The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbieri, Fabio
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1440
Resumo: This article examines, compares and criticizes two books on the history of classical liberalism, written by written by two Brazilian intellectuals, Roque Spencer Maciel de Barros and José Guilherme Merquior. These works are used as case studies of the consequences of reducing politics to morals. We argue that, by rejecting the contributions of economists to liberalism, the two authors offer emptied versions of liberalism, as they ignore crucial elements of liberal doctrine, namely, the study of the unintended consequences of human action and the fallibilist model on the growth of knowledge.
id IMB-1_97f53b4becd20001a5b27a20a7abd875
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1440
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and MerquiorLa pobreza del liberalismo antieconomista: los casos de Barros y MerquiorA Pobreza do Liberalismo Anti-economicista: os casos de Barros e MerquiorBarrosMerquiorliberalismoBarrosMerquiorclassical liberalismBarrosMerquiorliberalismoThis article examines, compares and criticizes two books on the history of classical liberalism, written by written by two Brazilian intellectuals, Roque Spencer Maciel de Barros and José Guilherme Merquior. These works are used as case studies of the consequences of reducing politics to morals. We argue that, by rejecting the contributions of economists to liberalism, the two authors offer emptied versions of liberalism, as they ignore crucial elements of liberal doctrine, namely, the study of the unintended consequences of human action and the fallibilist model on the growth of knowledge.Este artículo examina, compara y critica dos libros sobre la historia del liberalismo, escritos por Roque Spencer Maciel de Barros y José Guilherme Merquior. Estos trabajos se utilizan como estudios de caso sobre las consecuencias de reducir la política a la moral. Argumentamos que, al rechazar las contribuciones de los economistas al liberalismo, los dos autores ofrecen versiones vacías del liberalismo, ya que ignoran elementos cruciales de la doctrina liberal, a saber, el estudio de las consecuencias no deseadas de la acción humana y el modelo falibilista de crecimiento del conocimiento.Este artigo examina, compara e critica dois livros sobre a história do liberalismo, escritas por Roque Spencer Maciel de Barros e José Guilherme Merquior. Essas obras são utilizadas como estudos de caso sobre as consequências da redução da política à moral. Argumentamos que, ao rejeitar as contribuições dos economistas ao liberalismo, os dois autores oferecem versões esvaziadas do liberalismo, pois ignoram elementos crucias da doutrina liberal, a saber, o estudo das consequências não intencionais da ação humana e o modelo falibilista sobre o crescimento do conhecimento.Instituto Mises Brasil2022-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/144010.30800/mises.2022.v10.1440MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 10 (2022): Yearly Continuous PublicationMISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 10 (2022): Publicación Anual ContinuaMISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 10 (2022): Publicação Contínua2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1440/723Copyright (c) 2022 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economicshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbieri, Fabio2022-06-13T14:28:04Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1440Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2022-06-13T14:28:04Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
La pobreza del liberalismo antieconomista: los casos de Barros y Merquior
A Pobreza do Liberalismo Anti-economicista: os casos de Barros e Merquior
title The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
spellingShingle The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
Barbieri, Fabio
Barros
Merquior
liberalismo
Barros
Merquior
classical liberalism
Barros
Merquior
liberalismo
title_short The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
title_full The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
title_fullStr The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
title_full_unstemmed The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
title_sort The Poverty of Anti-economicist liberalism: the cases of Barros and Merquior
author Barbieri, Fabio
author_facet Barbieri, Fabio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbieri, Fabio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Barros
Merquior
liberalismo
Barros
Merquior
classical liberalism
Barros
Merquior
liberalismo
topic Barros
Merquior
liberalismo
Barros
Merquior
classical liberalism
Barros
Merquior
liberalismo
description This article examines, compares and criticizes two books on the history of classical liberalism, written by written by two Brazilian intellectuals, Roque Spencer Maciel de Barros and José Guilherme Merquior. These works are used as case studies of the consequences of reducing politics to morals. We argue that, by rejecting the contributions of economists to liberalism, the two authors offer emptied versions of liberalism, as they ignore crucial elements of liberal doctrine, namely, the study of the unintended consequences of human action and the fallibilist model on the growth of knowledge.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1440
10.30800/mises.2022.v10.1440
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1440
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2022.v10.1440
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1440/723
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 10 (2022): Yearly Continuous Publication
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 10 (2022): Publicación Anual Continua
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 10 (2022): Publicação Contínua
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313179745353728

Registros relacionados