Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842021000300719 |
Resumo: | Abstract Six different bread wheat genotypes; two Egyptian commercial varieties (control); Giza-168 and Gemmeiza-11, and four promising lines; L84 and L148, resulted via hybridization and M10 and M34 via radiation mutation program) were rheologically evaluated using extensograph and for protein, analysis using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The radiation mutant M10 and M34 had the highest maximum resistance which is a very good indicator of strong gluten. The amount of gluten content was higher in M10, L148, and M34 compared to the control samples Gz168 and Gm11. Sulfide amino acids (CYS and MET) are slightly higher in M10. The electrophoretic results and amino acid analyzers show that the best technological quality was exhibited by M10. Radiation mutants wheat genotypes have a protein with good characteristics, mainly gluten which is significantly higher compared to control samples. The rheological properties measured as extensograph and gel electrophoresis were much better in irradiated lines M10 and M34. |
id |
IIE-1_6f2b1b4167b0a5400f7e5de11e558e40 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1519-69842021000300719 |
network_acronym_str |
IIE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypesradiation mutationextensographSDS-PAGEsulfide amino acidscysteineAbstract Six different bread wheat genotypes; two Egyptian commercial varieties (control); Giza-168 and Gemmeiza-11, and four promising lines; L84 and L148, resulted via hybridization and M10 and M34 via radiation mutation program) were rheologically evaluated using extensograph and for protein, analysis using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The radiation mutant M10 and M34 had the highest maximum resistance which is a very good indicator of strong gluten. The amount of gluten content was higher in M10, L148, and M34 compared to the control samples Gz168 and Gm11. Sulfide amino acids (CYS and MET) are slightly higher in M10. The electrophoretic results and amino acid analyzers show that the best technological quality was exhibited by M10. Radiation mutants wheat genotypes have a protein with good characteristics, mainly gluten which is significantly higher compared to control samples. The rheological properties measured as extensograph and gel electrophoresis were much better in irradiated lines M10 and M34.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842021000300719Brazilian Journal of Biology v.81 n.3 2021reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/1519-6984.230403info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdelaleem,M. A.Al-Azab,K. F.eng2021-03-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842021000300719Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2021-03-29T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
title |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes Abdelaleem,M. A. radiation mutation extensograph SDS-PAGE sulfide amino acids cysteine |
title_short |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
title_full |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
title_sort |
Evaluation of flour protein for different bread wheat genotypes |
author |
Abdelaleem,M. A. |
author_facet |
Abdelaleem,M. A. Al-Azab,K. F. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Al-Azab,K. F. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abdelaleem,M. A. Al-Azab,K. F. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
radiation mutation extensograph SDS-PAGE sulfide amino acids cysteine |
topic |
radiation mutation extensograph SDS-PAGE sulfide amino acids cysteine |
description |
Abstract Six different bread wheat genotypes; two Egyptian commercial varieties (control); Giza-168 and Gemmeiza-11, and four promising lines; L84 and L148, resulted via hybridization and M10 and M34 via radiation mutation program) were rheologically evaluated using extensograph and for protein, analysis using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The radiation mutant M10 and M34 had the highest maximum resistance which is a very good indicator of strong gluten. The amount of gluten content was higher in M10, L148, and M34 compared to the control samples Gz168 and Gm11. Sulfide amino acids (CYS and MET) are slightly higher in M10. The electrophoretic results and amino acid analyzers show that the best technological quality was exhibited by M10. Radiation mutants wheat genotypes have a protein with good characteristics, mainly gluten which is significantly higher compared to control samples. The rheological properties measured as extensograph and gel electrophoresis were much better in irradiated lines M10 and M34. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842021000300719 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842021000300719 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1519-6984.230403 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology v.81 n.3 2021 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) instacron:IIE |
instname_str |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
instacron_str |
IIE |
institution |
IIE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br |
_version_ |
1752129888052051968 |