The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1223 |
Resumo: | This paper analyzes Schumpeter’s concept of the entrepreneur in comparison to Kirzner and the Austrian School of Economics. For this purpose, the research uses the original German text as the reference, both the first larger edition of 1911 and the later shorter editions (mainly the seventh edition of 1987, which is an unaltered reprint of the fourth edition of 1934). To elaborate on the differences and similarities between Schumpeter and the Austrian approach, the study focuses on the aspects of equilibrium, discovery, speculation, capital, profit, institutions, and development. The analysis shows how the entrepreneur acts as the motor of economic development and how profit and profit expectations serve as the motifs of entrepreneurial action – both for the pioneer of innovation and the imitators. Different from the Austrian School, Schumpeter applies the concept of equilibrium in the neoclassical sense as the starting point of his dynamic analysis. The Schumpeterian entrepreneur is that economic actor who breaks the statics to push the economy toward development, which is not merely economic growth because development signifies that fundamental changes of the economy take place in the process. |
id |
IMB-1_a724a2147a03e8145e86df96b0065222 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1223 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to KirznerEl concepto de empresario de Schumpeter en comparación con KirznerO conceito de empreendedor de Schumpeter em comparação a KirznerEmpreendedorismoSchumpeterEscola AustríacaLucroDesenvolvimentoEntrepreneurshipSchumpeterAustrian SchoolProfitDevelopmentEmprendimientoSchumpeterEscuela AustriacaBeneficioDesarrolloThis paper analyzes Schumpeter’s concept of the entrepreneur in comparison to Kirzner and the Austrian School of Economics. For this purpose, the research uses the original German text as the reference, both the first larger edition of 1911 and the later shorter editions (mainly the seventh edition of 1987, which is an unaltered reprint of the fourth edition of 1934). To elaborate on the differences and similarities between Schumpeter and the Austrian approach, the study focuses on the aspects of equilibrium, discovery, speculation, capital, profit, institutions, and development. The analysis shows how the entrepreneur acts as the motor of economic development and how profit and profit expectations serve as the motifs of entrepreneurial action – both for the pioneer of innovation and the imitators. Different from the Austrian School, Schumpeter applies the concept of equilibrium in the neoclassical sense as the starting point of his dynamic analysis. The Schumpeterian entrepreneur is that economic actor who breaks the statics to push the economy toward development, which is not merely economic growth because development signifies that fundamental changes of the economy take place in the process.Este artículo analiza el concepto del empresario Schumpeter en comparación con Kirzner y con la Escuela Austriaca de Economía. Para este propósito, la investigación utiliza el texto original en alemán como referencia, tanto la primera edición más grande de 1911 como las posteriores ediciones más cortas (principalmente la séptima edición de 1987, que es una reedición no modificada de la cuarta edición de 1934). Para profundizar en las diferencias y similitudes entre Schumpeter y el enfoque austriaco, el estudio se centra en los aspectos de equilibrio, descubrimiento, especulación, capital, ganancias, instituciones y desarrollo. El análisis muestra cómo actúa el empresario como motor del desarrollo económico y cómo las ganancias y las expectativas de ganancias sirven como motivos de acción empresarial, tanto para el pionero de la innovación como para los imitadores. A diferencia de la Escuela Austriaca, Schumpeter aplica el concepto de equilibrio en el sentido neoclásico como punto de partida de su análisis dinámico. El empresario schumpeteriano es el actor económico que rompe las reglas estáticas para impulsar la economía hacia el desarrollo, que no es simplemente el crecimiento económico, porque el desarrollo significa que en el proceso se producen cambios fundamentales de la economía.Este artigo analisa o conceito de empreendedor de Schumpeter, em comparação a Kirzner e à Escola Austríaca de Economia. Para este propósito, a pesquisa usa o texto alemão original como referência, tanto aprimeira edição maior de 1911, quanto as posteriores edições mais curtas (principalmente, a sétima ediçãode 1987, que é uma reedição inalterada da quarta edição de 1934). Para elaborar as diferenças e semelhanças entre Schumpeter e a abordagem austríaca, o estudo enfoca os aspectos de equilíbrio, descoberta, especulação, capital, lucro, instituições e desenvolvimento. A análise mostra como o empreendedor atua como o motor do desenvolvimento econômico e como o lucro e as expectativas de lucro servem como motivos da ação empreendedora – tanto para o pioneiro da inovação, quanto para os imitadores. Diferente da Escola Austríaca, Schumpeter aplica o conceito de equilíbrio no sentido neoclássico como ponto de partida de sua análise dinâmica. O empreendedor schumpeteriano é aquele ator econômico que rompe a estática para empurrar a economia ao desenvolvimento, que não é meramente crescimento porque significa que mudanças fundamentais da economia ocorrem no processo.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/122310.30800/mises.2019.v7.1223MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (sep-dec)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (sept-dic)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 3 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (set-dez)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBenghttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1223/656Vaz-Curado, Samuel Fernandes LucenaMueller, Antony Peterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-12-19T15:32:57Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1223Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-12-19T15:32:57Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner El concepto de empresario de Schumpeter en comparación con Kirzner O conceito de empreendedor de Schumpeter em comparação a Kirzner |
title |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner |
spellingShingle |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner Vaz-Curado, Samuel Fernandes Lucena Empreendedorismo Schumpeter Escola Austríaca Lucro Desenvolvimento Entrepreneurship Schumpeter Austrian School Profit Development Emprendimiento Schumpeter Escuela Austriaca Beneficio Desarrollo |
title_short |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner |
title_full |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner |
title_fullStr |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner |
title_full_unstemmed |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner |
title_sort |
The concept of entrepreneur of Schumpeter in comparison to Kirzner |
author |
Vaz-Curado, Samuel Fernandes Lucena |
author_facet |
Vaz-Curado, Samuel Fernandes Lucena Mueller, Antony Peter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mueller, Antony Peter |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vaz-Curado, Samuel Fernandes Lucena Mueller, Antony Peter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Empreendedorismo Schumpeter Escola Austríaca Lucro Desenvolvimento Entrepreneurship Schumpeter Austrian School Profit Development Emprendimiento Schumpeter Escuela Austriaca Beneficio Desarrollo |
topic |
Empreendedorismo Schumpeter Escola Austríaca Lucro Desenvolvimento Entrepreneurship Schumpeter Austrian School Profit Development Emprendimiento Schumpeter Escuela Austriaca Beneficio Desarrollo |
description |
This paper analyzes Schumpeter’s concept of the entrepreneur in comparison to Kirzner and the Austrian School of Economics. For this purpose, the research uses the original German text as the reference, both the first larger edition of 1911 and the later shorter editions (mainly the seventh edition of 1987, which is an unaltered reprint of the fourth edition of 1934). To elaborate on the differences and similarities between Schumpeter and the Austrian approach, the study focuses on the aspects of equilibrium, discovery, speculation, capital, profit, institutions, and development. The analysis shows how the entrepreneur acts as the motor of economic development and how profit and profit expectations serve as the motifs of entrepreneurial action – both for the pioneer of innovation and the imitators. Different from the Austrian School, Schumpeter applies the concept of equilibrium in the neoclassical sense as the starting point of his dynamic analysis. The Schumpeterian entrepreneur is that economic actor who breaks the statics to push the economy toward development, which is not merely economic growth because development signifies that fundamental changes of the economy take place in the process. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1223 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1223 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1223 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1223/656 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (sep-dec) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (sept-dic) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 3 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (set-dez) 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181916954624 |