Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Einstein (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082017000300295 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective To determine the current clinical practice in Latin America for treating midshaft clavicle fractures, including surgical and non-surgical approaches. Methods A cross-sectional study using a descriptive questionnaire. Shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and from the Latin American Society of Shoulder and Elbow were contacted and asked to complete a short questionnaire (SurveyMonkey®) on the management of midshaft fractures of the clavicle. Incomplete or inconsistent answers were excluded. Results The type of radiographic classification preferably used was related to description of fracture morphology, according to 41% of participants. Allman classification ranked second and was used by 24.1% of participants. As to indications for surgical treatment, only the indications with shortening and imminence of skin exposure were statistically significant. Conservative treatment was chosen in cortical contact. Regarding immobilization method, the simple sling was preferred, and treatment lasted from 4 to 6 weeks. Although the result was not statistically significant, the blocked plate was the preferred option in surgical cases. Conclusion The treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in Latin America is in accordance with the current literature. |
id |
IIEPAE-1_c78182cd8b12c6b2b778197f2135a4e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-45082017000300295 |
network_acronym_str |
IIEPAE-1 |
network_name_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adultsFractures bone/surgeryFractures, bone/therapyClavicle/injuriesClavicle/surgerySurveys and questionnairesABSTRACT Objective To determine the current clinical practice in Latin America for treating midshaft clavicle fractures, including surgical and non-surgical approaches. Methods A cross-sectional study using a descriptive questionnaire. Shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and from the Latin American Society of Shoulder and Elbow were contacted and asked to complete a short questionnaire (SurveyMonkey®) on the management of midshaft fractures of the clavicle. Incomplete or inconsistent answers were excluded. Results The type of radiographic classification preferably used was related to description of fracture morphology, according to 41% of participants. Allman classification ranked second and was used by 24.1% of participants. As to indications for surgical treatment, only the indications with shortening and imminence of skin exposure were statistically significant. Conservative treatment was chosen in cortical contact. Regarding immobilization method, the simple sling was preferred, and treatment lasted from 4 to 6 weeks. Although the result was not statistically significant, the blocked plate was the preferred option in surgical cases. Conclusion The treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in Latin America is in accordance with the current literature.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082017000300295einstein (São Paulo) v.15 n.3 2017reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.1590/s1679-45082017ao4043info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira Junior,Adilson Sanches deRoberto,Bruno BragaLenza,MarioPintan,Guilherme FigueiredoEjnisman,BennoSchor,BrenoCarrera,Eduardo da FrotaMurachovsky,Joeleng2017-10-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082017000300295Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2017-10-26T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
title |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
spellingShingle |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults Oliveira Junior,Adilson Sanches de Fractures bone/surgery Fractures, bone/therapy Clavicle/injuries Clavicle/surgery Surveys and questionnaires |
title_short |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
title_full |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
title_fullStr |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
title_sort |
Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults |
author |
Oliveira Junior,Adilson Sanches de |
author_facet |
Oliveira Junior,Adilson Sanches de Roberto,Bruno Braga Lenza,Mario Pintan,Guilherme Figueiredo Ejnisman,Benno Schor,Breno Carrera,Eduardo da Frota Murachovsky,Joel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Roberto,Bruno Braga Lenza,Mario Pintan,Guilherme Figueiredo Ejnisman,Benno Schor,Breno Carrera,Eduardo da Frota Murachovsky,Joel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira Junior,Adilson Sanches de Roberto,Bruno Braga Lenza,Mario Pintan,Guilherme Figueiredo Ejnisman,Benno Schor,Breno Carrera,Eduardo da Frota Murachovsky,Joel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fractures bone/surgery Fractures, bone/therapy Clavicle/injuries Clavicle/surgery Surveys and questionnaires |
topic |
Fractures bone/surgery Fractures, bone/therapy Clavicle/injuries Clavicle/surgery Surveys and questionnaires |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective To determine the current clinical practice in Latin America for treating midshaft clavicle fractures, including surgical and non-surgical approaches. Methods A cross-sectional study using a descriptive questionnaire. Shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and from the Latin American Society of Shoulder and Elbow were contacted and asked to complete a short questionnaire (SurveyMonkey®) on the management of midshaft fractures of the clavicle. Incomplete or inconsistent answers were excluded. Results The type of radiographic classification preferably used was related to description of fracture morphology, according to 41% of participants. Allman classification ranked second and was used by 24.1% of participants. As to indications for surgical treatment, only the indications with shortening and imminence of skin exposure were statistically significant. Conservative treatment was chosen in cortical contact. Regarding immobilization method, the simple sling was preferred, and treatment lasted from 4 to 6 weeks. Although the result was not statistically significant, the blocked plate was the preferred option in surgical cases. Conclusion The treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in Latin America is in accordance with the current literature. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082017000300295 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082017000300295 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1679-45082017ao4043 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
einstein (São Paulo) v.15 n.3 2017 reponame:Einstein (São Paulo) instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) instacron:IIEPAE |
instname_str |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
instacron_str |
IIEPAE |
institution |
IIEPAE |
reponame_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
collection |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@einstein.br |
_version_ |
1752129908817002496 |