Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira,M. V.
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Grelle,C. E. V., Gentile,R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842004000500021
Resumo: We compared the trappability of marked and unmarked individuals in species of marsupials and rodents of three tropical assemblages of small mammals in Brazil. Two studies used trapping grids, one in cerrado and the other in an Atlantic forest reserve, whereas the study in a rural area used transects. In the two studies using trapping grids, marked animals were frequently more trappable than unmarked ones, but in some species this difference was not significant. In the rural area, marked and unmarked animals did not differ significantly. The number of recaptures per resident animal was higher in the two studies using trapping grids than in the rural area where transects were used. Differences in trappability between the three studies might have been caused by differences not only in trapping design (grids vs. transects), but also in the type of trap used, bait, and habitat. Although differential trappability tends to be considered the rule in small mammals, these results suggest that trappability of marked and unmarked animals may be specific for the particular combination of sampling design, field methods, and habitat under study.
id IIE-1_7f4be037bc689279b8780e1b1ff2d1d6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-69842004000500021
network_acronym_str IIE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository_id_str
spelling Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazilmarsupialsmark-recapturepopulation sizerodentsBrazilWe compared the trappability of marked and unmarked individuals in species of marsupials and rodents of three tropical assemblages of small mammals in Brazil. Two studies used trapping grids, one in cerrado and the other in an Atlantic forest reserve, whereas the study in a rural area used transects. In the two studies using trapping grids, marked animals were frequently more trappable than unmarked ones, but in some species this difference was not significant. In the rural area, marked and unmarked animals did not differ significantly. The number of recaptures per resident animal was higher in the two studies using trapping grids than in the rural area where transects were used. Differences in trappability between the three studies might have been caused by differences not only in trapping design (grids vs. transects), but also in the type of trap used, bait, and habitat. Although differential trappability tends to be considered the rule in small mammals, these results suggest that trappability of marked and unmarked animals may be specific for the particular combination of sampling design, field methods, and habitat under study.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2004-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842004000500021Brazilian Journal of Biology v.64 n.4 2004reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/S1519-69842004000500021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira,M. V.Grelle,C. E. V.Gentile,R.eng2005-11-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842004000500021Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2005-11-07T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
title Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
spellingShingle Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
Vieira,M. V.
marsupials
mark-recapture
population size
rodents
Brazil
title_short Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
title_full Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
title_fullStr Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
title_sort Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Southeastern Brazil
author Vieira,M. V.
author_facet Vieira,M. V.
Grelle,C. E. V.
Gentile,R.
author_role author
author2 Grelle,C. E. V.
Gentile,R.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira,M. V.
Grelle,C. E. V.
Gentile,R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv marsupials
mark-recapture
population size
rodents
Brazil
topic marsupials
mark-recapture
population size
rodents
Brazil
description We compared the trappability of marked and unmarked individuals in species of marsupials and rodents of three tropical assemblages of small mammals in Brazil. Two studies used trapping grids, one in cerrado and the other in an Atlantic forest reserve, whereas the study in a rural area used transects. In the two studies using trapping grids, marked animals were frequently more trappable than unmarked ones, but in some species this difference was not significant. In the rural area, marked and unmarked animals did not differ significantly. The number of recaptures per resident animal was higher in the two studies using trapping grids than in the rural area where transects were used. Differences in trappability between the three studies might have been caused by differences not only in trapping design (grids vs. transects), but also in the type of trap used, bait, and habitat. Although differential trappability tends to be considered the rule in small mammals, these results suggest that trappability of marked and unmarked animals may be specific for the particular combination of sampling design, field methods, and habitat under study.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842004000500021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842004000500021
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1519-69842004000500021
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology v.64 n.4 2004
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
collection Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br
_version_ 1752129875496402944