Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvas Junior,Nelson
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Gomes,Igor Conterato, Valassi,Juliana Martins Ribeiro, Anunciação,Luís, Freitas-Dias,Ricardo de, Koike,Marcia Kiyomi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Einstein (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100219
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the traditional printed form of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire with a proposed online form in terms of validity, reliability, and applicability. Methods: A crossover design study was conducted with 157 undergraduate students. Half of the sample answered the printed questionnaire first and then answered the online questionnaire 7 days later, while the other half of the sample did the inverse. Cronbach's alpha was used to analyze the internal consistency of both the online and printed questionnaires. The construct validity was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, using a weighted least square mean and adjusted variance estimation and oblique rotation. The quality of the model was tested with fit indices. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis showed the 19-item structure with five factors: χ2 of 230.718; degrees of freedom of 142; χ2/degrees of freedom of 1.625; comparative fit index of 0.978 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.073. All items presented factorial loads above 0.5. There was also excellent consistency between the formats of administration in all dimensions, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70. The stability between the formats of administration varied between 0.78 (95%CI: 0.69-0.85) and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.77-0.89), suggesting desirable confidence between both formats of administration. Conclusion: The five-factor model of the online Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire shows internal consistency both in terms of the scale dimensions as well as in terms of the total items.
id IIEPAE-1_1221762afdac7054d363e71ae7a554dc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-45082021000100219
network_acronym_str IIEPAE-1
network_name_str Einstein (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)MotivationMotor activityExerciseInternetOnline systemsSurveys and questionnairesABSTRACT Objective: To compare the traditional printed form of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire with a proposed online form in terms of validity, reliability, and applicability. Methods: A crossover design study was conducted with 157 undergraduate students. Half of the sample answered the printed questionnaire first and then answered the online questionnaire 7 days later, while the other half of the sample did the inverse. Cronbach's alpha was used to analyze the internal consistency of both the online and printed questionnaires. The construct validity was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, using a weighted least square mean and adjusted variance estimation and oblique rotation. The quality of the model was tested with fit indices. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis showed the 19-item structure with five factors: χ2 of 230.718; degrees of freedom of 142; χ2/degrees of freedom of 1.625; comparative fit index of 0.978 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.073. All items presented factorial loads above 0.5. There was also excellent consistency between the formats of administration in all dimensions, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70. The stability between the formats of administration varied between 0.78 (95%CI: 0.69-0.85) and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.77-0.89), suggesting desirable confidence between both formats of administration. Conclusion: The five-factor model of the online Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire shows internal consistency both in terms of the scale dimensions as well as in terms of the total items.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100219einstein (São Paulo) v.19 2021reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ao6088info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvas Junior,NelsonGomes,Igor ConteratoValassi,Juliana Martins RibeiroAnunciação,LuísFreitas-Dias,Ricardo deKoike,Marcia Kiyomieng2021-07-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082021000100219Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2021-07-29T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
title Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
spellingShingle Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
Carvas Junior,Nelson
Motivation
Motor activity
Exercise
Internet
Online systems
Surveys and questionnaires
title_short Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
title_full Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
title_fullStr Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
title_sort Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
author Carvas Junior,Nelson
author_facet Carvas Junior,Nelson
Gomes,Igor Conterato
Valassi,Juliana Martins Ribeiro
Anunciação,Luís
Freitas-Dias,Ricardo de
Koike,Marcia Kiyomi
author_role author
author2 Gomes,Igor Conterato
Valassi,Juliana Martins Ribeiro
Anunciação,Luís
Freitas-Dias,Ricardo de
Koike,Marcia Kiyomi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvas Junior,Nelson
Gomes,Igor Conterato
Valassi,Juliana Martins Ribeiro
Anunciação,Luís
Freitas-Dias,Ricardo de
Koike,Marcia Kiyomi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Motivation
Motor activity
Exercise
Internet
Online systems
Surveys and questionnaires
topic Motivation
Motor activity
Exercise
Internet
Online systems
Surveys and questionnaires
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the traditional printed form of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire with a proposed online form in terms of validity, reliability, and applicability. Methods: A crossover design study was conducted with 157 undergraduate students. Half of the sample answered the printed questionnaire first and then answered the online questionnaire 7 days later, while the other half of the sample did the inverse. Cronbach's alpha was used to analyze the internal consistency of both the online and printed questionnaires. The construct validity was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, using a weighted least square mean and adjusted variance estimation and oblique rotation. The quality of the model was tested with fit indices. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis showed the 19-item structure with five factors: χ2 of 230.718; degrees of freedom of 142; χ2/degrees of freedom of 1.625; comparative fit index of 0.978 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.073. All items presented factorial loads above 0.5. There was also excellent consistency between the formats of administration in all dimensions, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70. The stability between the formats of administration varied between 0.78 (95%CI: 0.69-0.85) and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.77-0.89), suggesting desirable confidence between both formats of administration. Conclusion: The five-factor model of the online Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire shows internal consistency both in terms of the scale dimensions as well as in terms of the total items.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100219
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100219
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ao6088
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv einstein (São Paulo) v.19 2021
reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)
instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron:IIEPAE
instname_str Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron_str IIEPAE
institution IIEPAE
reponame_str Einstein (São Paulo)
collection Einstein (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@einstein.br
_version_ 1752129910559735808