Systematic reviews on leptospirosis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30407 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: To find the existing clinical evidence on interventions for leptospirosis. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of any intervention on leptospirosis through systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCE: The sources of studies used (where there were no limitations concerning language, date, or other restrictions) were: EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Database, and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Randomized Trials register. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Type of Study: All systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. Participants: patients with clinical and/or laboratorial diagnosis of leptospirosis, and subjects potencially exposed to leptospirosis as defined by the authors Interventions: any intervention for leptospirosis (as antibiotics or vaccines for prevention or treatment). DATA COLLECTION: The assessment will be independently made by the reviewers and cross-checked. The external validity was assessed by analysis of: studies, interventions, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Located 163 studies using the search strategy described above, at the electronic databases above. Only 2 hits were selected, which are protocols of systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration, and not full reviews. One of the protocols evaluates antibiotics for treatment, and the other evaluates antibiotics for prevention of leptospirosis. CONCLUSIONS: There were not complete systematic reviews on interventions for leptospirosis. Any interventions for leptospirosis, such as prevention and treatment remains unclear for guidelines and practice. |
id |
IMT-1_2864bb6202f8f9c6cf3dc0d4b6164059 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/30407 |
network_acronym_str |
IMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis LeptospiroTreatmPreventSystematic revMeta-analy OBJECTIVES: To find the existing clinical evidence on interventions for leptospirosis. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of any intervention on leptospirosis through systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCE: The sources of studies used (where there were no limitations concerning language, date, or other restrictions) were: EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Database, and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Randomized Trials register. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Type of Study: All systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. Participants: patients with clinical and/or laboratorial diagnosis of leptospirosis, and subjects potencially exposed to leptospirosis as defined by the authors Interventions: any intervention for leptospirosis (as antibiotics or vaccines for prevention or treatment). DATA COLLECTION: The assessment will be independently made by the reviewers and cross-checked. The external validity was assessed by analysis of: studies, interventions, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Located 163 studies using the search strategy described above, at the electronic databases above. Only 2 hits were selected, which are protocols of systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration, and not full reviews. One of the protocols evaluates antibiotics for treatment, and the other evaluates antibiotics for prevention of leptospirosis. CONCLUSIONS: There were not complete systematic reviews on interventions for leptospirosis. Any interventions for leptospirosis, such as prevention and treatment remains unclear for guidelines and practice. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo2000-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30407Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2000); 47-49 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2000); 47-49 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 42 n. 1 (2000); 47-49 1678-99460036-4665reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinstname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)instacron:IMTenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30407/32291Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGUIDUGLI, FabioCASTRO, Aldemar AraujoATALLAH, Álvaro Nagib2012-07-07T09:33:14Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/30407Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/oai||revimtsp@usp.br1678-99460036-4665opendoar:2022-12-13T16:51:10.606542Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
title |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
spellingShingle |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis GUIDUGLI, Fabio Leptospiro Treatm Prevent Systematic rev Meta-analy |
title_short |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
title_full |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
title_fullStr |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
title_sort |
Systematic reviews on leptospirosis |
author |
GUIDUGLI, Fabio |
author_facet |
GUIDUGLI, Fabio CASTRO, Aldemar Araujo ATALLAH, Álvaro Nagib |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CASTRO, Aldemar Araujo ATALLAH, Álvaro Nagib |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
GUIDUGLI, Fabio CASTRO, Aldemar Araujo ATALLAH, Álvaro Nagib |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Leptospiro Treatm Prevent Systematic rev Meta-analy |
topic |
Leptospiro Treatm Prevent Systematic rev Meta-analy |
description |
OBJECTIVES: To find the existing clinical evidence on interventions for leptospirosis. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of any intervention on leptospirosis through systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCE: The sources of studies used (where there were no limitations concerning language, date, or other restrictions) were: EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Database, and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Randomized Trials register. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Type of Study: All systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. Participants: patients with clinical and/or laboratorial diagnosis of leptospirosis, and subjects potencially exposed to leptospirosis as defined by the authors Interventions: any intervention for leptospirosis (as antibiotics or vaccines for prevention or treatment). DATA COLLECTION: The assessment will be independently made by the reviewers and cross-checked. The external validity was assessed by analysis of: studies, interventions, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Located 163 studies using the search strategy described above, at the electronic databases above. Only 2 hits were selected, which are protocols of systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration, and not full reviews. One of the protocols evaluates antibiotics for treatment, and the other evaluates antibiotics for prevention of leptospirosis. CONCLUSIONS: There were not complete systematic reviews on interventions for leptospirosis. Any interventions for leptospirosis, such as prevention and treatment remains unclear for guidelines and practice. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30407 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30407 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30407/32291 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2000); 47-49 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2000); 47-49 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 42 n. 1 (2000); 47-49 1678-9946 0036-4665 reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo instname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT) instacron:IMT |
instname_str |
Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT) |
instacron_str |
IMT |
institution |
IMT |
reponame_str |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
collection |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revimtsp@usp.br |
_version_ |
1798951642336329728 |