Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Einstein (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective To compare the chest tube drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space with the traditional approach in patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy. Methods We evaluated 40 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective muscle sparing thoracotomies. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients. One group underwent thoracic drainage by the same intercostal space of thoracotomy and the other by traditional chest drainage approach. Results The mean length of hospital stay for the intercostal drainage group in the intensive care unit was 1.5 day (1.0 to 2.0 days) and 2.0 days (25.1 to 3.0 days) for the traditional chest drainage group (p=0.060). The intercostal drainage group had mean length of hospital stay (p=0.527) and drainage (p=0.547) of 4 days, and the traditional chest drainage group and 2 and 5.5 days, respectively. Dipirona and tramadol doses did not differ between groups (p=0.201 and p=0.341). The mean pain scale values on first postoperative was 4.24 in the drainage by the same intercostal group and 3.95 in the traditional chest drainage (p=0.733). In third postoperative day, mean was 3.18 for the first group and 3.11 for the traditional group (p=0.937). In the 15th day after surgery, drainage by the incision was 1.53 and the traditional chest drainage was 2.11 (p=0.440), 30th days after drainage by incision was 0.71 and traditional chest drainage was 0.84 (p=0.787). Complications, for both groups were similar with 30% in proposed drainage and 25% in traditional approach (p=0.723). Conclusion Drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space was feasible and results 30 days after surgery were not inferior to those of the traditional chest drainage approach. |
id |
IIEPAE-1_66043be20a735d2afbe6aa4b4ddaa005 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100203 |
network_acronym_str |
IIEPAE-1 |
network_name_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized studyDrainageThoracotomyThoracic surgeryPainABSTRACT Objective To compare the chest tube drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space with the traditional approach in patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy. Methods We evaluated 40 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective muscle sparing thoracotomies. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients. One group underwent thoracic drainage by the same intercostal space of thoracotomy and the other by traditional chest drainage approach. Results The mean length of hospital stay for the intercostal drainage group in the intensive care unit was 1.5 day (1.0 to 2.0 days) and 2.0 days (25.1 to 3.0 days) for the traditional chest drainage group (p=0.060). The intercostal drainage group had mean length of hospital stay (p=0.527) and drainage (p=0.547) of 4 days, and the traditional chest drainage group and 2 and 5.5 days, respectively. Dipirona and tramadol doses did not differ between groups (p=0.201 and p=0.341). The mean pain scale values on first postoperative was 4.24 in the drainage by the same intercostal group and 3.95 in the traditional chest drainage (p=0.733). In third postoperative day, mean was 3.18 for the first group and 3.11 for the traditional group (p=0.937). In the 15th day after surgery, drainage by the incision was 1.53 and the traditional chest drainage was 2.11 (p=0.440), 30th days after drainage by incision was 0.71 and traditional chest drainage was 0.84 (p=0.787). Complications, for both groups were similar with 30% in proposed drainage and 25% in traditional approach (p=0.723). Conclusion Drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space was feasible and results 30 days after surgery were not inferior to those of the traditional chest drainage approach.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203einstein (São Paulo) v.18 2020reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao4409info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBachichi,Thiago GangiLeão,Luiz Eduardo VillaçaPerfeito,João Alessio JulianoMiotto,AndreHolanda,Caio SantosCosta Jr,Altair da Silvaeng2019-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100203Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2019-10-08T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
title |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
spellingShingle |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study Bachichi,Thiago Gangi Drainage Thoracotomy Thoracic surgery Pain |
title_short |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
title_full |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
title_fullStr |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
title_sort |
Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study |
author |
Bachichi,Thiago Gangi |
author_facet |
Bachichi,Thiago Gangi Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano Miotto,Andre Holanda,Caio Santos Costa Jr,Altair da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano Miotto,Andre Holanda,Caio Santos Costa Jr,Altair da Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bachichi,Thiago Gangi Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano Miotto,Andre Holanda,Caio Santos Costa Jr,Altair da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Drainage Thoracotomy Thoracic surgery Pain |
topic |
Drainage Thoracotomy Thoracic surgery Pain |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective To compare the chest tube drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space with the traditional approach in patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy. Methods We evaluated 40 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective muscle sparing thoracotomies. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients. One group underwent thoracic drainage by the same intercostal space of thoracotomy and the other by traditional chest drainage approach. Results The mean length of hospital stay for the intercostal drainage group in the intensive care unit was 1.5 day (1.0 to 2.0 days) and 2.0 days (25.1 to 3.0 days) for the traditional chest drainage group (p=0.060). The intercostal drainage group had mean length of hospital stay (p=0.527) and drainage (p=0.547) of 4 days, and the traditional chest drainage group and 2 and 5.5 days, respectively. Dipirona and tramadol doses did not differ between groups (p=0.201 and p=0.341). The mean pain scale values on first postoperative was 4.24 in the drainage by the same intercostal group and 3.95 in the traditional chest drainage (p=0.733). In third postoperative day, mean was 3.18 for the first group and 3.11 for the traditional group (p=0.937). In the 15th day after surgery, drainage by the incision was 1.53 and the traditional chest drainage was 2.11 (p=0.440), 30th days after drainage by incision was 0.71 and traditional chest drainage was 0.84 (p=0.787). Complications, for both groups were similar with 30% in proposed drainage and 25% in traditional approach (p=0.723). Conclusion Drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space was feasible and results 30 days after surgery were not inferior to those of the traditional chest drainage approach. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao4409 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
einstein (São Paulo) v.18 2020 reponame:Einstein (São Paulo) instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) instacron:IIEPAE |
instname_str |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
instacron_str |
IIEPAE |
institution |
IIEPAE |
reponame_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
collection |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@einstein.br |
_version_ |
1752129909991407616 |