The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1181 |
Resumo: | Contemporary economic orthodoxy has a dual relationship with the methodology: at the same time that it does not debate themes related to the method, it denies recognition to those who do not follow its “official methodology”. This article aims to emphasize the importance of Austrians leading the methodological debate in Economics, highlighting their criticism of positivism and defending their own methodological posture, which is very close to the classical tradition. It Is also treated by the insertion of positivism in Economics, in which the epistemological problems of this analysis and the criticism of the Austrians are placed. Finally, there is a proposal of methodological posture for the austrians with the objective of expandingthe dialogue with orthodoxy and allowing an external criticism of it. |
id |
IMB-1_bff28e05c4bd7fc2d2005e1b617ca51f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1181 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical traditionLos Austriacos y el método: De la crítica al positivismo a la reintroducción de la tradición clásicaOs Austríacos e o Método: Da crítica ao positivismo ao resgate da tradição clássicaEscola Austríaca de Economiahistória do pensamento econômicometodologia econômicaFilosofia da ciênciaAustrian School of Economicshistory of economic thoughteconomic methodologyPhilosophy of scienceEscuela Austriaca de EconomíaHistoria del pensamiento económicometodología económicaFilosofía de la cienciaContemporary economic orthodoxy has a dual relationship with the methodology: at the same time that it does not debate themes related to the method, it denies recognition to those who do not follow its “official methodology”. This article aims to emphasize the importance of Austrians leading the methodological debate in Economics, highlighting their criticism of positivism and defending their own methodological posture, which is very close to the classical tradition. It Is also treated by the insertion of positivism in Economics, in which the epistemological problems of this analysis and the criticism of the Austrians are placed. Finally, there is a proposal of methodological posture for the austrians with the objective of expandingthe dialogue with orthodoxy and allowing an external criticism of it.La ortodoxia económica contemporánea tiene una doble relación con la metodología: al mismo tiempo que no debate temas relacionados con el método, niega el reconocimiento a aquellos que no siguen su “metodología oficial”. Este artículo pretende enfatizar la importancia de los Austrias liderando el debate metodológico en economía, destacando su crítica al positivismo y defendiendo su propia postura metodológica, que está muy cerca de la tradición clásica. También es tratada por la inserción del positivismo en economía, en la que se colocan los problemas epistemológicos de este análisis y la crítica de los austríacos. Por último, existe una propuesta de postura metodológica para la escuela con el objetivo de expandir el diálogo con la ortodoxia y permitir una crítica externa de la misma.A ortodoxia econômica contemporânea tem uma relação dual com a metodologia: ao mesmo tempo em que não debate temas relacionados ao método, nega reconhecimento a quem não segue a sua “metodologia oficial”. Este artigo tem por objetivo enfatizar a importância dos austríacos liderarem o debate metodológico em Economia, destacando suas críticas ao positivismo e defendendo sua própria postura metodológica, que é muito próxima à tradição clássica. É tratado também da inserção do positivismo em Economia, em que são colocados os problemas epistemológicos desta análise e a crítica dos austríacos. Por fim, coloca-se uma proposta de postura metodológica para a EA com o objetivo de ampliar o diálogo com a ortodoxia e permitir uma crítica externa a ela.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/118110.30800/mises.2019.v7.1181MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1181/636Lourenço Filho, Marceloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-07T16:54:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1181Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2020-04-07T16:54:48Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition Los Austriacos y el método: De la crítica al positivismo a la reintroducción de la tradición clásica Os Austríacos e o Método: Da crítica ao positivismo ao resgate da tradição clássica |
title |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition |
spellingShingle |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition Lourenço Filho, Marcelo Escola Austríaca de Economia história do pensamento econômico metodologia econômica Filosofia da ciência Austrian School of Economics history of economic thought economic methodology Philosophy of science Escuela Austriaca de Economía Historia del pensamiento económico metodología económica Filosofía de la ciencia |
title_short |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition |
title_full |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition |
title_fullStr |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition |
title_sort |
The Austrians and the method: From criticism to positivism to the recall of the classical tradition |
author |
Lourenço Filho, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Lourenço Filho, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço Filho, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Escola Austríaca de Economia história do pensamento econômico metodologia econômica Filosofia da ciência Austrian School of Economics history of economic thought economic methodology Philosophy of science Escuela Austriaca de Economía Historia del pensamiento económico metodología económica Filosofía de la ciencia |
topic |
Escola Austríaca de Economia história do pensamento econômico metodologia econômica Filosofia da ciência Austrian School of Economics history of economic thought economic methodology Philosophy of science Escuela Austriaca de Economía Historia del pensamiento económico metodología económica Filosofía de la ciencia |
description |
Contemporary economic orthodoxy has a dual relationship with the methodology: at the same time that it does not debate themes related to the method, it denies recognition to those who do not follow its “official methodology”. This article aims to emphasize the importance of Austrians leading the methodological debate in Economics, highlighting their criticism of positivism and defending their own methodological posture, which is very close to the classical tradition. It Is also treated by the insertion of positivism in Economics, in which the epistemological problems of this analysis and the criticism of the Austrians are placed. Finally, there is a proposal of methodological posture for the austrians with the objective of expandingthe dialogue with orthodoxy and allowing an external criticism of it. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1181 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1181 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1181 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1181 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1181/636 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago) 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181888643072 |