Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
DOI: | 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2019v65n1.348 |
Texto Completo: | https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive câncer that is expected to increase in incidence by 2030. The best ways to treat this neoplasm are still under discussion. Objective: To synthesize the evidence of efficacy and safety of the different first-line chemotherapy regimens available for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Method: The LILACS, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Web of Science bibliographic databases were used. Studies were sought in the grey literature. Eligibility criteria included randomized phase II or III trials of chemotherapy-naive patients with pleural mesothelioma who underwent any therapeutic regimen, compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens or active symptom control, and presenting overall survival, progression free survival, tumor response and toxicity as outcomes. All steps were performed independently by two reviewers. The review protocol was recorded in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014388). Results: Thirteen studies involving fourteen therapeutic regimens were included. The only chemotherapy regimen that presented superior to the comparator with statistical significance in the three efficacy outcomes was cisplatin + pemetrexed. Cisplatin + pemetrexed and cisplatin + gemcitabine presented more grades 3 and 4 toxicity cases. Conclusion: There is good evidence to recommend combinations of platinum and antifolate derivatives as a first-choice option in the chemotherapeutic treatment of pleural mesothelioma. Further clinical studies are needed to support decisions to incorporate antifolates in the routine treatment of this neoplasm in Brazil. |
id |
INCA-1_3d6d44878c9eadd534ee45a68044c4d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/348 |
network_acronym_str |
INCA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
spelling |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic ReviewTratamiento Quimioterápico del Mesotelioma Pleural Maligno: Revisión SistemáticaTratamento Quimioterápico do Mesotelioma Pleural Maligno: Revisão SistemáticaMesoteliomaTratamento FarmacológicoNeoplasias PulmonaresMesotheliomaDrug TherapyLung NeoplasmsMesoteliomaTratamiento FarmacológicoNeoplasias PulmonaresIntroduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive câncer that is expected to increase in incidence by 2030. The best ways to treat this neoplasm are still under discussion. Objective: To synthesize the evidence of efficacy and safety of the different first-line chemotherapy regimens available for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Method: The LILACS, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Web of Science bibliographic databases were used. Studies were sought in the grey literature. Eligibility criteria included randomized phase II or III trials of chemotherapy-naive patients with pleural mesothelioma who underwent any therapeutic regimen, compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens or active symptom control, and presenting overall survival, progression free survival, tumor response and toxicity as outcomes. All steps were performed independently by two reviewers. The review protocol was recorded in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014388). Results: Thirteen studies involving fourteen therapeutic regimens were included. The only chemotherapy regimen that presented superior to the comparator with statistical significance in the three efficacy outcomes was cisplatin + pemetrexed. Cisplatin + pemetrexed and cisplatin + gemcitabine presented more grades 3 and 4 toxicity cases. Conclusion: There is good evidence to recommend combinations of platinum and antifolate derivatives as a first-choice option in the chemotherapeutic treatment of pleural mesothelioma. Further clinical studies are needed to support decisions to incorporate antifolates in the routine treatment of this neoplasm in Brazil.Introducción: El mesotelioma pleural maligno es un cáncer raro, agresivo y que presenta expectativa de aumento en la incidencia hasta 2030. Objetivo: Sintetizar las evidencias de eficacia y seguridad de los diferentes esquemas quimioterápicos de primera línea disponibles para el tratamiento del mesotelioma pleural maligno. Método: Se utilizaron las bases bibliográficas LILACS, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register y Web of Science. Se buscó estudios en la literatura gris. Los criterios de elegibilidad incluyeron ensayos aleatorizados de fase II o III, de pacientes con mesotelioma pleural vírgenes de tratamiento quimioterápico, sometidos a cualquier régimen terapéutico, teniendo como control otros esquemas quimioterápicos o control activo de síntomas, y presentando tiempo de supervivencia global, tiempo libre de progresión, respuesta tumoral y toxicidad como resultados. Todas las etapas fueron realizadas por dos revisores, de forma independiente. El protocolo de la revisión se registro en el International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014388). Resultados: Se incluyeron trece estudios de catorce esquemas terapéuticos. El único esquema quimioterápico que se presentó superior al comparador con significancia estadística en los tres resultados de eficacia fue cisplatino + pemetrexede. Cisplatino + pemetrexed y cisplatino + gemcitabina presentaron más casos de toxicidad grados 3 y 4. Conclusion: Existen buenas evidencias para recomendar combinaciones de derivado de platino y antifolato como opción de primera elección en el tratamiento quimioterápico del mesotelioma pleural. Más estudios clínicos son necesarios para basar decisiones de incorporación de los antifolatos en el tratamiento rutinario de esa neoplasia en Brasil.Introdução: O mesotelioma pleural maligno é um câncer raro, agressivo e que apresenta expectativa de aumento na incidência até 2030. As melhores formas de tratar essa neoplasia continuam em debate. Objetivo: Sintetizar as evidências de eficácia e segurança dos esquemas quimioterápicos de primeira linha disponíveis para o tratamento do mesotelioma pleural maligno. Método: Foram utilizadas as bases bibliográficas LILACS, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register e Web of Science. Buscaram-se estudos na literatura cinzenta. Os critérios de elegibilidade incluíram ensaios randomizados de fases II ou III, de pacientes com mesotelioma pleural virgem de tratamento quimioterápico, submetidos a qualquer regime terapêutico, tendo como controle outros esquemas quimioterápicos ou controle ativo de sintomas, e apresentando tempo de sobrevida global, tempo livre de progressão, resposta tumoral e toxicidade como desfechos. Todas as etapas foram realizadas por dois revisores, de forma independente. O protocolo da revisão foi registrado no International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014388). Resultados: Treze estudos envolvendo 14 esquemas terapêuticos foram incluídos. O único esquema quimioterápico que se apresentou superior ao comparado com significância estatística nos três desfechos de eficácia foi cisplatina + pemetrexede. Cisplatina + pemetrexede e cisplatina + gemcitabina apresentaram mais casos de toxicidade graus 3 e 4. Conclusão: Existem boas evidências para recomendar combinações de derivado de platina e antifolato como opção de primeira escolha no tratamento quimioterápico do mesotelioma pleural. Mais estudos clínicos são necessários para embasar decisões de incorporação dos antifolatos no tratamento rotineiro dessa neoplasia no Brasil. INCA2019-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de literaturaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/34810.