The Myth of Efficiency

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rothbard, Murray N.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/517
Resumo: The author criticizes the concept of efficiency and emphasizes that it is much less sustainable when economists employ it for the aggregate of the society. The systemic failure of economic thinking to describe world’s reality is the result of the utilitarian philosophy that has dominated the economy for a century and a half. Utilitarianism suggests that the purpose of all individuals are actually the same , which leads the utilitarians to see all social conflict as technical and pragmatic, and that they can be solved provided that suitable means for common purposes were discovered and adopted. He calls this “myth of the ordinary and universal order”, which makes economists believe they can “scientifically” and somehow free of values prescribe what public policies should be adopted. For Rothbard, however, economists have to get used to the idea that not all life can be encompassed by economic theory. A painful lesson, no doubt, but that is offset by the realization that it may be good for our souls realize their own limits.
id IMB-1_b64ef981f0854e143b7f9e1943348266
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/517
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling The Myth of EfficiencyO Mito da EficiênciaFilosofia UtilitaristaEficiênciaFins IndividuaisFim ComumUtilitarian PhilosophyEfficiencyIndividual PurposesCommon PurposeThe author criticizes the concept of efficiency and emphasizes that it is much less sustainable when economists employ it for the aggregate of the society. The systemic failure of economic thinking to describe world’s reality is the result of the utilitarian philosophy that has dominated the economy for a century and a half. Utilitarianism suggests that the purpose of all individuals are actually the same , which leads the utilitarians to see all social conflict as technical and pragmatic, and that they can be solved provided that suitable means for common purposes were discovered and adopted. He calls this “myth of the ordinary and universal order”, which makes economists believe they can “scientifically” and somehow free of values prescribe what public policies should be adopted. For Rothbard, however, economists have to get used to the idea that not all life can be encompassed by economic theory. A painful lesson, no doubt, but that is offset by the realization that it may be good for our souls realize their own limits.O autor critica o conceito de eficiência e enfatiza que o mesmo é muito menos sustentável quando os economistas o empregam para o agregado de toda a sociedade. A incapacidade sistêmica do pensamento econômico para enxergar a realidade do mundo é resultado da filosofia utilitarista que vem dominando a economia há um século e meio. O utilitarismo sugere que os fins de todos são realmente os mesmos, o que leva os utilitaristas a verem todo o conflito social como técnico e pragmático, podendo ser resolvido desde que os meios adequados para tais fins comuns sejam descobertos e adotados. A isto denomina “mito do fim comum e universal”, que faz os economistas acreditarem que podem “científicamente” e livres de valores prescrever que políticas públicas devem ser adotadas. Para Rothbard, no entanto, os economistas terão de se acostumar com a ideia de que nem toda a vida pode ser abarcada pela teoria econômica. Uma lição dolorosa, sem dúvida, mas que é compensada pela compreensão de que pode ser bom para as nossas almas perceber os próprios limites.Instituto Mises Brasil2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/51710.30800/mises.2013.v1.517MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013); 583-588MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2013); 583-588MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 1 n. 2 (2013); 583-5882594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/517/241Rothbard, Murray N.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:32:01Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/517Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:32:01Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Myth of Efficiency
O Mito da Eficiência
title The Myth of Efficiency
spellingShingle The Myth of Efficiency
Rothbard, Murray N.
Filosofia Utilitarista
Eficiência
Fins Individuais
Fim Comum
Utilitarian Philosophy
Efficiency
Individual Purposes
Common Purpose
title_short The Myth of Efficiency
title_full The Myth of Efficiency
title_fullStr The Myth of Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed The Myth of Efficiency
title_sort The Myth of Efficiency
author Rothbard, Murray N.
author_facet Rothbard, Murray N.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rothbard, Murray N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Filosofia Utilitarista
Eficiência
Fins Individuais
Fim Comum
Utilitarian Philosophy
Efficiency
Individual Purposes
Common Purpose
topic Filosofia Utilitarista
Eficiência
Fins Individuais
Fim Comum
Utilitarian Philosophy
Efficiency
Individual Purposes
Common Purpose
description The author criticizes the concept of efficiency and emphasizes that it is much less sustainable when economists employ it for the aggregate of the society. The systemic failure of economic thinking to describe world’s reality is the result of the utilitarian philosophy that has dominated the economy for a century and a half. Utilitarianism suggests that the purpose of all individuals are actually the same , which leads the utilitarians to see all social conflict as technical and pragmatic, and that they can be solved provided that suitable means for common purposes were discovered and adopted. He calls this “myth of the ordinary and universal order”, which makes economists believe they can “scientifically” and somehow free of values prescribe what public policies should be adopted. For Rothbard, however, economists have to get used to the idea that not all life can be encompassed by economic theory. A painful lesson, no doubt, but that is offset by the realization that it may be good for our souls realize their own limits.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/517
10.30800/mises.2013.v1.517
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/517
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2013.v1.517
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/517/241
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013); 583-588
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2013); 583-588
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 1 n. 2 (2013); 583-588
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313180435316736