Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842023000100153 |
Resumo: | Abstract The medicinal attributes of honey appears to overshadow its importance as a functional food. Consequently, several literatures are rife with ancient uses of honey as complementary and alternative medicine, with relevance to modern day health care, supported by evidence-based clinical data, with little attention given to honey’s nutritional functions. The moisture contents of honey extracted from University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore honey bee farm was 12.19% while that of natural source was 9.03 ± 1.63%. Similarly, ash and protein contents of farmed honey recorded were 0.37% and 5.22%, respectively. Whereas ash and protein contents of natural honey were 1.70 ± 1.98% and 6.10 ± 0.79%. Likewise fat, dietary fiber and carbohydrates contents of farmed source documented were 0.14%, 1.99% and 62.26% respectively. Although fat, dietary fiber and carbohydrates contents of honey taken from natural resource were 0.54 ± 0.28%, 2.76 ± 1.07% and 55.32 ± 2.91% respectively. Glucose and fructose contents of honey taken out from honeybee farm were 27% and 34% but natural source were 22.50 ± 2.12% and 28.50 ± 3.54%. Glucose and fructose contents of honey taken out from honeybee farm were 27% and 34% but natural source were 22.50 ± 2.12% and 28.50 ± 3.54%. Similarly, sucrose and maltose contents of farmed honey were 2.5% and 12% while in natural honey were 1.35 ± 0.49% and 8.00 ± 1.41% respectively. The present study indicates that such as moisture, carbohydrates, sucrose and maltose contents were higher farmed honey as compared to the natural honey. In our recommendation natural honey is better than farmed honey. |
id |
IIE-1_70b78f44fc709a282bd97d4379af049b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1519-69842023000100153 |
network_acronym_str |
IIE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apisfructosecarbohydratesnatural honeyApis speciessucroseAbstract The medicinal attributes of honey appears to overshadow its importance as a functional food. Consequently, several literatures are rife with ancient uses of honey as complementary and alternative medicine, with relevance to modern day health care, supported by evidence-based clinical data, with little attention given to honey’s nutritional functions. The moisture contents of honey extracted from University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore honey bee farm was 12.19% while that of natural source was 9.03 ± 1.63%. Similarly, ash and protein contents of farmed honey recorded were 0.37% and 5.22%, respectively. Whereas ash and protein contents of natural honey were 1.70 ± 1.98% and 6.10 ± 0.79%. Likewise fat, dietary fiber and carbohydrates contents of farmed source documented were 0.14%, 1.99% and 62.26% respectively. Although fat, dietary fiber and carbohydrates contents of honey taken from natural resource were 0.54 ± 0.28%, 2.76 ± 1.07% and 55.32 ± 2.91% respectively. Glucose and fructose contents of honey taken out from honeybee farm were 27% and 34% but natural source were 22.50 ± 2.12% and 28.50 ± 3.54%. Glucose and fructose contents of honey taken out from honeybee farm were 27% and 34% but natural source were 22.50 ± 2.12% and 28.50 ± 3.54%. Similarly, sucrose and maltose contents of farmed honey were 2.5% and 12% while in natural honey were 1.35 ± 0.49% and 8.00 ± 1.41% respectively. The present study indicates that such as moisture, carbohydrates, sucrose and maltose contents were higher farmed honey as compared to the natural honey. In our recommendation natural honey is better than farmed honey.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842023000100153Brazilian Journal of Biology v.83 2023reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/1519-6984.246651info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMustafa,G.Iqbal,A.Javid,A.Hussain,A.Bukhari,S. M.Ali,W.Saleem,M.Azam,S. M.Sughra,F.Ali,A.Rehman,K. urAndleeb,S.Sadiq,N.Hussain,S. M.Ahmad,A.Ahmad,U.eng2021-08-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842023000100153Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2021-08-06T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
title |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
spellingShingle |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis Mustafa,G. fructose carbohydrates natural honey Apis species sucrose |
title_short |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
title_full |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
title_fullStr |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
title_sort |
Variations in nutritional profile of honey produced by various species of genus Apis |
author |
Mustafa,G. |
author_facet |
Mustafa,G. Iqbal,A. Javid,A. Hussain,A. Bukhari,S. M. Ali,W. Saleem,M. Azam,S. M. Sughra,F. Ali,A. Rehman,K. ur Andleeb,S. Sadiq,N. Hussain,S. M. Ahmad,A. Ahmad,U. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Iqbal,A. Javid,A. Hussain,A. Bukhari,S. M. Ali,W. Saleem,M. Azam,S. M. Sughra,F. Ali,A. Rehman,K. ur Andleeb,S. Sadiq,N. Hussain,S. M. Ahmad,A. Ahmad,U. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mustafa,G. Iqbal,A. Javid,A. Hussain,A. Bukhari,S. M. Ali,W. Saleem,M. Azam,S. M. Sughra,F. Ali,A. Rehman,K. ur Andleeb,S. Sadiq,N. Hussain,S. M. Ahmad,A. Ahmad,U. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
fructose carbohydrates natural honey Apis species sucrose |
topic |
fructose carbohydrates natural honey Apis species sucrose |
description |
Abstract The medicinal attributes of honey appears to overshadow its importance as a functional food. Consequently, several literatures are rife with ancient uses of honey as complementary and alternative medicine, with relevance to modern day health care, supported by evidence-based clinical data, with little attention given to honey’s nutritional functions. The moisture contents of honey extracted from University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore honey bee farm was 12.19% while that of natural source was 9.03 ± 1.63%. Similarly, ash and protein contents of farmed honey recorded were 0.37% and 5.22%, respectively. Whereas ash and protein contents of natural honey were 1.70 ± 1.98% and 6.10 ± 0.79%. Likewise fat, dietary fiber and carbohydrates contents of farmed source documented were 0.14%, 1.99% and 62.26% respectively. Although fat, dietary fiber and carbohydrates contents of honey taken from natural resource were 0.54 ± 0.28%, 2.76 ± 1.07% and 55.32 ± 2.91% respectively. Glucose and fructose contents of honey taken out from honeybee farm were 27% and 34% but natural source were 22.50 ± 2.12% and 28.50 ± 3.54%. Glucose and fructose contents of honey taken out from honeybee farm were 27% and 34% but natural source were 22.50 ± 2.12% and 28.50 ± 3.54%. Similarly, sucrose and maltose contents of farmed honey were 2.5% and 12% while in natural honey were 1.35 ± 0.49% and 8.00 ± 1.41% respectively. The present study indicates that such as moisture, carbohydrates, sucrose and maltose contents were higher farmed honey as compared to the natural honey. In our recommendation natural honey is better than farmed honey. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842023000100153 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842023000100153 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1519-6984.246651 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology v.83 2023 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) instacron:IIE |
instname_str |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
instacron_str |
IIE |
institution |
IIE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br |
_version_ |
1752129889789542400 |