Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stranieri, Inês
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Kanunfre, Kelly Aparecida, Rodrigues, Jonatas Cristian, Yamamoto, Lidia, Nadaf, Maria Isabel Valdomir, Palmeira, Patricia, Okay, Thelma Suely
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760
Resumo: Bacterial sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and blood cultures are the gold standard of laboratory diagnosis even though they lack sensitivity in neonates. Culturenegative sepsis, also known as clinical sepsis, has long been considered a diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units because, as well as culture-positive infants, culture-negative neonates have worse prognosis in comparison with non-infected ones. Quantitative amplifications are used to detect bacterial infections in neonates but results are considered only in a qualitative way (positive or negative). The aim of the present study was to determine and compare bacterial load levels in blood culture-positive and culture-negative neonatal sepsis. Seventy neonates with clinical and laboratory evidence of infection admitted at three neonatal intensive care units were classified as blood culture-positive or culture-negative. Blood samples obtained at the same time of blood cultures had bacterial load levels assessed through a 16S rDNA qPCR. Blood cultures were positive in 29 cases (41.4%) and qPCR in 64 (91.4%). In the 29 culture-positive cases, 100% were also positive by qPCR, while in the 41 culture-negative cases, 35 (85.4%) were positive by qPCR. Bacterial load levels were in general < 50 CFU/mL, but were significantly higher in culture-positive cases (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.013), although clinical and laboratory findings were similar, excepting for deaths. In conclusion, the present study has shown that blood culture-negative neonates have lower bacteria load levels in their bloodstream when compared to blood culture-positive infants.
id IMT-1_b23d3d79491d554d6cde2d0b9d617441
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/151760
network_acronym_str IMT-1
network_name_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsisBlood cultureCulture-negative neonatal sepsisNeonatal blood stream infectionReal Time PCR16S rDNABacterial sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and blood cultures are the gold standard of laboratory diagnosis even though they lack sensitivity in neonates. Culturenegative sepsis, also known as clinical sepsis, has long been considered a diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units because, as well as culture-positive infants, culture-negative neonates have worse prognosis in comparison with non-infected ones. Quantitative amplifications are used to detect bacterial infections in neonates but results are considered only in a qualitative way (positive or negative). The aim of the present study was to determine and compare bacterial load levels in blood culture-positive and culture-negative neonatal sepsis. Seventy neonates with clinical and laboratory evidence of infection admitted at three neonatal intensive care units were classified as blood culture-positive or culture-negative. Blood samples obtained at the same time of blood cultures had bacterial load levels assessed through a 16S rDNA qPCR. Blood cultures were positive in 29 cases (41.4%) and qPCR in 64 (91.4%). In the 29 culture-positive cases, 100% were also positive by qPCR, while in the 41 culture-negative cases, 35 (85.4%) were positive by qPCR. Bacterial load levels were in general < 50 CFU/mL, but were significantly higher in culture-positive cases (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.013), although clinical and laboratory findings were similar, excepting for deaths. In conclusion, the present study has shown that blood culture-negative neonates have lower bacteria load levels in their bloodstream when compared to blood culture-positive infants.Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo2018-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 60 (2018); e61Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 60 (2018); e61Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 60 (2018); e611678-99460036-4665reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinstname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)instacron:IMTenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760/148667https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760/148671Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStranieri, InêsKanunfre, Kelly AparecidaRodrigues, Jonatas CristianYamamoto, LidiaNadaf, Maria Isabel ValdomirPalmeira, PatriciaOkay, Thelma Suely2018-11-13T10:22:37Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/151760Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/oai||revimtsp@usp.br1678-99460036-4665opendoar:2022-12-13T16:52:46.836589Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
title Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
spellingShingle Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
Stranieri, Inês
Blood culture
Culture-negative neonatal sepsis
Neonatal blood stream infection
Real Time PCR
16S rDNA
title_short Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
title_full Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
title_fullStr Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
title_sort Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis
author Stranieri, Inês
author_facet Stranieri, Inês
Kanunfre, Kelly Aparecida
Rodrigues, Jonatas Cristian
Yamamoto, Lidia
Nadaf, Maria Isabel Valdomir
Palmeira, Patricia
Okay, Thelma Suely
author_role author
author2 Kanunfre, Kelly Aparecida
Rodrigues, Jonatas Cristian
Yamamoto, Lidia
Nadaf, Maria Isabel Valdomir
Palmeira, Patricia
Okay, Thelma Suely
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stranieri, Inês
Kanunfre, Kelly Aparecida
Rodrigues, Jonatas Cristian
Yamamoto, Lidia
Nadaf, Maria Isabel Valdomir
Palmeira, Patricia
Okay, Thelma Suely
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blood culture
Culture-negative neonatal sepsis
Neonatal blood stream infection
Real Time PCR
16S rDNA
topic Blood culture
Culture-negative neonatal sepsis
Neonatal blood stream infection
Real Time PCR
16S rDNA
description Bacterial sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and blood cultures are the gold standard of laboratory diagnosis even though they lack sensitivity in neonates. Culturenegative sepsis, also known as clinical sepsis, has long been considered a diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units because, as well as culture-positive infants, culture-negative neonates have worse prognosis in comparison with non-infected ones. Quantitative amplifications are used to detect bacterial infections in neonates but results are considered only in a qualitative way (positive or negative). The aim of the present study was to determine and compare bacterial load levels in blood culture-positive and culture-negative neonatal sepsis. Seventy neonates with clinical and laboratory evidence of infection admitted at three neonatal intensive care units were classified as blood culture-positive or culture-negative. Blood samples obtained at the same time of blood cultures had bacterial load levels assessed through a 16S rDNA qPCR. Blood cultures were positive in 29 cases (41.4%) and qPCR in 64 (91.4%). In the 29 culture-positive cases, 100% were also positive by qPCR, while in the 41 culture-negative cases, 35 (85.4%) were positive by qPCR. Bacterial load levels were in general < 50 CFU/mL, but were significantly higher in culture-positive cases (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.013), although clinical and laboratory findings were similar, excepting for deaths. In conclusion, the present study has shown that blood culture-negative neonates have lower bacteria load levels in their bloodstream when compared to blood culture-positive infants.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760/148667
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/151760/148671
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 60 (2018); e61
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 60 (2018); e61
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 60 (2018); e61
1678-9946
0036-4665
reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
instname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron:IMT
instname_str Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron_str IMT
institution IMT
reponame_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
collection Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revimtsp@usp.br
_version_ 1798951652198187008