Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210 |
Resumo: | The present article aims to compare the theories of justice proposed by Friedrich Hayek and John Rawls, attempting to analyze Hayek´s curious assertion that the difference between authors would be more on terminology than content. To do this, it will verify indirect bibliographic documentation as a way of understanding the convergences and divergences between the authors, tracing the general concepts of both theories and aiming at the ideological parallels of both authors. The article concludes that the authors, although liberals who have relied on similar sources in their formation, arrive at completely different conclusions in their theories of justice, which is explained by diverse conceptual notions and theoretical endsbetween the authors, despite several methodological convergences that motivated Hayek’s assertion in the first place. |
id |
IMB-1_074ee12eca120a661801ee324f7bb1de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1210 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminologyLas teorías de la justicia de Hayek y Rawls: divergencias y convergencias más allá de la mera terminología As teorias da justiça de Hayek e Rawls: divergências e convergências além da mera terminologiaJustiça socialFriedrich HayekJohn Rawlsteoria da justiçajustiça como equidade.Social justiceFriedrich HayekJohn Rawlstheory of justicejustice as fairnessJusticia socialFriedrich HayekJohn Rawlsteoría de la justiciajusticia como equidadThe present article aims to compare the theories of justice proposed by Friedrich Hayek and John Rawls, attempting to analyze Hayek´s curious assertion that the difference between authors would be more on terminology than content. To do this, it will verify indirect bibliographic documentation as a way of understanding the convergences and divergences between the authors, tracing the general concepts of both theories and aiming at the ideological parallels of both authors. The article concludes that the authors, although liberals who have relied on similar sources in their formation, arrive at completely different conclusions in their theories of justice, which is explained by diverse conceptual notions and theoretical endsbetween the authors, despite several methodological convergences that motivated Hayek’s assertion in the first place.El presente artículo tiene como objetivo comparar las teorías de la justicia propuestas por Friedrich Hayek y John Rawls, intentando observar la curiosa frase de Hayek que dice que la diferencia entre los autores serían más terminológicas que sobre contenido. Para esto, se rescatará documentación indirecta bibliográfica como una forma de entender las convergencias y divergencias entre los autores, trayendo los conceptos generales de ambas teorías y examinando los paralelos ideológicos de ambos autores. Se concluye con la investigación realizada que los autores a pesar de liberales se basaron en fuentes semejantes en su formación, que llegan a conclusiones completamente diversas en sus teorías de la justicia, lo que se da por nociones conceptuales y fines teóricos diversos entre Hayek y Rawls, a pesar de diversas convergencias metodológicas que motivaron la frase de Hayek en un primer momento.O presente artigo objetiva comparar as teorias da justiça propostas por Friedrich Hayek e John Rawls, intentando observar a curiosa frase de Hayek que diz que a diferença entre os autores seria mais terminológica do que sobre conteúdo. Para isso, será resgatada documentação indireta bibliográfica como forma de entender as convergências e divergências entre os autores, traçando os conceitos gerais de ambas as teorias e visando os paralelos ideológicos de ambos os autores. Conclui-se com a pesquisa realizada que os autores, apesar de liberais que se basearam em fontes semelhantes em sua formação, chegam à conclusões completamente diversas em suas teorias da justiça, o que se dá por noções conceituais e finsteóricos diversos entre Hayek e Rawls, apesar de diversas convergências metodológicas que motivaram a frase de Hayek em um primeiro momento.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/121010.30800/mises.2019.v7.1210MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210/640de Quadros, Matheusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-07T16:54:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1210Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2020-04-07T16:54:48Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology Las teorías de la justicia de Hayek y Rawls: divergencias y convergencias más allá de la mera terminología As teorias da justiça de Hayek e Rawls: divergências e convergências além da mera terminologia |
title |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology |
spellingShingle |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology de Quadros, Matheus Justiça social Friedrich Hayek John Rawls teoria da justiça justiça como equidade. Social justice Friedrich Hayek John Rawls theory of justice justice as fairness Justicia social Friedrich Hayek John Rawls teoría de la justicia justicia como equidad |
title_short |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology |
title_full |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology |
title_fullStr |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology |
title_sort |
Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology |
author |
de Quadros, Matheus |
author_facet |
de Quadros, Matheus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Quadros, Matheus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Justiça social Friedrich Hayek John Rawls teoria da justiça justiça como equidade. Social justice Friedrich Hayek John Rawls theory of justice justice as fairness Justicia social Friedrich Hayek John Rawls teoría de la justicia justicia como equidad |
topic |
Justiça social Friedrich Hayek John Rawls teoria da justiça justiça como equidade. Social justice Friedrich Hayek John Rawls theory of justice justice as fairness Justicia social Friedrich Hayek John Rawls teoría de la justicia justicia como equidad |
description |
The present article aims to compare the theories of justice proposed by Friedrich Hayek and John Rawls, attempting to analyze Hayek´s curious assertion that the difference between authors would be more on terminology than content. To do this, it will verify indirect bibliographic documentation as a way of understanding the convergences and divergences between the authors, tracing the general concepts of both theories and aiming at the ideological parallels of both authors. The article concludes that the authors, although liberals who have relied on similar sources in their formation, arrive at completely different conclusions in their theories of justice, which is explained by diverse conceptual notions and theoretical endsbetween the authors, despite several methodological convergences that motivated Hayek’s assertion in the first place. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1210 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1210 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210/640 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago) 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181902274560 |