Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Junkum, Anuluck
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Jitpakdi, Atchariya, Komalamisra, Narumon, Jariyapan, Narissara, Somboon, Pradya, Bates, Paul A., Choochote, Wej
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840
Resumo: Comparative morphometric and morphological studies of eggs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) were undertaken in the three strains of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus, i.e., Form B (Chiang Mai and Phet Buri strains) and Form C (Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son strains). Morphometric examination revealed the intraspecific variation with respect to the float width [36.77 ± 2.30 µm (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 38.49 ± 2.78 µm (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) = 39.06 ± 2.37 µm (Form B: Phet Buri strain) >; 32.40 ± 3.52 µm (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)] and number of posterior tubercles on deck [2.40 ± 0.52 (Form B: Phet Buri strain) = 2.70 ± 0.82 (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) < 3.10 ± 0.32 (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 3.20 ± 0.42 (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)], whereas the surface topography of eggs among the three strains of two karyotypic forms were morphologically similar.
id IMT-1_c661723cd0112944ee2a08c3c4d1e976
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/30840
network_acronym_str IMT-1
network_name_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope Morfometria e morfologia comparadas de ovos de Anopheles aconitus formas B e C à microscopia eletrônica de varredura Anopheles aconitusKaryotypic formEggFine structureScanning electron microscopy Comparative morphometric and morphological studies of eggs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) were undertaken in the three strains of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus, i.e., Form B (Chiang Mai and Phet Buri strains) and Form C (Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son strains). Morphometric examination revealed the intraspecific variation with respect to the float width [36.77 ± 2.30 µm (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 38.49 ± 2.78 µm (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) = 39.06 ± 2.37 µm (Form B: Phet Buri strain) >; 32.40 ± 3.52 µm (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)] and number of posterior tubercles on deck [2.40 ± 0.52 (Form B: Phet Buri strain) = 2.70 ± 0.82 (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) < 3.10 ± 0.32 (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 3.20 ± 0.42 (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)], whereas the surface topography of eggs among the three strains of two karyotypic forms were morphologically similar. Estudos comparativos morfométricos e morfológicos de ovos à microscopia eletrônica de varredura (SEM) foram efetuados nas três linhagens de duas formas cariotípicas de Anopheles aconitus, isto é, Forma B (linhagens Chiang Mai e Phet Buri) e Forma C (linhagens Chiang Mai e Mae Hong Son). Exame morfométrico revelou a variação intraespecífica com respeito à largura de superfície [36,77 ± 2,30 µm (Forma C: linhagem Chiang Mai) = 38,49 ± 2,78 µm (Forma B: linhagem Chiang Mai) = 39,06 ± 2,37 µm (Forma B: linhagem Phet Buri) >; 32,40 ± 3,52 µm (Forma C: linhagem Mae Hong Son)] e número de tubérculos posteriores sobre a superfície livre [2,40 ± 0,52 (Forma B: linhagem Phet Buri) = 2,70 ± 0,82 (Forma B: linhagem Chiang Mai) < 3,10 ± 0,32 (Forma C: linhagem Chiang Mai) = 3,20 ± 0,42 (Forma C: linhagem Mae Hong Son)] embora a topografia de superfície dos ovos entre as três linhagens de duas formas cariotípicas tenham sido morfologicamente semelhantes. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo2004-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 No. 5 (2004); 257-262 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 Núm. 5 (2004); 257-262 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 46 n. 5 (2004); 257-262 1678-99460036-4665reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinstname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)instacron:IMTenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840/32724Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJunkum, AnuluckJitpakdi, AtchariyaKomalamisra, NarumonJariyapan, NarissaraSomboon, PradyaBates, Paul A.Choochote, Wej2012-07-07T18:30:00Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/30840Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/oai||revimtsp@usp.br1678-99460036-4665opendoar:2022-12-13T16:51:34.997389Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
Morfometria e morfologia comparadas de ovos de Anopheles aconitus formas B e C à microscopia eletrônica de varredura
title Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
spellingShingle Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
Junkum, Anuluck
Anopheles aconitus
Karyotypic form
Egg
Fine structure
Scanning electron microscopy
title_short Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
title_full Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
title_fullStr Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
title_full_unstemmed Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
title_sort Comparative morphometry and morphology of Anopheles aconitus Form B and C eggs under scanning electron microscope
author Junkum, Anuluck
author_facet Junkum, Anuluck
Jitpakdi, Atchariya
Komalamisra, Narumon
Jariyapan, Narissara
Somboon, Pradya
Bates, Paul A.
Choochote, Wej
author_role author
author2 Jitpakdi, Atchariya
Komalamisra, Narumon
Jariyapan, Narissara
Somboon, Pradya
Bates, Paul A.
Choochote, Wej
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Junkum, Anuluck
Jitpakdi, Atchariya
Komalamisra, Narumon
Jariyapan, Narissara
Somboon, Pradya
Bates, Paul A.
Choochote, Wej
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anopheles aconitus
Karyotypic form
Egg
Fine structure
Scanning electron microscopy
topic Anopheles aconitus
Karyotypic form
Egg
Fine structure
Scanning electron microscopy
description Comparative morphometric and morphological studies of eggs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) were undertaken in the three strains of two karyotypic forms of Anopheles aconitus, i.e., Form B (Chiang Mai and Phet Buri strains) and Form C (Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son strains). Morphometric examination revealed the intraspecific variation with respect to the float width [36.77 ± 2.30 µm (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 38.49 ± 2.78 µm (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) = 39.06 ± 2.37 µm (Form B: Phet Buri strain) >; 32.40 ± 3.52 µm (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)] and number of posterior tubercles on deck [2.40 ± 0.52 (Form B: Phet Buri strain) = 2.70 ± 0.82 (Form B: Chiang Mai strain) < 3.10 ± 0.32 (Form C: Chiang Mai strain) = 3.20 ± 0.42 (Form C: Mae Hong Son strain)], whereas the surface topography of eggs among the three strains of two karyotypic forms were morphologically similar.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30840/32724
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 No. 5 (2004); 257-262
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 46 Núm. 5 (2004); 257-262
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 46 n. 5 (2004); 257-262
1678-9946
0036-4665
reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
instname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron:IMT
instname_str Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron_str IMT
institution IMT
reponame_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
collection Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revimtsp@usp.br
_version_ 1798951645062627328