Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira,ALM
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Pires,AS, Nunes-Freitas,AF, Oliveira,NM, Resende,AS, Campello,EFC
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300538
Resumo: Trapping methods can strongly influence the sampling of mammal communities. This study compared the efficiency of the capture of small mammals in Sherman traps in two positions (at ground level and in trees) and pitfall traps in a fragmented landscape. Trapping sessions were carried out between October 2008 and October 2009 at two fragments (8 and 17 ha), an agroforest corridor between them, and the adjacent pasture. A total effort of 4622 trap-nights resulted in 155 captures of 137 individuals from six species. Pitfalls had greater success (4.03%), followed by Shermans on the ground (2.98%) and on trees (2.37%; χ2= 6.50, p = 0.04). Five species were caught in Sherman ground traps, four in pitfalls and just two on trees. There was no difference among trap types for marsupials (χ2 = 4.75; p = 0.09), while for rodents, pitfalls were more efficient than Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.02). As a result, the efficiency of each trap type differed among habitats, due to differences in their species composition. Pitfalls were more efficient in the rainy season (Fisher's exact test, p <0.0001) while Shermans on trees were more efficient in the dry season (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.009). There was no difference between seasons for Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.76). Considering the results found, we recommend that future studies of forest mammal communities, particularly those designed to test the effects of forest fragmentation, include combinations of different trap types.
id IIE-1_6238d974615b97a473b124a7e881d999
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-69842014000300538
network_acronym_str IIE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository_id_str
spelling Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitatpitfall trapsSherman trapstrap efficiencymarsupialsrodentsTrapping methods can strongly influence the sampling of mammal communities. This study compared the efficiency of the capture of small mammals in Sherman traps in two positions (at ground level and in trees) and pitfall traps in a fragmented landscape. Trapping sessions were carried out between October 2008 and October 2009 at two fragments (8 and 17 ha), an agroforest corridor between them, and the adjacent pasture. A total effort of 4622 trap-nights resulted in 155 captures of 137 individuals from six species. Pitfalls had greater success (4.03%), followed by Shermans on the ground (2.98%) and on trees (2.37%; χ2= 6.50, p = 0.04). Five species were caught in Sherman ground traps, four in pitfalls and just two on trees. There was no difference among trap types for marsupials (χ2 = 4.75; p = 0.09), while for rodents, pitfalls were more efficient than Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.02). As a result, the efficiency of each trap type differed among habitats, due to differences in their species composition. Pitfalls were more efficient in the rainy season (Fisher's exact test, p <0.0001) while Shermans on trees were more efficient in the dry season (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.009). There was no difference between seasons for Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.76). Considering the results found, we recommend that future studies of forest mammal communities, particularly those designed to test the effects of forest fragmentation, include combinations of different trap types.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300538Brazilian Journal of Biology v.74 n.3 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/bjb.2014.0075info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira,ALMPires,ASNunes-Freitas,AFOliveira,NMResende,ASCampello,EFCeng2015-10-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842014000300538Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2015-10-26T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
title Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
spellingShingle Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
Vieira,ALM
pitfall traps
Sherman traps
trap efficiency
marsupials
rodents
title_short Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
title_full Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
title_fullStr Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
title_sort Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat
author Vieira,ALM
author_facet Vieira,ALM
Pires,AS
Nunes-Freitas,AF
Oliveira,NM
Resende,AS
Campello,EFC
author_role author
author2 Pires,AS
Nunes-Freitas,AF
Oliveira,NM
Resende,AS
Campello,EFC
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira,ALM
Pires,AS
Nunes-Freitas,AF
Oliveira,NM
Resende,AS
Campello,EFC
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv pitfall traps
Sherman traps
trap efficiency
marsupials
rodents
topic pitfall traps
Sherman traps
trap efficiency
marsupials
rodents
description Trapping methods can strongly influence the sampling of mammal communities. This study compared the efficiency of the capture of small mammals in Sherman traps in two positions (at ground level and in trees) and pitfall traps in a fragmented landscape. Trapping sessions were carried out between October 2008 and October 2009 at two fragments (8 and 17 ha), an agroforest corridor between them, and the adjacent pasture. A total effort of 4622 trap-nights resulted in 155 captures of 137 individuals from six species. Pitfalls had greater success (4.03%), followed by Shermans on the ground (2.98%) and on trees (2.37%; χ2= 6.50, p = 0.04). Five species were caught in Sherman ground traps, four in pitfalls and just two on trees. There was no difference among trap types for marsupials (χ2 = 4.75; p = 0.09), while for rodents, pitfalls were more efficient than Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.02). As a result, the efficiency of each trap type differed among habitats, due to differences in their species composition. Pitfalls were more efficient in the rainy season (Fisher's exact test, p <0.0001) while Shermans on trees were more efficient in the dry season (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.009). There was no difference between seasons for Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.76). Considering the results found, we recommend that future studies of forest mammal communities, particularly those designed to test the effects of forest fragmentation, include combinations of different trap types.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300538
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842014000300538
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/bjb.2014.0075
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology v.74 n.3 2014
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
collection Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br
_version_ 1752129880398495744