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2019v65n1.348Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 65 No. 1 (2019): Jan./Feb./Mar.; e-14348Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 65 Núm. 1 (2019): enero/feb./marzo; e-14348Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 65 n. 1 (2019): jan./fev./mar.; e-143482176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporenghttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348/231https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348/514Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, André de OliveiraPepe, Vera Lúcia EdaisReis, Lenice Gnocchi da CostaCaetano, RosângelaOliveira, Luiz Gustavo André2021-11-29T20:04:12Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/348Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2021-11-29T20:04:12Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review Tratamiento Quimioterápico del Mesotelioma Pleural Maligno: Revisión Sistemática Tratamento Quimioterápico do Mesotelioma Pleural Maligno: Revisão Sistemática |
title |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review |
spellingShingle |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review Souza, André de Oliveira Mesotelioma Tratamento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares Mesothelioma Drug Therapy Lung Neoplasms Mesotelioma Tratamiento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares Souza, André de Oliveira Mesotelioma Tratamento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares Mesothelioma Drug Therapy Lung Neoplasms Mesotelioma Tratamiento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares |
title_short |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review |
title_full |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review |
title_sort |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Chemotherapy Treatment: Systematic Review |
author |
Souza, André de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Souza, André de Oliveira Souza, André de Oliveira Pepe, Vera Lúcia Edais Reis, Lenice Gnocchi da Costa Caetano, Rosângela Oliveira, Luiz Gustavo André Pepe, Vera Lúcia Edais Reis, Lenice Gnocchi da Costa Caetano, Rosângela Oliveira, Luiz Gustavo André |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pepe, Vera Lúcia Edais Reis, Lenice Gnocchi da Costa Caetano, Rosângela Oliveira, Luiz Gustavo André |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, André de Oliveira Pepe, Vera Lúcia Edais Reis, Lenice Gnocchi da Costa Caetano, Rosângela Oliveira, Luiz Gustavo André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mesotelioma Tratamento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares Mesothelioma Drug Therapy Lung Neoplasms Mesotelioma Tratamiento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares |
topic |
Mesotelioma Tratamento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares Mesothelioma Drug Therapy Lung Neoplasms Mesotelioma Tratamiento Farmacológico Neoplasias Pulmonares |
description |
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive câncer that is expected to increase in incidence by 2030. The best ways to treat this neoplasm are still under discussion. Objective: To synthesize the evidence of efficacy and safety of the different first-line chemotherapy regimens available for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Method: The LILACS, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Web of Science bibliographic databases were used. Studies were sought in the grey literature. Eligibility criteria included randomized phase II or III trials of chemotherapy-naive patients with pleural mesothelioma who underwent any therapeutic regimen, compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens or active symptom control, and presenting overall survival, progression free survival, tumor response and toxicity as outcomes. All steps were performed independently by two reviewers. The review protocol was recorded in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014388). Results: Thirteen studies involving fourteen therapeutic regimens were included. The only chemotherapy regimen that presented superior to the comparator with statistical significance in the three efficacy outcomes was cisplatin + pemetrexed. Cisplatin + pemetrexed and cisplatin + gemcitabine presented more grades 3 and 4 toxicity cases. Conclusion: There is good evidence to recommend combinations of platinum and antifolate derivatives as a first-choice option in the chemotherapeutic treatment of pleural mesothelioma. Further clinical studies are needed to support decisions to incorporate antifolates in the routine treatment of this neoplasm in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Revisão de literatura |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2019v65n1.348 |
url |
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2019v65n1.348 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348/231 https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/348/514 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
INCA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
INCA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 65 No. 1 (2019): Jan./Feb./Mar.; e-14348 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 65 Núm. 1 (2019): enero/feb./marzo; e-14348 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 65 n. 1 (2019): jan./fev./mar.; e-14348 2176-9745 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) instacron:INCA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) |
instacron_str |
INCA |
institution |
INCA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbc@inca.gov.br |
_version_ |
1822182042508460032 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2019v65n1.348 |