Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840 |
Resumo: | Comparative morphometric and morphological studies of eggs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) were undertaken in the three strains of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus, i.e., Form B (Chiang Mai and Phet Buri strains) and Form C (Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son strains). Morphometric examination revealed the intraspecific variation with respect to the float width [36.77 ± 2.30 µm (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 38.49 ± 2.78 µm (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) = 39.06 ± 2.37 µm (Form B: Phet Buri strain) >; 32.40 ± 3.52 µm (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)] and number of posterior tubercles on deck [2.40 ± 0.52 (Form B: Phet Buri strain) = 2.70 ± 0.82 (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) < 3.10 ± 0.32 (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 3.20 ± 0.42 (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)], whereas the surface topography of eggs among the three strains of two karyotypic forms were morphologically similar. |
id |
IMT-1_c661723cd0112944ee2a08c3c4d1e976 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/30840 |
network_acronym_str |
IMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope Morfometria e morfologia comparadas de ovos de Anopheles aconitus formas B e C à microscopia eletrônica de varredura Anopheles aconitusKaryotypic formEggFine structureScanning electron microscopy Comparative morphometric and morphological studies of eggs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) were undertaken in the three strains of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus, i.e., Form B (Chiang Mai and Phet Buri strains) and Form C (Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son strains). Morphometric examination revealed the intraspecific variation with respect to the float width [36.77 ± 2.30 µm (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 38.49 ± 2.78 µm (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) = 39.06 ± 2.37 µm (Form B: Phet Buri strain) >; 32.40 ± 3.52 µm (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)] and number of posterior tubercles on deck [2.40 ± 0.52 (Form B: Phet Buri strain) = 2.70 ± 0.82 (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) < 3.10 ± 0.32 (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 3.20 ± 0.42 (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)], whereas the surface topography of eggs among the three strains of two karyotypic forms were morphologically similar. Estudos comparativos morfométricos e morfológicos de ovos à microscopia eletrônica de varredura (SEM) foram efetuados nas três linhagens de duas formas cariotípicas de Anopheles aconitus, isto é, Forma B (linhagens Chiang Mai e Phet Buri) e Forma C (linhagens Chiang Mai e Mae Hong Son). Exame morfométrico revelou a variação intraespecífica com respeito à largura de superfície [36,77 ± 2,30 µm (Forma C: linhagem Chiang Mai) = 38,49 ± 2,78 µm (Forma B: linhagem Chiang Mai) = 39,06 ± 2,37 µm (Forma B: linhagem Phet Buri) >; 32,40 ± 3,52 µm (Forma C: linhagem Mae Hong Son)] e número de tubérculos posteriores sobre a superfície livre [2,40 ± 0,52 (Forma B: linhagem Phet Buri) = 2,70 ± 0,82 (Forma B: linhagem Chiang Mai) < 3,10 ± 0,32 (Forma C: linhagem Chiang Mai) = 3,20 ± 0,42 (Forma C: linhagem Mae Hong Son)] embora a topografia de superfície dos ovos entre as três linhagens de duas formas cariotípicas tenham sido morfologicamente semelhantes. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo2004-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 No. 5 (2004); 257-262 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 Núm. 5 (2004); 257-262 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 46 n. 5 (2004); 257-262 1678-99460036-4665reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinstname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)instacron:IMTenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840/32724Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJunkum, AnuluckJitpakdi, AtchariyaKomalamisra, NarumonJariyapan, NarissaraSomboon, PradyaBates, Paul A.Choochote, Wej2012-07-07T18:30:00Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/30840Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/oai||revimtsp@usp.br1678-99460036-4665opendoar:2022-12-13T16:51:34.997389Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope Morfometria e morfologia comparadas de ovos de Anopheles aconitus formas B e C à microscopia eletrônica de varredura |
title |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope |
spellingShingle |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope Junkum, Anuluck Anopheles aconitus Karyotypic form Egg Fine structure Scanning electron microscopy |
title_short |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope |
title_full |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope |
title_fullStr |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope |
title_sort |
Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope |
author |
Junkum, Anuluck |
author_facet |
Junkum, Anuluck Jitpakdi, Atchariya Komalamisra, Narumon Jariyapan, Narissara Somboon, Pradya Bates, Paul A. Choochote, Wej |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jitpakdi, Atchariya Komalamisra, Narumon Jariyapan, Narissara Somboon, Pradya Bates, Paul A. Choochote, Wej |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Junkum, Anuluck Jitpakdi, Atchariya Komalamisra, Narumon Jariyapan, Narissara Somboon, Pradya Bates, Paul A. Choochote, Wej |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anopheles aconitus Karyotypic form Egg Fine structure Scanning electron microscopy |
topic |
Anopheles aconitus Karyotypic form Egg Fine structure Scanning electron microscopy |
description |
Comparative morphometric and morphological studies of eggs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) were undertaken in the three strains of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus, i.e., Form B (Chiang Mai and Phet Buri strains) and Form C (Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son strains). Morphometric examination revealed the intraspecific variation with respect to the float width [36.77 ± 2.30 µm (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 38.49 ± 2.78 µm (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) = 39.06 ± 2.37 µm (Form B: Phet Buri strain) >; 32.40 ± 3.52 µm (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)] and number of posterior tubercles on deck [2.40 ± 0.52 (Form B: Phet Buri strain) = 2.70 ± 0.82 (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) < 3.10 ± 0.32 (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 3.20 ± 0.42 (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)], whereas the surface topography of eggs among the three strains of two karyotypic forms were morphologically similar. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840/32724 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 No. 5 (2004); 257-262 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 Núm. 5 (2004); 257-262 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 46 n. 5 (2004); 257-262 1678-9946 0036-4665 reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo instname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT) instacron:IMT |
instname_str |
Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT) |
instacron_str |
IMT |
institution |
IMT |
reponame_str |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
collection |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revimtsp@usp.br |
_version_ |
1798951645062627328 |