Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Independent Journal of Management & Production |
Texto Completo: | http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637 |
Resumo: | The economy, culture, and social development of countries in the 21st century are directly related to the quality of education. For education to have expected quality and deliver the desired values to their client, many educational institutions are applying Lean management. Therefore, the paper aimed to explore the Lean implementation in education through a systematic review of papers from the past five years, in English and the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The methodology was developed using the PRISMA protocol and has been according to the type of approach, place of analysis, tools, facilitators, barriers, positive results, negative results, and the tendency of future work. The main results found were that 69.57% of the papers are analytical, LSS is the most discussed tool, the reduction is the main facilitator, the lack of Lean knowledge is the main barrier, and the attendance to the student obtained the best positive result. |
id |
IJMP_999e8e24fd42c00b514bf45d66f80e60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/1637 |
network_acronym_str |
IJMP |
network_name_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutionsEducationLeanSystematic reviewPrismaThe economy, culture, and social development of countries in the 21st century are directly related to the quality of education. For education to have expected quality and deliver the desired values to their client, many educational institutions are applying Lean management. Therefore, the paper aimed to explore the Lean implementation in education through a systematic review of papers from the past five years, in English and the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The methodology was developed using the PRISMA protocol and has been according to the type of approach, place of analysis, tools, facilitators, barriers, positive results, negative results, and the tendency of future work. The main results found were that 69.57% of the papers are analytical, LSS is the most discussed tool, the reduction is the main facilitator, the lack of Lean knowledge is the main barrier, and the attendance to the student obtained the best positive result.Independent2021-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/163710.14807/ijmp.v12i9.1637Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 12 No. 9 (2021): Independent Journal of Management & Production (Special Edition IFLOG); s865-s8822236-269X2236-269Xreponame:Independent Journal of Management & Productioninstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)instacron:IJM&Penghttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637/2068http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637/2069Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Eduarda Alves da Silva , Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Santos, Augusto da Cunha Reis, Genildo Nonato Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Maria Eduarda Alves daSantos, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dosReis, Augusto da CunhaSantos, Genildo Nonato2021-12-21T11:59:38Zoai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/1637Revistahttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/PUBhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/oaiijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br||2236-269X2236-269Xopendoar:2021-12-21T11:59:38Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
title |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
spellingShingle |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions Silva, Maria Eduarda Alves da Education Lean Systematic review Prisma |
title_short |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
title_full |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
title_fullStr |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
title_sort |
Systematic review of lean thinking in education institutions |
author |
Silva, Maria Eduarda Alves da |
author_facet |
Silva, Maria Eduarda Alves da Santos, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Reis, Augusto da Cunha Santos, Genildo Nonato |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Reis, Augusto da Cunha Santos, Genildo Nonato |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Maria Eduarda Alves da Santos, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Reis, Augusto da Cunha Santos, Genildo Nonato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Education Lean Systematic review Prisma |
topic |
Education Lean Systematic review Prisma |
description |
The economy, culture, and social development of countries in the 21st century are directly related to the quality of education. For education to have expected quality and deliver the desired values to their client, many educational institutions are applying Lean management. Therefore, the paper aimed to explore the Lean implementation in education through a systematic review of papers from the past five years, in English and the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The methodology was developed using the PRISMA protocol and has been according to the type of approach, place of analysis, tools, facilitators, barriers, positive results, negative results, and the tendency of future work. The main results found were that 69.57% of the papers are analytical, LSS is the most discussed tool, the reduction is the main facilitator, the lack of Lean knowledge is the main barrier, and the attendance to the student obtained the best positive result. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637 10.14807/ijmp.v12i9.1637 |
url |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14807/ijmp.v12i9.1637 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637/2068 http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1637/2069 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 12 No. 9 (2021): Independent Journal of Management & Production (Special Edition IFLOG); s865-s882 2236-269X 2236-269X reponame:Independent Journal of Management & Production instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) instacron:IJM&P |
instname_str |
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
instacron_str |
IJM&P |
institution |
IJM&P |
reponame_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
collection |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br|| |
_version_ |
1797220494062125056 |