Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Independent Journal of Management & Production |
Texto Completo: | http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406 |
Resumo: | The study presents economic substantiation of applying environmentally friendly plant growth stimulators in combination with biological fungicides in sunflower production under conditions of the South of Ukraine. The field research was conducted at Kherson State Agricultural University (Ukraine) in 2017 – 2019 under conditions of dark chestnut alkaline soils with the humus content of 2.5% in the plough layer. The results of the three-year field research prove that the net profit reached the absolute maximum in the variant of the hybrid LG 5580 under conditions of applying the bio-fungicide Fitotsyd-r with the stimulator Ahrostymulin at the stage of budding and amounted to $1081/ha. In this case the cost price was the least – $141.6/ha, and the profitability level was the highest – 196%. In the areas sown with the hybrid Tunca the variant with the combination of Fitotsyd-r and the growth stimulator Ahrostymulin also provided a positive result, but it yielded a little to the combination of the preparations Fitosporyn / Ahrostymulin: the net profit was $579.7/ha, the price cost made $203.4/ha and the profitability was 106 %.On the whole this analysis makes it possible to maintain that additional costs related to purchasing and applying fertlizers are totally compensated owing to the cost of an increase in the yield. |
id |
IJMP_1e3d443bff4eacdc19fbf0d6cad3c329 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/1406 |
network_acronym_str |
IJMP |
network_name_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflowerenvironmentallyfriendlyfertilizerssunflowerproductioncostsproductnet profitprofitabilityThe study presents economic substantiation of applying environmentally friendly plant growth stimulators in combination with biological fungicides in sunflower production under conditions of the South of Ukraine. The field research was conducted at Kherson State Agricultural University (Ukraine) in 2017 – 2019 under conditions of dark chestnut alkaline soils with the humus content of 2.5% in the plough layer. The results of the three-year field research prove that the net profit reached the absolute maximum in the variant of the hybrid LG 5580 under conditions of applying the bio-fungicide Fitotsyd-r with the stimulator Ahrostymulin at the stage of budding and amounted to $1081/ha. In this case the cost price was the least – $141.6/ha, and the profitability level was the highest – 196%. In the areas sown with the hybrid Tunca the variant with the combination of Fitotsyd-r and the growth stimulator Ahrostymulin also provided a positive result, but it yielded a little to the combination of the preparations Fitosporyn / Ahrostymulin: the net profit was $579.7/ha, the price cost made $203.4/ha and the profitability was 106 %.On the whole this analysis makes it possible to maintain that additional costs related to purchasing and applying fertlizers are totally compensated owing to the cost of an increase in the yield.Independent2020-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 11 No. 9 (2020): Independent Journal of Management & Production (2nd Special Edition ISE, S&P); 2171-21842236-269X2236-269Xreponame:Independent Journal of Management & Productioninstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)instacron:IJM&Penghttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406/1661http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406/1662Copyright (c) 2020 Yevhenii Domaratskyi, Anastasia Kaplina, Olga Kozlova, Nonna Koval, Andrii Dobrovolskyiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDomaratskyi, YevheniiKaplina, AnastasiaKozlova, OlgaKoval, NonnaDobrovolskyi, Andrii2020-11-01T04:11:00Zoai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/1406Revistahttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/PUBhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/oaiijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br||2236-269X2236-269Xopendoar:2020-11-01T04:11Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
title |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
spellingShingle |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower Domaratskyi, Yevhenii environmentally friendly fertilizers sunflower production costs product net profit profitability |
title_short |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
title_full |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
title_fullStr |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
title_sort |
Economic justification for the use of biological fungicides and plant growth stimulants for growing sunflower |
author |
Domaratskyi, Yevhenii |
author_facet |
Domaratskyi, Yevhenii Kaplina, Anastasia Kozlova, Olga Koval, Nonna Dobrovolskyi, Andrii |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kaplina, Anastasia Kozlova, Olga Koval, Nonna Dobrovolskyi, Andrii |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Domaratskyi, Yevhenii Kaplina, Anastasia Kozlova, Olga Koval, Nonna Dobrovolskyi, Andrii |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
environmentally friendly fertilizers sunflower production costs product net profit profitability |
topic |
environmentally friendly fertilizers sunflower production costs product net profit profitability |
description |
The study presents economic substantiation of applying environmentally friendly plant growth stimulators in combination with biological fungicides in sunflower production under conditions of the South of Ukraine. The field research was conducted at Kherson State Agricultural University (Ukraine) in 2017 – 2019 under conditions of dark chestnut alkaline soils with the humus content of 2.5% in the plough layer. The results of the three-year field research prove that the net profit reached the absolute maximum in the variant of the hybrid LG 5580 under conditions of applying the bio-fungicide Fitotsyd-r with the stimulator Ahrostymulin at the stage of budding and amounted to $1081/ha. In this case the cost price was the least – $141.6/ha, and the profitability level was the highest – 196%. In the areas sown with the hybrid Tunca the variant with the combination of Fitotsyd-r and the growth stimulator Ahrostymulin also provided a positive result, but it yielded a little to the combination of the preparations Fitosporyn / Ahrostymulin: the net profit was $579.7/ha, the price cost made $203.4/ha and the profitability was 106 %.On the whole this analysis makes it possible to maintain that additional costs related to purchasing and applying fertlizers are totally compensated owing to the cost of an increase in the yield. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406 |
url |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406/1661 http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1406/1662 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 11 No. 9 (2020): Independent Journal of Management & Production (2nd Special Edition ISE, S&P); 2171-2184 2236-269X 2236-269X reponame:Independent Journal of Management & Production instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) instacron:IJM&P |
instname_str |
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
instacron_str |
IJM&P |
institution |
IJM&P |
reponame_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
collection |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br|| |
_version_ |
1797220493507428352 |