Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ibrahim, Karim Yaqub
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Moreira, Raquel Megale, Santos, Carolina Ferreira dos, Strabelli, Tânia Mara Varejão, Belizário, Juliana de Cássia, Pinto, Maria Isabel de Moraes, Marinho, Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli, Pereira, Juliana Marquezi, Mello, Liliane Saraiva de, Ando, Mauricio Cesar, Silva, Vitor Gabriel Lopes da, Sato, Paula Keiko, Lima, Marcos Alves de, França, João Italo Dias, Loch, Ana Paula, Miyaji, Karina Takesaki, Infante, Vanessa, Precioso, Alexander Roberto, Sartori, Ana Marli Christovam
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/224509
Resumo: Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines data in immunocompromised individuals are scarce. This trial assessed the immunogenicity of two CoronaVac doses and additional BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine doses in immunocompromised (IC) and immunocompetent (H) individuals. Adults with solid organ transplant (SOT), hematopoietic stem cell transplant, cancer, inborn immunity errors or rheumatic diseases were included in the IC group. Immunocompetent adults were used as control group for comparison. Participants received two CoronaVac doses within a 28-day interval. IC received two additional BNT162b2 doses and H received a third BNT162b2 dose (booster). Blood samples were collected at baseline, 28 days after each dose, pre-booster and at the trial end. We used three serological tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N), trimeric spike (S), and receptor binding domain (RBD). Outcomes included seroconversion rates (SCR), geometric mean titers (GMT) and GMT ratio (GMTR). A total of 241 IC and 100 H adults participated in the study. After two CoronaVac doses, IC had lower SCR than H: anti-N, 33.3% vs 79%; anti-S, 33.8% vs 86%, and anti-RBD, 48.5% vs 85%, respectively. IC also showed lower GMT than H: anti-N, 2.3 vs 15.1; anti-S, 58.8 vs 213.2 BAU/mL; and anti-RBD, 22.4 vs 168.0 U/mL, respectively. After the 3rd and 4th BNT162b2 doses, IC had significant anti-S and anti-RBD seroconversion, but still lower than H after the 3rd dose. After boosting, GMT increased in IC, but remained lower than in the H group. CoronaVac two-dose schedule immunogenicity was lower in IC than in H. BNT162b2 heterologous booster enhanced immune response in both groups.
id IMT-1_238d79a824858713c0bd89977264d088
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/224509
network_acronym_str IMT-1
network_name_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository_id_str
spelling Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent personsVaccine immunogenicityCOVID-19 vaccinesInactivated vaccineBNT162 vaccineInactivated COVID-19 vaccines data in immunocompromised individuals are scarce. This trial assessed the immunogenicity of two CoronaVac doses and additional BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine doses in immunocompromised (IC) and immunocompetent (H) individuals. Adults with solid organ transplant (SOT), hematopoietic stem cell transplant, cancer, inborn immunity errors or rheumatic diseases were included in the IC group. Immunocompetent adults were used as control group for comparison. Participants received two CoronaVac doses within a 28-day interval. IC received two additional BNT162b2 doses and H received a third BNT162b2 dose (booster). Blood samples were collected at baseline, 28 days after each dose, pre-booster and at the trial end. We used three serological tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N), trimeric spike (S), and receptor binding domain (RBD). Outcomes included seroconversion rates (SCR), geometric mean titers (GMT) and GMT ratio (GMTR). A total of 241 IC and 100 H adults participated in the study. After two CoronaVac doses, IC had lower SCR than H: anti-N, 33.3% vs 79%; anti-S, 33.8% vs 86%, and anti-RBD, 48.5% vs 85%, respectively. IC also showed lower GMT than H: anti-N, 2.3 vs 15.1; anti-S, 58.8 vs 213.2 BAU/mL; and anti-RBD, 22.4 vs 168.0 U/mL, respectively. After the 3rd and 4th BNT162b2 doses, IC had significant anti-S and anti-RBD seroconversion, but still lower than H after the 3rd dose. After boosting, GMT increased in IC, but remained lower than in the H group. CoronaVac two-dose schedule immunogenicity was lower in IC than in H. BNT162b2 heterologous booster enhanced immune response in both groups.Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo2024-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/22450910.1590/Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 66 (2024); e24Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 66 (2024); e24Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 66 (2024); e241678-99460036-4665reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinstname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)instacron:IMTenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/224509/204087Copyright (c) 2024 Karim Yaqub Ibrahim, Raquel Megale Moreira, Carolina Ferreira dos Santos, Tânia Mara Varejão Strabelli, Juliana de Cássia Belizário, Maria Isabel de Moraes Pinto, Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli Marinho, Juliana Marquezi Pereira, Liliane Saraiva de Mello, Mauricio Cesar Ando, Vitor Gabriel Lopes da Silva, Paula Keiko Sato, Marcos Alves de Lima, João Italo Dias França, Ana Paula Loch, Karina Takesaki Miyaji, Vanessa Infante, Alexander Roberto Precioso, Ana Marli Christovam Sartorihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIbrahim, Karim YaqubMoreira, Raquel MegaleSantos, Carolina Ferreira dosStrabelli, Tânia Mara VarejãoBelizário, Juliana de CássiaPinto, Maria Isabel de MoraesMarinho, Ana Karolina Barreto BerselliPereira, Juliana MarqueziMello, Liliane Saraiva deAndo, Mauricio Cesar Silva, Vitor Gabriel Lopes daSato, Paula KeikoLima, Marcos Alves deFrança, João Italo Dias Loch, Ana PaulaMiyaji, Karina Takesaki Infante, VanessaPrecioso, Alexander RobertoSartori, Ana Marli Christovam2024-05-06T14:04:52Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/224509Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/oai||revimtsp@usp.br1678-99460036-4665opendoar:2024-05-06T14:04:52Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
title Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
spellingShingle Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
Ibrahim, Karim Yaqub
Vaccine immunogenicity
COVID-19 vaccines
Inactivated vaccine
BNT162 vaccine
title_short Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
title_full Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
title_fullStr Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
title_full_unstemmed Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
title_sort Immunogenicity of COVID-19 adsorbed inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) and additional doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent persons
author Ibrahim, Karim Yaqub
author_facet Ibrahim, Karim Yaqub
Moreira, Raquel Megale
Santos, Carolina Ferreira dos
Strabelli, Tânia Mara Varejão
Belizário, Juliana de Cássia
Pinto, Maria Isabel de Moraes
Marinho, Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli
Pereira, Juliana Marquezi
Mello, Liliane Saraiva de
Ando, Mauricio Cesar
Silva, Vitor Gabriel Lopes da
Sato, Paula Keiko
Lima, Marcos Alves de
França, João Italo Dias
Loch, Ana Paula
Miyaji, Karina Takesaki
Infante, Vanessa
Precioso, Alexander Roberto
Sartori, Ana Marli Christovam
author_role author
author2 Moreira, Raquel Megale
Santos, Carolina Ferreira dos
Strabelli, Tânia Mara Varejão
Belizário, Juliana de Cássia
Pinto, Maria Isabel de Moraes
Marinho, Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli
Pereira, Juliana Marquezi
Mello, Liliane Saraiva de
Ando, Mauricio Cesar
Silva, Vitor Gabriel Lopes da
Sato, Paula Keiko
Lima, Marcos Alves de
França, João Italo Dias
Loch, Ana Paula
Miyaji, Karina Takesaki
Infante, Vanessa
Precioso, Alexander Roberto
Sartori, Ana Marli Christovam
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ibrahim, Karim Yaqub
Moreira, Raquel Megale
Santos, Carolina Ferreira dos
Strabelli, Tânia Mara Varejão
Belizário, Juliana de Cássia
Pinto, Maria Isabel de Moraes
Marinho, Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli
Pereira, Juliana Marquezi
Mello, Liliane Saraiva de
Ando, Mauricio Cesar
Silva, Vitor Gabriel Lopes da
Sato, Paula Keiko
Lima, Marcos Alves de
França, João Italo Dias
Loch, Ana Paula
Miyaji, Karina Takesaki
Infante, Vanessa
Precioso, Alexander Roberto
Sartori, Ana Marli Christovam
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vaccine immunogenicity
COVID-19 vaccines
Inactivated vaccine
BNT162 vaccine
topic Vaccine immunogenicity
COVID-19 vaccines
Inactivated vaccine
BNT162 vaccine
description Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines data in immunocompromised individuals are scarce. This trial assessed the immunogenicity of two CoronaVac doses and additional BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine doses in immunocompromised (IC) and immunocompetent (H) individuals. Adults with solid organ transplant (SOT), hematopoietic stem cell transplant, cancer, inborn immunity errors or rheumatic diseases were included in the IC group. Immunocompetent adults were used as control group for comparison. Participants received two CoronaVac doses within a 28-day interval. IC received two additional BNT162b2 doses and H received a third BNT162b2 dose (booster). Blood samples were collected at baseline, 28 days after each dose, pre-booster and at the trial end. We used three serological tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N), trimeric spike (S), and receptor binding domain (RBD). Outcomes included seroconversion rates (SCR), geometric mean titers (GMT) and GMT ratio (GMTR). A total of 241 IC and 100 H adults participated in the study. After two CoronaVac doses, IC had lower SCR than H: anti-N, 33.3% vs 79%; anti-S, 33.8% vs 86%, and anti-RBD, 48.5% vs 85%, respectively. IC also showed lower GMT than H: anti-N, 2.3 vs 15.1; anti-S, 58.8 vs 213.2 BAU/mL; and anti-RBD, 22.4 vs 168.0 U/mL, respectively. After the 3rd and 4th BNT162b2 doses, IC had significant anti-S and anti-RBD seroconversion, but still lower than H after the 3rd dose. After boosting, GMT increased in IC, but remained lower than in the H group. CoronaVac two-dose schedule immunogenicity was lower in IC than in H. BNT162b2 heterologous booster enhanced immune response in both groups.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/224509
10.1590/
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/224509
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/224509/204087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 66 (2024); e24
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 66 (2024); e24
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 66 (2024); e24
1678-9946
0036-4665
reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
instname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron:IMT
instname_str Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron_str IMT
institution IMT
reponame_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
collection Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revimtsp@usp.br
_version_ 1798951636670873600