Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Quadros, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210
Resumo: The present article aims to compare the theories of justice proposed by Friedrich Hayek and John Rawls, attempting to analyze Hayek´s curious assertion that the difference between authors would be more on terminology than content. To do this, it will verify indirect bibliographic documentation as a way of understanding the convergences and divergences between the authors, tracing the general concepts of both theories and aiming at the ideological parallels of both authors. The article concludes that the authors, although liberals who have relied on similar sources in their formation, arrive at completely different conclusions in their theories of justice, which is explained by diverse conceptual notions and theoretical endsbetween the authors, despite several methodological convergences that motivated Hayek’s assertion in the first place.
id IMB-1_074ee12eca120a661801ee324f7bb1de
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1210
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminologyLas teorías de la justicia de Hayek y Rawls: divergencias y convergencias más allá de la mera terminología As teorias da justiça de Hayek e Rawls: divergências e convergências além da mera terminologiaJustiça socialFriedrich HayekJohn Rawlsteoria da justiçajustiça como equidade.Social justiceFriedrich HayekJohn Rawlstheory of justicejustice as fairnessJusticia socialFriedrich HayekJohn Rawlsteoría de la justiciajusticia como equidadThe present article aims to compare the theories of justice proposed by Friedrich Hayek and John Rawls, attempting to analyze Hayek´s curious assertion that the difference between authors would be more on terminology than content. To do this, it will verify indirect bibliographic documentation as a way of understanding the convergences and divergences between the authors, tracing the general concepts of both theories and aiming at the ideological parallels of both authors. The article concludes that the authors, although liberals who have relied on similar sources in their formation, arrive at completely different conclusions in their theories of justice, which is explained by diverse conceptual notions and theoretical endsbetween the authors, despite several methodological convergences that motivated Hayek’s assertion in the first place.El presente artículo tiene como objetivo comparar las teorías de la justicia propuestas por Friedrich Hayek y John Rawls, intentando observar la curiosa frase de Hayek que dice que la diferencia entre los autores serían más terminológicas que sobre contenido. Para esto, se rescatará documentación indirecta bibliográfica como una forma de entender las convergencias y divergencias entre los autores, trayendo los conceptos generales de ambas teorías y examinando los paralelos ideológicos de ambos autores. Se concluye con la investigación realizada que los autores a pesar de liberales se basaron en fuentes semejantes en su formación, que llegan a conclusiones completamente diversas en sus teorías de la justicia, lo que se da por nociones conceptuales y fines teóricos diversos entre Hayek y Rawls, a pesar de diversas convergencias metodológicas que motivaron la frase de Hayek en un primer momento.O presente artigo objetiva comparar as teorias da justiça propostas por Friedrich Hayek e John Rawls, intentando observar a curiosa frase de Hayek que diz que a diferença entre os autores seria mais terminológica do que sobre conteúdo. Para isso, será resgatada documentação indireta bibliográfica como forma de entender as convergências e divergências entre os autores, traçando os conceitos gerais de ambas as teorias e visando os paralelos ideológicos de ambos os autores. Conclui-se com a pesquisa realizada que os autores, apesar de liberais que se basearam em fontes semelhantes em sua formação, chegam à conclusões completamente diversas em suas teorias da justiça, o que se dá por noções conceituais e finsteóricos diversos entre Hayek e Rawls, apesar de diversas convergências metodológicas que motivaram a frase de Hayek em um primeiro momento.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/121010.30800/mises.2019.v7.1210MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210/640de Quadros, Matheusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-07T16:54:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1210Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2020-04-07T16:54:48Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
Las teorías de la justicia de Hayek y Rawls: divergencias y convergencias más allá de la mera terminología
As teorias da justiça de Hayek e Rawls: divergências e convergências além da mera terminologia
title Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
spellingShingle Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
de Quadros, Matheus
Justiça social
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
teoria da justiça
justiça como equidade.
Social justice
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
theory of justice
justice as fairness
Justicia social
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
teoría de la justicia
justicia como equidad
title_short Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
title_full Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
title_fullStr Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
title_full_unstemmed Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
title_sort Hayek and Rawls’s theories of justice: divergences and convergences beyond mere terminology
author de Quadros, Matheus
author_facet de Quadros, Matheus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Quadros, Matheus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Justiça social
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
teoria da justiça
justiça como equidade.
Social justice
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
theory of justice
justice as fairness
Justicia social
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
teoría de la justicia
justicia como equidad
topic Justiça social
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
teoria da justiça
justiça como equidade.
Social justice
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
theory of justice
justice as fairness
Justicia social
Friedrich Hayek
John Rawls
teoría de la justicia
justicia como equidad
description The present article aims to compare the theories of justice proposed by Friedrich Hayek and John Rawls, attempting to analyze Hayek´s curious assertion that the difference between authors would be more on terminology than content. To do this, it will verify indirect bibliographic documentation as a way of understanding the convergences and divergences between the authors, tracing the general concepts of both theories and aiming at the ideological parallels of both authors. The article concludes that the authors, although liberals who have relied on similar sources in their formation, arrive at completely different conclusions in their theories of justice, which is explained by diverse conceptual notions and theoretical endsbetween the authors, despite several methodological convergences that motivated Hayek’s assertion in the first place.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1210
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1210/640
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313181902274560