Reflections on Legal Polycentrism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casey, Gerard
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/599
Resumo: The author argues that one of the factors that allow governments to perform acts that deprive citizens of their freedoms is the sense of legitimacy of these acts, accepted by the public. The average citizen believes that the government is their rightful sovereign, and it would be wrong to refuse to obey their commands. This sense of legitimacy – that is a myth for the author – was nurtured by State intellectuals over time. The important rhetorical argument of historical examples of anarchist societies that worked and contemporary evidence of lawless elements operatively in state societies show that was not always so, it is not so in all places and in all respects, even now, and that does not it must be so. Casey illustrates his argument in favor of anarchic societies with the example of the ancient Irish society, until the seventeenth century, and shows their similarities with Tom Bell’s legal polycentrism. Finally, he discusses restorative justice.
id IMB-1_449e9f7ab15887b98c37c93d59474ad1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/599
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling Reflections on Legal PolycentrismReflexões sobre o Policentrismo JurídicoLibertarianismoPolicentrismo JurídicoEstadoSociedade IrlandesaPropriedade PrivadaJustiça RestaurativaLibertarianismLegal PolycentrismStateIrish SocietyPrivate PropertyRestorative JusticeThe author argues that one of the factors that allow governments to perform acts that deprive citizens of their freedoms is the sense of legitimacy of these acts, accepted by the public. The average citizen believes that the government is their rightful sovereign, and it would be wrong to refuse to obey their commands. This sense of legitimacy – that is a myth for the author – was nurtured by State intellectuals over time. The important rhetorical argument of historical examples of anarchist societies that worked and contemporary evidence of lawless elements operatively in state societies show that was not always so, it is not so in all places and in all respects, even now, and that does not it must be so. Casey illustrates his argument in favor of anarchic societies with the example of the ancient Irish society, until the seventeenth century, and shows their similarities with Tom Bell’s legal polycentrism. Finally, he discusses restorative justice.O autor argumenta que um dos fatores que permitem aos governos praticar atos que privam os cidadãos de suas liberdades é o senso de legitimidade desses atos, aceitos pelo público. O cidadão médio crê que o governo é seu soberano legítimo, e que seria errado se recusar a obedecer a seus comandos. Este senso de legitimidade – que é um mito para o autor – foi nutrido pelos intelectuais do Estado ao longo dos tempos. O importante argumento retórico dos exemplos históricos de sociedades anárquicas que funcionaram e a evidência contemporânea de elementos operativamente anárquicos nas sociedades estatais mostram que nem sempre foi assim, que não é assim em todos os lugares e sob todos os aspectos, mesmo agora, e que não tem que ser assim. Casey ilustra sua argumentação em favor de sociedades anárquicas com o exemplo da antiga sociedade irlandesa, até o século XVII e mostra que suas semelhanças com o policentrismo jurídico de Tom Bell. Por fim, discute a justiça restaurativa.Instituto Mises Brasil2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/59910.30800/mises.2014.v2.599MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014); 211-222MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2014); 211-222MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 2 n. 1 (2014); 211-2222594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/599/305Casey, Gerardinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:31:53Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/599Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:53Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
Reflexões sobre o Policentrismo Jurídico
title Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
spellingShingle Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
Casey, Gerard
Libertarianismo
Policentrismo Jurídico
Estado
Sociedade Irlandesa
Propriedade Privada
Justiça Restaurativa
Libertarianism
Legal Polycentrism
State
Irish Society
Private Property
Restorative Justice
title_short Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
title_full Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
title_fullStr Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
title_sort Reflections on Legal Polycentrism
author Casey, Gerard
author_facet Casey, Gerard
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casey, Gerard
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Libertarianismo
Policentrismo Jurídico
Estado
Sociedade Irlandesa
Propriedade Privada
Justiça Restaurativa
Libertarianism
Legal Polycentrism
State
Irish Society
Private Property
Restorative Justice
topic Libertarianismo
Policentrismo Jurídico
Estado
Sociedade Irlandesa
Propriedade Privada
Justiça Restaurativa
Libertarianism
Legal Polycentrism
State
Irish Society
Private Property
Restorative Justice
description The author argues that one of the factors that allow governments to perform acts that deprive citizens of their freedoms is the sense of legitimacy of these acts, accepted by the public. The average citizen believes that the government is their rightful sovereign, and it would be wrong to refuse to obey their commands. This sense of legitimacy – that is a myth for the author – was nurtured by State intellectuals over time. The important rhetorical argument of historical examples of anarchist societies that worked and contemporary evidence of lawless elements operatively in state societies show that was not always so, it is not so in all places and in all respects, even now, and that does not it must be so. Casey illustrates his argument in favor of anarchic societies with the example of the ancient Irish society, until the seventeenth century, and shows their similarities with Tom Bell’s legal polycentrism. Finally, he discusses restorative justice.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/599
10.30800/mises.2014.v2.599
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/599
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2014.v2.599
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/599/305
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014); 211-222
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2014); 211-222
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 2 n. 1 (2014); 211-222
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313180484599808