Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/729 |
Resumo: | The author exposes the blatant misconceptions of Piketty, among which he points out that what keeps the net savings and net investment it is not a time preference in continual decline and, but instead the increase in the quantity of money and the in volume of spending. He argues that the time preference may indefinitely remain unaltered while net savings and net investment continuously follow along the unchanged time preference, simply because the increase in the quantity of money and in the volume of spending is increasing the cash income. He shows that Piketty, by suggesting to prevent the accumulation of capital through income tax rates of the magnitude of 80%, is actually proposing the destruction of the accumulated capital, by taxing it to the high rate of 10% per year. |
id |
IMB-1_aaf13d4ee1b960edbaf71e87bf0a295d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/729 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part IIO Capital de Piketty:: Teoria Errada / Programa Destrutivo – Parte IIThomas PikettyCapitalPoupançaDesigualdadeThomas PikettyCapitalSavingsInequalityThe author exposes the blatant misconceptions of Piketty, among which he points out that what keeps the net savings and net investment it is not a time preference in continual decline and, but instead the increase in the quantity of money and the in volume of spending. He argues that the time preference may indefinitely remain unaltered while net savings and net investment continuously follow along the unchanged time preference, simply because the increase in the quantity of money and in the volume of spending is increasing the cash income. He shows that Piketty, by suggesting to prevent the accumulation of capital through income tax rates of the magnitude of 80%, is actually proposing the destruction of the accumulated capital, by taxing it to the high rate of 10% per year.O autor coloca a nu os flagrantes equívocos de Piketty, entre os quais ressalta que não é uma preferência temporal em queda contínua o que mantém a poupança líquida e o investimento líquido, mas sim o aumento na quantidade de dinheiro e no volume de gastos. Argumenta que a preferência temporal pode permanecer a mesma por tempo indeterminado enquanto a poupança líquida e o investimento líquido seguem continuamente ao lado da preferência temporal inalterada, simplesmente porque o aumento na quantidade de dinheiro e no volume de gastos está aumentando os rendimentos em dinheiro. Mostra que Piketty, ao sugerir impedir a acumulação de capital por meio de alíquotas de imposto de renda da grandeza de 80%, está propondo na verdade a destruição do capital acumulado, tributando-o à elevada taxa de 10% ao ano.Instituto Mises Brasil2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/72910.30800/mises.2015.v3.729MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015); 167-185MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2015); 167-185MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 1 (2015); 167-1852594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/729/419Reisman, Georgeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:31:38Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/729Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:38Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II O Capital de Piketty:: Teoria Errada / Programa Destrutivo – Parte II |
title |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II |
spellingShingle |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II Reisman, George Thomas Piketty Capital Poupança Desigualdade Thomas Piketty Capital Savings Inequality |
title_short |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II |
title_full |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II |
title_fullStr |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II |
title_full_unstemmed |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II |
title_sort |
Piketty’s Capital:: Wrong Theory / Destructive Program – Part II |
author |
Reisman, George |
author_facet |
Reisman, George |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reisman, George |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Thomas Piketty Capital Poupança Desigualdade Thomas Piketty Capital Savings Inequality |
topic |
Thomas Piketty Capital Poupança Desigualdade Thomas Piketty Capital Savings Inequality |
description |
The author exposes the blatant misconceptions of Piketty, among which he points out that what keeps the net savings and net investment it is not a time preference in continual decline and, but instead the increase in the quantity of money and the in volume of spending. He argues that the time preference may indefinitely remain unaltered while net savings and net investment continuously follow along the unchanged time preference, simply because the increase in the quantity of money and in the volume of spending is increasing the cash income. He shows that Piketty, by suggesting to prevent the accumulation of capital through income tax rates of the magnitude of 80%, is actually proposing the destruction of the accumulated capital, by taxing it to the high rate of 10% per year. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/729 10.30800/mises.2015.v3.729 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/729 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2015.v3.729 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/729/419 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015); 167-185 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2015); 167-185 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 1 (2015); 167-185 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181166174208 |