Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bachichi,Thiago Gangi
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça, Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano, Miotto,Andre, Holanda,Caio Santos, Costa Jr,Altair da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Einstein (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective To compare the chest tube drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space with the traditional approach in patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy. Methods We evaluated 40 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective muscle sparing thoracotomies. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients. One group underwent thoracic drainage by the same intercostal space of thoracotomy and the other by traditional chest drainage approach. Results The mean length of hospital stay for the intercostal drainage group in the intensive care unit was 1.5 day (1.0 to 2.0 days) and 2.0 days (25.1 to 3.0 days) for the traditional chest drainage group (p=0.060). The intercostal drainage group had mean length of hospital stay (p=0.527) and drainage (p=0.547) of 4 days, and the traditional chest drainage group and 2 and 5.5 days, respectively. Dipirona and tramadol doses did not differ between groups (p=0.201 and p=0.341). The mean pain scale values on first postoperative was 4.24 in the drainage by the same intercostal group and 3.95 in the traditional chest drainage (p=0.733). In third postoperative day, mean was 3.18 for the first group and 3.11 for the traditional group (p=0.937). In the 15th day after surgery, drainage by the incision was 1.53 and the traditional chest drainage was 2.11 (p=0.440), 30th days after drainage by incision was 0.71 and traditional chest drainage was 0.84 (p=0.787). Complications, for both groups were similar with 30% in proposed drainage and 25% in traditional approach (p=0.723). Conclusion Drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space was feasible and results 30 days after surgery were not inferior to those of the traditional chest drainage approach.
id IIEPAE-1_66043be20a735d2afbe6aa4b4ddaa005
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100203
network_acronym_str IIEPAE-1
network_name_str Einstein (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized studyDrainageThoracotomyThoracic surgeryPainABSTRACT Objective To compare the chest tube drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space with the traditional approach in patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy. Methods We evaluated 40 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective muscle sparing thoracotomies. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients. One group underwent thoracic drainage by the same intercostal space of thoracotomy and the other by traditional chest drainage approach. Results The mean length of hospital stay for the intercostal drainage group in the intensive care unit was 1.5 day (1.0 to 2.0 days) and 2.0 days (25.1 to 3.0 days) for the traditional chest drainage group (p=0.060). The intercostal drainage group had mean length of hospital stay (p=0.527) and drainage (p=0.547) of 4 days, and the traditional chest drainage group and 2 and 5.5 days, respectively. Dipirona and tramadol doses did not differ between groups (p=0.201 and p=0.341). The mean pain scale values on first postoperative was 4.24 in the drainage by the same intercostal group and 3.95 in the traditional chest drainage (p=0.733). In third postoperative day, mean was 3.18 for the first group and 3.11 for the traditional group (p=0.937). In the 15th day after surgery, drainage by the incision was 1.53 and the traditional chest drainage was 2.11 (p=0.440), 30th days after drainage by incision was 0.71 and traditional chest drainage was 0.84 (p=0.787). Complications, for both groups were similar with 30% in proposed drainage and 25% in traditional approach (p=0.723). Conclusion Drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space was feasible and results 30 days after surgery were not inferior to those of the traditional chest drainage approach.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203einstein (São Paulo) v.18 2020reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao4409info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBachichi,Thiago GangiLeão,Luiz Eduardo VillaçaPerfeito,João Alessio JulianoMiotto,AndreHolanda,Caio SantosCosta Jr,Altair da Silvaeng2019-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100203Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2019-10-08T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
title Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
spellingShingle Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
Bachichi,Thiago Gangi
Drainage
Thoracotomy
Thoracic surgery
Pain
title_short Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
title_full Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
title_sort Traditional chest drainage versus drainage by thoracotomy: a prospective randomized study
author Bachichi,Thiago Gangi
author_facet Bachichi,Thiago Gangi
Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça
Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano
Miotto,Andre
Holanda,Caio Santos
Costa Jr,Altair da Silva
author_role author
author2 Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça
Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano
Miotto,Andre
Holanda,Caio Santos
Costa Jr,Altair da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bachichi,Thiago Gangi
Leão,Luiz Eduardo Villaça
Perfeito,João Alessio Juliano
Miotto,Andre
Holanda,Caio Santos
Costa Jr,Altair da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Drainage
Thoracotomy
Thoracic surgery
Pain
topic Drainage
Thoracotomy
Thoracic surgery
Pain
description ABSTRACT Objective To compare the chest tube drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space with the traditional approach in patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy. Methods We evaluated 40 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective muscle sparing thoracotomies. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients. One group underwent thoracic drainage by the same intercostal space of thoracotomy and the other by traditional chest drainage approach. Results The mean length of hospital stay for the intercostal drainage group in the intensive care unit was 1.5 day (1.0 to 2.0 days) and 2.0 days (25.1 to 3.0 days) for the traditional chest drainage group (p=0.060). The intercostal drainage group had mean length of hospital stay (p=0.527) and drainage (p=0.547) of 4 days, and the traditional chest drainage group and 2 and 5.5 days, respectively. Dipirona and tramadol doses did not differ between groups (p=0.201 and p=0.341). The mean pain scale values on first postoperative was 4.24 in the drainage by the same intercostal group and 3.95 in the traditional chest drainage (p=0.733). In third postoperative day, mean was 3.18 for the first group and 3.11 for the traditional group (p=0.937). In the 15th day after surgery, drainage by the incision was 1.53 and the traditional chest drainage was 2.11 (p=0.440), 30th days after drainage by incision was 0.71 and traditional chest drainage was 0.84 (p=0.787). Complications, for both groups were similar with 30% in proposed drainage and 25% in traditional approach (p=0.723). Conclusion Drainage by the same thoracotomy intercostal space was feasible and results 30 days after surgery were not inferior to those of the traditional chest drainage approach.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao4409
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv einstein (São Paulo) v.18 2020
reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)
instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron:IIEPAE
instname_str Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron_str IIEPAE
institution IIEPAE
reponame_str Einstein (São Paulo)
collection Einstein (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@einstein.br
_version_ 1752129909991407616