-2.4 m height range) and elevated nets (0-17 m) with an adjustable-height system (modified from Humphrey et al., 1968) that we call vertically-mobile nets. There were significant differences in capture frequencies between methods for about 20% of the species (Chi-squared test, P<0.05), and the two methods caught different assemblages. Ground-level nets recorded less species, and they comparatively overestimated mainly Suboscine insectivores and underestimated frugivores and nectarivores. Different sampling methods used at the same location may result in very different diagnoses of the avifauna present, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We encourage studies involving mist net sampling to include the upper strata to more accurately represent the avifauna in Atlantic Forest.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842015000400742
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842015000400742
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1519-6984.00914
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology v.75 n.3 2015
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
collection Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br
_version_ 1752129881681952768