An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas,J. R.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Mantovani,W.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842018000300517
Resumo: Abstract Functional diversity is increasingly pointed as a useful approach to reach Biological Conservation goals. Here, we provide an overview of the functional diversity approach status in the Biological Conservation field. We sought for peer-reviewed papers published over a period of twenty years (from 1994 to 2014). First we used the general topic “functional diversity” and then refined our search using the key-word “conservation”. We have identified the conservation strategies addressed, the organism studied, and the continent of study site in each paper. Thirteen classes of conservation strategies were identified. Plants were the most commonly studied organism group and most study-sites were located in Europe. The functional diversity approach was introduced in the Biological Conservation field in the early 2000’s and its inclusion in conservation strategies is broadly advised. However, the number of papers that operationalise such inclusion by developing models and systems is still low. Functional diversity responds differently and eventually better than other measures to changes in land use and management, which suggests that this approach can potentially better predict the impacts. More studies are needed to corroborate this hypothesis. We pointed out knowledge gaps regarding identification of the responses for functional diversity about urban impacts and in research on the level of management intensity of land needed to maintain functional diversity. We recommend the use of functional diversity measures to find ecological indicators. Future studies should focus on the development of functional diversity measures of other taxa beyond plants as well as test hypothesis in tropical ecosystems.
id IIE-1_6337c943a4b32f97e596658f869a49bb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-69842018000300517
network_acronym_str IIE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository_id_str
spelling An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservationbiodiversity assessmentsbiodiversity measuresconservation strategiesecosystem functioningtrait-based approachAbstract Functional diversity is increasingly pointed as a useful approach to reach Biological Conservation goals. Here, we provide an overview of the functional diversity approach status in the Biological Conservation field. We sought for peer-reviewed papers published over a period of twenty years (from 1994 to 2014). First we used the general topic “functional diversity” and then refined our search using the key-word “conservation”. We have identified the conservation strategies addressed, the organism studied, and the continent of study site in each paper. Thirteen classes of conservation strategies were identified. Plants were the most commonly studied organism group and most study-sites were located in Europe. The functional diversity approach was introduced in the Biological Conservation field in the early 2000’s and its inclusion in conservation strategies is broadly advised. However, the number of papers that operationalise such inclusion by developing models and systems is still low. Functional diversity responds differently and eventually better than other measures to changes in land use and management, which suggests that this approach can potentially better predict the impacts. More studies are needed to corroborate this hypothesis. We pointed out knowledge gaps regarding identification of the responses for functional diversity about urban impacts and in research on the level of management intensity of land needed to maintain functional diversity. We recommend the use of functional diversity measures to find ecological indicators. Future studies should focus on the development of functional diversity measures of other taxa beyond plants as well as test hypothesis in tropical ecosystems.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842018000300517Brazilian Journal of Biology v.78 n.3 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/1519-6984.09416info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas,J. R.Mantovani,W.eng2018-07-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842018000300517Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2018-07-03T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
title An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
spellingShingle An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
Freitas,J. R.
biodiversity assessments
biodiversity measures
conservation strategies
ecosystem functioning
trait-based approach
title_short An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
title_full An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
title_fullStr An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
title_full_unstemmed An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
title_sort An overview of the applicability of functional diversity in Biological Conservation
author Freitas,J. R.
author_facet Freitas,J. R.
Mantovani,W.
author_role author
author2 Mantovani,W.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas,J. R.
Mantovani,W.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biodiversity assessments
biodiversity measures
conservation strategies
ecosystem functioning
trait-based approach
topic biodiversity assessments
biodiversity measures
conservation strategies
ecosystem functioning
trait-based approach
description Abstract Functional diversity is increasingly pointed as a useful approach to reach Biological Conservation goals. Here, we provide an overview of the functional diversity approach status in the Biological Conservation field. We sought for peer-reviewed papers published over a period of twenty years (from 1994 to 2014). First we used the general topic “functional diversity” and then refined our search using the key-word “conservation”. We have identified the conservation strategies addressed, the organism studied, and the continent of study site in each paper. Thirteen classes of conservation strategies were identified. Plants were the most commonly studied organism group and most study-sites were located in Europe. The functional diversity approach was introduced in the Biological Conservation field in the early 2000’s and its inclusion in conservation strategies is broadly advised. However, the number of papers that operationalise such inclusion by developing models and systems is still low. Functional diversity responds differently and eventually better than other measures to changes in land use and management, which suggests that this approach can potentially better predict the impacts. More studies are needed to corroborate this hypothesis. We pointed out knowledge gaps regarding identification of the responses for functional diversity about urban impacts and in research on the level of management intensity of land needed to maintain functional diversity. We recommend the use of functional diversity measures to find ecological indicators. Future studies should focus on the development of functional diversity measures of other taxa beyond plants as well as test hypothesis in tropical ecosystems.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842018000300517
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842018000300517
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1519-6984.09416
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology v.78 n.3 2018
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
collection Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br
_version_ 1752129884926246912